Cargando…

Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage

BACKGROUND: A global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (GPELF) is underway, yet two key programmatic features are currently still lacking: (1) the extension of efforts to all lymphatic filariasis (LF) endemic countries, and (2) the expansion of geographic coverage of mass drug administrati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stone, Christopher M, Kastner, Randee, Steinmann, Peter, Chitnis, Nakul, Tanner, Marcel, Tediosi, Fabrizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5321305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000021
_version_ 1782509669168709632
author Stone, Christopher M
Kastner, Randee
Steinmann, Peter
Chitnis, Nakul
Tanner, Marcel
Tediosi, Fabrizio
author_facet Stone, Christopher M
Kastner, Randee
Steinmann, Peter
Chitnis, Nakul
Tanner, Marcel
Tediosi, Fabrizio
author_sort Stone, Christopher M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (GPELF) is underway, yet two key programmatic features are currently still lacking: (1) the extension of efforts to all lymphatic filariasis (LF) endemic countries, and (2) the expansion of geographic coverage of mass drug administration (MDA) within countries. For varying levels of scale-up of MDA, we assessed the health benefits and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) associated with LF eradication, projected the potential savings due to decreased morbidity management needs, and estimated potential household productivity gains as a result of reduced LF-related morbidity. METHODS: We extended an LF transmission model to track hydrocele and lymphoedema incidence in order to obtain estimates of the disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted due to scaling up MDA over a period of 50 years. We then estimated the ICERs and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves associated with different rates of MDA scale-up. Health systems savings were estimated by considering the averted morbidity, treatment-seeking behaviour and morbidity management costs. Gains in worker productivity were estimated by multiplying estimated working days lost as a result of morbidity with country-specific per-worker agricultural wages. RESULTS: Our projections indicate that a massive scaling-up of MDA could lead to 4.38 million incremental DALYs averted over a 50-year time horizon compared to a scenario which mirrors current efforts against LF. In comparison to maintaining the current rate of progress against LF, massive scaling-up of MDA—pursuing LF eradication as soon as possible—was most likely to be cost-effective above a willingness to pay threshold of US$71.5/DALY averted. Intensified MDA scale-up was also associated with lower ICERs. Furthermore, this could result in health systems savings up to US$483 million. Extending coverage to all endemic areas could generate additional economic benefits through gains in worker productivity between US$3.4 and US$14.4 billion. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to ethical and political motivations for scaling-up MDA rapidly, this analysis provides economic support for increasing the intensity of MDA programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5321305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53213052017-06-06 Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage Stone, Christopher M Kastner, Randee Steinmann, Peter Chitnis, Nakul Tanner, Marcel Tediosi, Fabrizio BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: A global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (GPELF) is underway, yet two key programmatic features are currently still lacking: (1) the extension of efforts to all lymphatic filariasis (LF) endemic countries, and (2) the expansion of geographic coverage of mass drug administration (MDA) within countries. For varying levels of scale-up of MDA, we assessed the health benefits and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) associated with LF eradication, projected the potential savings due to decreased morbidity management needs, and estimated potential household productivity gains as a result of reduced LF-related morbidity. METHODS: We extended an LF transmission model to track hydrocele and lymphoedema incidence in order to obtain estimates of the disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted due to scaling up MDA over a period of 50 years. We then estimated the ICERs and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves associated with different rates of MDA scale-up. Health systems savings were estimated by considering the averted morbidity, treatment-seeking behaviour and morbidity management costs. Gains in worker productivity were estimated by multiplying estimated working days lost as a result of morbidity with country-specific per-worker agricultural wages. RESULTS: Our projections indicate that a massive scaling-up of MDA could lead to 4.38 million incremental DALYs averted over a 50-year time horizon compared to a scenario which mirrors current efforts against LF. In comparison to maintaining the current rate of progress against LF, massive scaling-up of MDA—pursuing LF eradication as soon as possible—was most likely to be cost-effective above a willingness to pay threshold of US$71.5/DALY averted. Intensified MDA scale-up was also associated with lower ICERs. Furthermore, this could result in health systems savings up to US$483 million. Extending coverage to all endemic areas could generate additional economic benefits through gains in worker productivity between US$3.4 and US$14.4 billion. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to ethical and political motivations for scaling-up MDA rapidly, this analysis provides economic support for increasing the intensity of MDA programmes. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5321305/ /pubmed/28588916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000021 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Stone, Christopher M
Kastner, Randee
Steinmann, Peter
Chitnis, Nakul
Tanner, Marcel
Tediosi, Fabrizio
Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage
title Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage
title_full Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage
title_fullStr Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage
title_short Modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage
title_sort modelling the health impact and cost-effectiveness of lymphatic filariasis eradication under varying levels of mass drug administration scale-up and geographic coverage
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5321305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000021
work_keys_str_mv AT stonechristopherm modellingthehealthimpactandcosteffectivenessoflymphaticfilariasiseradicationundervaryinglevelsofmassdrugadministrationscaleupandgeographiccoverage
AT kastnerrandee modellingthehealthimpactandcosteffectivenessoflymphaticfilariasiseradicationundervaryinglevelsofmassdrugadministrationscaleupandgeographiccoverage
AT steinmannpeter modellingthehealthimpactandcosteffectivenessoflymphaticfilariasiseradicationundervaryinglevelsofmassdrugadministrationscaleupandgeographiccoverage
AT chitnisnakul modellingthehealthimpactandcosteffectivenessoflymphaticfilariasiseradicationundervaryinglevelsofmassdrugadministrationscaleupandgeographiccoverage
AT tannermarcel modellingthehealthimpactandcosteffectivenessoflymphaticfilariasiseradicationundervaryinglevelsofmassdrugadministrationscaleupandgeographiccoverage
AT tediosifabrizio modellingthehealthimpactandcosteffectivenessoflymphaticfilariasiseradicationundervaryinglevelsofmassdrugadministrationscaleupandgeographiccoverage