Cargando…
Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery
BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is known to be related with the postoperative outcomes, although it remains unclear whether pharmacologic anxiolysis preoperatively leads to better postanesthesia recovery. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess whether midazolam premedication would result in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28207530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006107 |
_version_ | 1782509395996835840 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Myoung Hwa Kim, Min Soo Lee, Jae Hoon Seo, Jae Hi Lee, Jeong-Rim |
author_facet | Kim, Myoung Hwa Kim, Min Soo Lee, Jae Hoon Seo, Jae Hi Lee, Jeong-Rim |
author_sort | Kim, Myoung Hwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is known to be related with the postoperative outcomes, although it remains unclear whether pharmacologic anxiolysis preoperatively leads to better postanesthesia recovery. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess whether midazolam premedication would result in improved Quality of Recovery-40 survey scores, as a postoperative recovery parameter, in female patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS: This randomized double-blind study was performed at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Eighty-two females undergoing breast cancer surgery with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia were enrolled and randomized to receive midazolam 0.02 mg kg(−1) (group M) or saline (group C). Anesthesia was conducted with total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil. On postoperative day 1, the Quality of Recovery-40 survey scores were surveyed. RESULTS: The global Quality of Recovery-40 survey scores on postoperative day 1 did not significantly differ between groups M and C (183 vs 181, P = 0.568). However, the induction time was significantly shorter in group M (3.2 vs 4.5 min, P < 0.001), as was the total intraoperative propofol consumption (705 vs 1004 mg; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Midazolam premedication does not seem to improve the postoperative quality of recovery, though group M showed faster induction and less propofol consumption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5319519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53195192017-03-02 Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery Kim, Myoung Hwa Kim, Min Soo Lee, Jae Hoon Seo, Jae Hi Lee, Jeong-Rim Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is known to be related with the postoperative outcomes, although it remains unclear whether pharmacologic anxiolysis preoperatively leads to better postanesthesia recovery. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess whether midazolam premedication would result in improved Quality of Recovery-40 survey scores, as a postoperative recovery parameter, in female patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS: This randomized double-blind study was performed at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Eighty-two females undergoing breast cancer surgery with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia were enrolled and randomized to receive midazolam 0.02 mg kg(−1) (group M) or saline (group C). Anesthesia was conducted with total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil. On postoperative day 1, the Quality of Recovery-40 survey scores were surveyed. RESULTS: The global Quality of Recovery-40 survey scores on postoperative day 1 did not significantly differ between groups M and C (183 vs 181, P = 0.568). However, the induction time was significantly shorter in group M (3.2 vs 4.5 min, P < 0.001), as was the total intraoperative propofol consumption (705 vs 1004 mg; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Midazolam premedication does not seem to improve the postoperative quality of recovery, though group M showed faster induction and less propofol consumption. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5319519/ /pubmed/28207530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006107 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3300 Kim, Myoung Hwa Kim, Min Soo Lee, Jae Hoon Seo, Jae Hi Lee, Jeong-Rim Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery |
title | Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery |
title_full | Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery |
title_fullStr | Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery |
title_short | Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery |
title_sort | can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28207530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimmyounghwa canqualityofrecoverybeenhancedbypremedicationwithmidazolamaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyinfemalesundergoingbreastsurgery AT kimminsoo canqualityofrecoverybeenhancedbypremedicationwithmidazolamaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyinfemalesundergoingbreastsurgery AT leejaehoon canqualityofrecoverybeenhancedbypremedicationwithmidazolamaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyinfemalesundergoingbreastsurgery AT seojaehi canqualityofrecoverybeenhancedbypremedicationwithmidazolamaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyinfemalesundergoingbreastsurgery AT leejeongrim canqualityofrecoverybeenhancedbypremedicationwithmidazolamaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyinfemalesundergoingbreastsurgery |