Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study
BACKGROUND: Guidelines on urinary incontinence recommend that absorbent products are only used as a coping strategy pending definitive treatment, as an adjunct to ongoing therapy, or for long-term management after all treatment options have been explored. However, these criteria are rarely met and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28239296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0204-8 |
_version_ | 1782509608597716992 |
---|---|
author | Jansen, Aaltje P. D. Muntinga, Maaike E. Bosmans, Judith E. Berghmans, Bary Dekker, Janny Hugtenburgh, Jacqueline Nijpels, Giel van Houten, Paul Laurant, Miranda G. H. van der Vaart, Huub C. H. |
author_facet | Jansen, Aaltje P. D. Muntinga, Maaike E. Bosmans, Judith E. Berghmans, Bary Dekker, Janny Hugtenburgh, Jacqueline Nijpels, Giel van Houten, Paul Laurant, Miranda G. H. van der Vaart, Huub C. H. |
author_sort | Jansen, Aaltje P. D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Guidelines on urinary incontinence recommend that absorbent products are only used as a coping strategy pending definitive treatment, as an adjunct to ongoing therapy, or for long-term management after all treatment options have been explored. However, these criteria are rarely met and a significant share of long-term product users could still benefit from therapeutic interventions recommended in guidelines for urinary incontinence. Better implementation of these guidelines can potentially result in both health benefits for women and long-term cost savings for society. The aim of the COCON study is to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care in comparison with usual care for urinary incontinent women aged 55 years and over who use absorbent products. METHODS: This randomised clinical trial compares usual care with a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care. Women (anticipated N = 160) are recruited in 12 community pharmacies in three Dutch regions, and are eligible for trial entry when they are 55 years and over, community-dwelling and long-term users of absorbent products (≥4 months) reimbursed by health insurance. Measurements are administered at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome is severity of urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI SF); other outcomes include health related quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), use of absorbent products (in accordance with the recommended criteria in guidelines) (yes/no), and societal costs. Mixed model analysis will be performed to compare (the course) of outcomes between groups. The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective. The implementation process is investigated using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework. DISCUSSION: Results will add to current knowledge of the (cost-)effectiveness of nurse-led primary healthcare to improve guideline-concordant care for older women with urinary incontinence. In addition, the results will provide more insight into care needs and health service utilization of this group of women, as well as into use of absorbent products in accordance with the recommended criteria in guidelines. Finally, results will increase our understanding of the intervention’s uptake and could provide useful insights for future dissemination and sustenance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR4396, registered 13-January-2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12912-017-0204-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5320796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53207962017-02-24 Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study Jansen, Aaltje P. D. Muntinga, Maaike E. Bosmans, Judith E. Berghmans, Bary Dekker, Janny Hugtenburgh, Jacqueline Nijpels, Giel van Houten, Paul Laurant, Miranda G. H. van der Vaart, Huub C. H. BMC Nurs Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Guidelines on urinary incontinence recommend that absorbent products are only used as a coping strategy pending definitive treatment, as an adjunct to ongoing therapy, or for long-term management after all treatment options have been explored. However, these criteria are rarely met and a significant share of long-term product users could still benefit from therapeutic interventions recommended in guidelines for urinary incontinence. Better implementation of these guidelines can potentially result in both health benefits for women and long-term cost savings for society. The aim of the COCON study is to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care in comparison with usual care for urinary incontinent women aged 55 years and over who use absorbent products. METHODS: This randomised clinical trial compares usual care with a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care. Women (anticipated N = 160) are recruited in 12 community pharmacies in three Dutch regions, and are eligible for trial entry when they are 55 years and over, community-dwelling and long-term users of absorbent products (≥4 months) reimbursed by health insurance. Measurements are administered at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome is severity of urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI SF); other outcomes include health related quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), use of absorbent products (in accordance with the recommended criteria in guidelines) (yes/no), and societal costs. Mixed model analysis will be performed to compare (the course) of outcomes between groups. The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective. The implementation process is investigated using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework. DISCUSSION: Results will add to current knowledge of the (cost-)effectiveness of nurse-led primary healthcare to improve guideline-concordant care for older women with urinary incontinence. In addition, the results will provide more insight into care needs and health service utilization of this group of women, as well as into use of absorbent products in accordance with the recommended criteria in guidelines. Finally, results will increase our understanding of the intervention’s uptake and could provide useful insights for future dissemination and sustenance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR4396, registered 13-January-2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12912-017-0204-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5320796/ /pubmed/28239296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0204-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Jansen, Aaltje P. D. Muntinga, Maaike E. Bosmans, Judith E. Berghmans, Bary Dekker, Janny Hugtenburgh, Jacqueline Nijpels, Giel van Houten, Paul Laurant, Miranda G. H. van der Vaart, Huub C. H. Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study |
title | Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: Study protocol of the COCON study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to optimise implementation of guideline-concordant continence care: study protocol of the cocon study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28239296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0204-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jansenaaltjepd costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT muntingamaaikee costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT bosmansjudithe costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT berghmansbary costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT dekkerjanny costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT hugtenburghjacqueline costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT nijpelsgiel costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT vanhoutenpaul costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT laurantmirandagh costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy AT vandervaarthuubch costeffectivenessofanurseledinterventiontooptimiseimplementationofguidelineconcordantcontinencecarestudyprotocolofthecoconstudy |