Cargando…

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus S-1 for the treatment of BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to TACE

AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus S-1 for the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage B HCC refractory to TACE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 26 patients meeting the eligibility criteria were enrolled. TACE was given o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Wu-Kui, Yang, Shu-Fa, You, Li-na, Liu, Mo, Liu, Deng-Yao, Gu, Peng, Fan, Xi-Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28239285
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2016.65607
Descripción
Sumario:AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus S-1 for the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage B HCC refractory to TACE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 26 patients meeting the eligibility criteria were enrolled. TACE was given on day 1, and S-1 on days 2–15. Tumor assessment was performed one month later according to mRECIST. The primary endpoints were TTP and OS. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 176 TACE interventions in all. Fifteen patients of TACE plus S-1 received a total of 55 cycles of treatment of S-1, with a median of 4 cycles (range, 2–6). The total dose of S-1 was 6165 mg per day, while average was 120 mg (range, 100–125 mg) for 15 patients of TACE plus S-1. Median TTP and OS of TACE plus S-1 were 6 months (95% CI: 4.7–7.3) and 18 months (95% CI: 15.3–24.7), respectively, while TACE monotherapy was 4 months (95% CI: 2.4–5.6) and 13 months (95% CI: 9.8–16.2), respectively, and significant differences were detected. Though there were higher DCRs in patients of TACE plus S-1, no significant differences were detected. A total of 612 adverse events occurred during the course of the treatment, 367 in TACE plus S-1 and 245 in TACE mono-therapy. There were significant differences to anorexia and nausea, but they were tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: TACE plus S-1 in the present analysis was tolerable and associated with an interesting TTP and OS. TACE plus S-1 may be used as a new treatment method to BCLC Stage B HCC refractory to TACE.