Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Reduction of viraemia in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection using nucleoside/nucleotide analogues reduces fatal liver disease-related events, but development of resistance in virus presents serious clinical challenge. Therefore, comparative evaluatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Manjita, Singh, Neha, Dixit, Vinod Kumar, Nath, Gopal, Jain, Ashok Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.198674
_version_ 1782509620381614080
author Srivastava, Manjita
Singh, Neha
Dixit, Vinod Kumar
Nath, Gopal
Jain, Ashok Kumar
author_facet Srivastava, Manjita
Singh, Neha
Dixit, Vinod Kumar
Nath, Gopal
Jain, Ashok Kumar
author_sort Srivastava, Manjita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Reduction of viraemia in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection using nucleoside/nucleotide analogues reduces fatal liver disease-related events, but development of resistance in virus presents serious clinical challenge. Therefore, comparative evaluation of prolonged antiviral monotherapy and combination therapies was prospectively studied to assess their influence on viral suppression, rapidity of response, development of drug resistance and surfacing mutants in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients. METHODS: A total of 158 (62eAg-ve) chronic hepatitis B patients were prospectively studied for 24 months. Final analysis was performed on patients treated with lamivudine (LAM, n = 28), adefovirdipivoxil (ADV, n = 24), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, n = 26), entecavir (ETV, n = 25), LAM + ADV (n = 28) and LAM + TDF (n = 27). Quantitative hepatitis B virus DNA was detected using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Multiple comparisons among drugs and genotypic mutations were analyzed. RESULTS: Progressive biochemical and virological response were noted with all the regimens at 24 months except LAM and ADV which were associated with viral breakthrough (VBT) in 46.4 and 25 per cent, respectively. Mutations: rtM204V (39.3%), M204V+L180M (10.7%) while rtA181V (8.1%) and rtN236T (8.3%) were observed with LAM and ADV regimen, respectively. LAM + ADV combination therapy revealed VBT in seven per cent of the cases without mutations whereas TDF, ETV and LAM + TDF therapies neither showed VBT nor mutations. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: LAM was the least potent drug among all therapeutic options followed by ADV. TDF and ETV were genetically stable antivirals with a strong efficacy. Among newer combination therapies, LAM + TDF revealed more efficacy in virological remission and acted as a profound genetic barrier on long term. Hence, newer generation molecules (TDF, ETV) and effective combination therapy should be a certain choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5320848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53208482017-03-01 Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study Srivastava, Manjita Singh, Neha Dixit, Vinod Kumar Nath, Gopal Jain, Ashok Kumar Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Reduction of viraemia in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection using nucleoside/nucleotide analogues reduces fatal liver disease-related events, but development of resistance in virus presents serious clinical challenge. Therefore, comparative evaluation of prolonged antiviral monotherapy and combination therapies was prospectively studied to assess their influence on viral suppression, rapidity of response, development of drug resistance and surfacing mutants in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients. METHODS: A total of 158 (62eAg-ve) chronic hepatitis B patients were prospectively studied for 24 months. Final analysis was performed on patients treated with lamivudine (LAM, n = 28), adefovirdipivoxil (ADV, n = 24), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, n = 26), entecavir (ETV, n = 25), LAM + ADV (n = 28) and LAM + TDF (n = 27). Quantitative hepatitis B virus DNA was detected using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Multiple comparisons among drugs and genotypic mutations were analyzed. RESULTS: Progressive biochemical and virological response were noted with all the regimens at 24 months except LAM and ADV which were associated with viral breakthrough (VBT) in 46.4 and 25 per cent, respectively. Mutations: rtM204V (39.3%), M204V+L180M (10.7%) while rtA181V (8.1%) and rtN236T (8.3%) were observed with LAM and ADV regimen, respectively. LAM + ADV combination therapy revealed VBT in seven per cent of the cases without mutations whereas TDF, ETV and LAM + TDF therapies neither showed VBT nor mutations. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: LAM was the least potent drug among all therapeutic options followed by ADV. TDF and ETV were genetically stable antivirals with a strong efficacy. Among newer combination therapies, LAM + TDF revealed more efficacy in virological remission and acted as a profound genetic barrier on long term. Hence, newer generation molecules (TDF, ETV) and effective combination therapy should be a certain choice. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5320848/ /pubmed/28139541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.198674 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Srivastava, Manjita
Singh, Neha
Dixit, Vinod Kumar
Nath, Gopal
Jain, Ashok Kumar
Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study
title Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study
title_full Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study
title_short Comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study
title_sort comparative evaluation of long-term monotherapies & combination therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis b: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5320848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.198674
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastavamanjita comparativeevaluationoflongtermmonotherapiescombinationtherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbapilotstudy
AT singhneha comparativeevaluationoflongtermmonotherapiescombinationtherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbapilotstudy
AT dixitvinodkumar comparativeevaluationoflongtermmonotherapiescombinationtherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbapilotstudy
AT nathgopal comparativeevaluationoflongtermmonotherapiescombinationtherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbapilotstudy
AT jainashokkumar comparativeevaluationoflongtermmonotherapiescombinationtherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbapilotstudy