Cargando…
Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012
BACKGROUND: Contact with animals and their environment has long been recognized as an important source of enteric zoonoses. However, there are limited data available on the burden of illness associated with specific types of animals in Canada. This study describes the overall burden of enteric zoono...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4135-9 |
_version_ | 1782509596502392832 |
---|---|
author | Whitfield, Yvonne Johnson, Karen Hobbs, Leigh Middleton, Dean Dhar, Badal Vrbova, Linda |
author_facet | Whitfield, Yvonne Johnson, Karen Hobbs, Leigh Middleton, Dean Dhar, Badal Vrbova, Linda |
author_sort | Whitfield, Yvonne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contact with animals and their environment has long been recognized as an important source of enteric zoonoses. However, there are limited data available on the burden of illness associated with specific types of animals in Canada. This study describes the overall burden of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2012. METHODS: Confirmed cases of seven enteric zoonotic diseases (campylobacteriosis, cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis, listeriosis, salmonellosis, verotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) infection, and yersiniosis) with episode dates from 2010 to 2012 were extracted from the integrated Public Health Information System (iPHIS). Reported exposures were categorized as animal contact, foodborne, waterborne and ‘other’, with animal contact grouped into nine sub-categories based on the type of animal or transmission setting. Overall incidence rates and proportions by animal exposure categories, age and sex-specific incidence rates and hospitalization and death proportions were calculated and sex proportions compared. RESULTS: Our study found that approximately 26% of the enteric pathogens assessed during the 2010 to 2012 period reported contact with animals and their environments as the mode of transmission. Of enteric disease cases reporting animal contact, farm exposures were reported for 51.3%, dog or cat exposures for 26.3%, and reptile or amphibian exposures for 8.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Contact with animals was reported more frequently during the period 2010 to 2012 in comparison to the period 1997 to 2003 when 6% or less of enteric cases were associated with animal contact. Public health professionals, stakeholders associated with animals and their related industries (e.g., pet treats, mobile zoos, abattoirs), and the public should recognize that animal contact is an important source of enteric illnesses in order to take measures to reduce the burden of illness from animal sources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5320741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53207412017-02-24 Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012 Whitfield, Yvonne Johnson, Karen Hobbs, Leigh Middleton, Dean Dhar, Badal Vrbova, Linda BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Contact with animals and their environment has long been recognized as an important source of enteric zoonoses. However, there are limited data available on the burden of illness associated with specific types of animals in Canada. This study describes the overall burden of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2012. METHODS: Confirmed cases of seven enteric zoonotic diseases (campylobacteriosis, cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis, listeriosis, salmonellosis, verotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) infection, and yersiniosis) with episode dates from 2010 to 2012 were extracted from the integrated Public Health Information System (iPHIS). Reported exposures were categorized as animal contact, foodborne, waterborne and ‘other’, with animal contact grouped into nine sub-categories based on the type of animal or transmission setting. Overall incidence rates and proportions by animal exposure categories, age and sex-specific incidence rates and hospitalization and death proportions were calculated and sex proportions compared. RESULTS: Our study found that approximately 26% of the enteric pathogens assessed during the 2010 to 2012 period reported contact with animals and their environments as the mode of transmission. Of enteric disease cases reporting animal contact, farm exposures were reported for 51.3%, dog or cat exposures for 26.3%, and reptile or amphibian exposures for 8.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Contact with animals was reported more frequently during the period 2010 to 2012 in comparison to the period 1997 to 2003 when 6% or less of enteric cases were associated with animal contact. Public health professionals, stakeholders associated with animals and their related industries (e.g., pet treats, mobile zoos, abattoirs), and the public should recognize that animal contact is an important source of enteric illnesses in order to take measures to reduce the burden of illness from animal sources. BioMed Central 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5320741/ /pubmed/28222719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4135-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Whitfield, Yvonne Johnson, Karen Hobbs, Leigh Middleton, Dean Dhar, Badal Vrbova, Linda Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012 |
title | Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012 |
title_full | Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012 |
title_fullStr | Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012 |
title_full_unstemmed | Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012 |
title_short | Descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 – 2012 |
title_sort | descriptive study of enteric zoonoses in ontario, canada, from 2010 – 2012 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4135-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitfieldyvonne descriptivestudyofentericzoonosesinontariocanadafrom20102012 AT johnsonkaren descriptivestudyofentericzoonosesinontariocanadafrom20102012 AT hobbsleigh descriptivestudyofentericzoonosesinontariocanadafrom20102012 AT middletondean descriptivestudyofentericzoonosesinontariocanadafrom20102012 AT dharbadal descriptivestudyofentericzoonosesinontariocanadafrom20102012 AT vrbovalinda descriptivestudyofentericzoonosesinontariocanadafrom20102012 |