Cargando…
What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the commonest cause of preventable blindness in working age populations, but up to 98% of visual loss secondary to DR can be prevented with early detection and treatment. In 2012, an innovative outreach DR screening model was implemented in remote communities...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2045-2 |
_version_ | 1782509580590252032 |
---|---|
author | Glasson, Nicola M. Larkins, Sarah L. Crossland, Lisa J. |
author_facet | Glasson, Nicola M. Larkins, Sarah L. Crossland, Lisa J. |
author_sort | Glasson, Nicola M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the commonest cause of preventable blindness in working age populations, but up to 98% of visual loss secondary to DR can be prevented with early detection and treatment. In 2012, an innovative outreach DR screening model was implemented in remote communities in a state of Australia. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability of this unique DR screening model to patients, health professionals and other key stakeholders. METHODS: This descriptive qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with patients opportunistically recruited whilst attending DR screening, and purposefully selected health care professionals either working within or impacted by the programme. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using NVIVO. An iterative process of thematic analysis was used following the principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with fourteen patients with diabetes living in three remote communities and nine health professionals or key stakeholders. Nine key themes emerged during interviews with health professionals, key stakeholders and patients: i) improved patient access to DR screening; ii) efficiency, financial implications and sustainability; iii) quality and safety; iv) multi-disciplinary diabetes care; v) training and education; vi) operational elements of service delivery; vii) communication, information sharing and linkages; viii) coordination and integration of the service and ix) suggested improvements to service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The Remote Outreach DR Screening Service is highly acceptable to patients and health professionals. Challenges have primarily been encountered in communication and coordination of the service and further development in these areas could improve the programme’s impact and sustainability in remote communities. The service is applicable to other remote communities nationally and potentially internationally. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2045-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5320669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53206692017-02-24 What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study Glasson, Nicola M. Larkins, Sarah L. Crossland, Lisa J. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the commonest cause of preventable blindness in working age populations, but up to 98% of visual loss secondary to DR can be prevented with early detection and treatment. In 2012, an innovative outreach DR screening model was implemented in remote communities in a state of Australia. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability of this unique DR screening model to patients, health professionals and other key stakeholders. METHODS: This descriptive qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with patients opportunistically recruited whilst attending DR screening, and purposefully selected health care professionals either working within or impacted by the programme. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using NVIVO. An iterative process of thematic analysis was used following the principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with fourteen patients with diabetes living in three remote communities and nine health professionals or key stakeholders. Nine key themes emerged during interviews with health professionals, key stakeholders and patients: i) improved patient access to DR screening; ii) efficiency, financial implications and sustainability; iii) quality and safety; iv) multi-disciplinary diabetes care; v) training and education; vi) operational elements of service delivery; vii) communication, information sharing and linkages; viii) coordination and integration of the service and ix) suggested improvements to service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The Remote Outreach DR Screening Service is highly acceptable to patients and health professionals. Challenges have primarily been encountered in communication and coordination of the service and further development in these areas could improve the programme’s impact and sustainability in remote communities. The service is applicable to other remote communities nationally and potentially internationally. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2045-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5320669/ /pubmed/28222770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2045-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Glasson, Nicola M. Larkins, Sarah L. Crossland, Lisa J. What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study |
title | What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study |
title_full | What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study |
title_short | What do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative Australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? A qualitative study |
title_sort | what do patients with diabetes and providers think of an innovative australian model of remote diabetic retinopathy screening? a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2045-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glassonnicolam whatdopatientswithdiabetesandprovidersthinkofaninnovativeaustralianmodelofremotediabeticretinopathyscreeningaqualitativestudy AT larkinssarahl whatdopatientswithdiabetesandprovidersthinkofaninnovativeaustralianmodelofremotediabeticretinopathyscreeningaqualitativestudy AT crosslandlisaj whatdopatientswithdiabetesandprovidersthinkofaninnovativeaustralianmodelofremotediabeticretinopathyscreeningaqualitativestudy |