Cargando…
A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
PURPOSE: Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) can identify carriers, which is considered a benefit that enables reproductive planning. We examined the reproductive impact of carrier result disclosure from NBS for CF. METHODS: We surveyed mothers of carrier infants after NBS (Time-1) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.125 |
_version_ | 1782509437164978176 |
---|---|
author | Bombard, Yvonne Miller, Fiona A. Barg, Carolyn J. Patton, Sarah J. Carroll, June C. Chakraborty, Pranesh Potter, Beth K. Tam, Karen Taylor, Louise Kerr, Elizabeth Davies, Christine Milburn, Jennifer Ratjen, Felix Guttmann, Astrid Hayeems, Robin Z. |
author_facet | Bombard, Yvonne Miller, Fiona A. Barg, Carolyn J. Patton, Sarah J. Carroll, June C. Chakraborty, Pranesh Potter, Beth K. Tam, Karen Taylor, Louise Kerr, Elizabeth Davies, Christine Milburn, Jennifer Ratjen, Felix Guttmann, Astrid Hayeems, Robin Z. |
author_sort | Bombard, Yvonne |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) can identify carriers, which is considered a benefit that enables reproductive planning. We examined the reproductive impact of carrier result disclosure from NBS for CF. METHODS: We surveyed mothers of carrier infants after NBS (Time-1) and one-year later (Time-2) to ascertain intended and reported communication of their infants’ carrier results to relatives, carrier testing for themselves/other children and reproductive decisions. A sub-sample of mothers was also interviewed at Time-1 and Time-2. RESULTS: Response rate was 54%. Just over half (55%) of mothers carrier tested at Time-1; a further 40% of those who intended to test at Time-1 tested at Time-2. Carrier result communication to relatives was high (92%), but a majority of participants did not expect the results to influence family planning (65%). All interviewed mothers valued learning their infants’ carrier results. Some had carrier testing and shared results with family. Others did not use the results or used them in unintended ways. CONCLUSION: While mothers valued learning carrier results from NBS, they reported moderate uptake of carrier testing and limited influence on family planning. Our study highlights the secondary nature of the benefit from disclosing carrier results from NBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5319861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53198612017-07-01 A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis Bombard, Yvonne Miller, Fiona A. Barg, Carolyn J. Patton, Sarah J. Carroll, June C. Chakraborty, Pranesh Potter, Beth K. Tam, Karen Taylor, Louise Kerr, Elizabeth Davies, Christine Milburn, Jennifer Ratjen, Felix Guttmann, Astrid Hayeems, Robin Z. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) can identify carriers, which is considered a benefit that enables reproductive planning. We examined the reproductive impact of carrier result disclosure from NBS for CF. METHODS: We surveyed mothers of carrier infants after NBS (Time-1) and one-year later (Time-2) to ascertain intended and reported communication of their infants’ carrier results to relatives, carrier testing for themselves/other children and reproductive decisions. A sub-sample of mothers was also interviewed at Time-1 and Time-2. RESULTS: Response rate was 54%. Just over half (55%) of mothers carrier tested at Time-1; a further 40% of those who intended to test at Time-1 tested at Time-2. Carrier result communication to relatives was high (92%), but a majority of participants did not expect the results to influence family planning (65%). All interviewed mothers valued learning their infants’ carrier results. Some had carrier testing and shared results with family. Others did not use the results or used them in unintended ways. CONCLUSION: While mothers valued learning carrier results from NBS, they reported moderate uptake of carrier testing and limited influence on family planning. Our study highlights the secondary nature of the benefit from disclosing carrier results from NBS. 2016-09-08 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5319861/ /pubmed/27608173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.125 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Bombard, Yvonne Miller, Fiona A. Barg, Carolyn J. Patton, Sarah J. Carroll, June C. Chakraborty, Pranesh Potter, Beth K. Tam, Karen Taylor, Louise Kerr, Elizabeth Davies, Christine Milburn, Jennifer Ratjen, Felix Guttmann, Astrid Hayeems, Robin Z. A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis |
title | A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis |
title_full | A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis |
title_fullStr | A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis |
title_short | A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis |
title_sort | secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bombardyvonne asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT millerfionaa asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT bargcarolynj asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT pattonsarahj asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT carrolljunec asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT chakrabortypranesh asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT potterbethk asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT tamkaren asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT taylorlouise asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT kerrelizabeth asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT davieschristine asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT milburnjennifer asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT ratjenfelix asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT guttmannastrid asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT hayeemsrobinz asecondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT bombardyvonne secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT millerfionaa secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT bargcarolynj secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT pattonsarahj secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT carrolljunec secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT chakrabortypranesh secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT potterbethk secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT tamkaren secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT taylorlouise secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT kerrelizabeth secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT davieschristine secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT milburnjennifer secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT ratjenfelix secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT guttmannastrid secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis AT hayeemsrobinz secondarybenefitthereproductiveimpactofcarrierresultsfromnewbornscreeningforcysticfibrosis |