Cargando…

Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVF) are the most commonly acquired fistulas of the urinary tract, but we lack a standardized algorithm for their management. Surgery is the most commonly preferred approach to treat women with primary VVF following benign gynaecologic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To carry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodner-Adler, Barbara, Hanzal, Engelbert, Pablik, Eleonore, Koelbl, Heinz, Bodner, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5321457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28225769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171554
_version_ 1782509703100628992
author Bodner-Adler, Barbara
Hanzal, Engelbert
Pablik, Eleonore
Koelbl, Heinz
Bodner, Klaus
author_facet Bodner-Adler, Barbara
Hanzal, Engelbert
Pablik, Eleonore
Koelbl, Heinz
Bodner, Klaus
author_sort Bodner-Adler, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVF) are the most commonly acquired fistulas of the urinary tract, but we lack a standardized algorithm for their management. Surgery is the most commonly preferred approach to treat women with primary VVF following benign gynaecologic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of operative techniques or conservative treatment for patients with postsurgical VVF. Our secondary objective was to define the surgical time and determine the types of study designs. METHODS: PubMed, Old Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used as data sources. This systematic review was modelled on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, including a registration number (CRD42012002097). RESULTS: We reviewed 282 full text articles to identify 124 studies for inclusion. In all, 1379/1430 (96.4%) patients were treated surgically. Overall, the transvaginal approach was performed in the majority of patients (39%), followed by a transabdominal/transvesical route (36%), a laparoscopic/robotic approach (15%) and a combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in 3% of cases. Success rate of conservative treatment was 92.86% (95%CI: 79.54–99.89), 97.98% in surgical cases (95% CI: 96.13–99.29) and 91.63% (95% CI: 87.68–97.03) in patients with prolonged catheter drainage followed by surgery. 79/124 studies (63.7%) provided information for the length of follow-up, but showed a poor reporting standard regarding prognosis. Complications were studied only selectively. Due to the inconsistency of these data it was impossible to analyse them collectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the literature is imprecise and inconsistent, existing studies indicate that operation, mainly through a transvaginal approach, is the most commonly preferred treatment strategy in females with postsurgical VVF. Our data showed no clear odds-on favorite regarding disease management as well as surgical approach and current evidence on the surgical management of VVF does not allow any accurate estimation of success and complication rates. Standardisation of the terminology is required so that VVF can be managed with a proper surgical treatment algorithm based on characteristics of the fistula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5321457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53214572017-03-09 Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Bodner-Adler, Barbara Hanzal, Engelbert Pablik, Eleonore Koelbl, Heinz Bodner, Klaus PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVF) are the most commonly acquired fistulas of the urinary tract, but we lack a standardized algorithm for their management. Surgery is the most commonly preferred approach to treat women with primary VVF following benign gynaecologic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of operative techniques or conservative treatment for patients with postsurgical VVF. Our secondary objective was to define the surgical time and determine the types of study designs. METHODS: PubMed, Old Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used as data sources. This systematic review was modelled on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, including a registration number (CRD42012002097). RESULTS: We reviewed 282 full text articles to identify 124 studies for inclusion. In all, 1379/1430 (96.4%) patients were treated surgically. Overall, the transvaginal approach was performed in the majority of patients (39%), followed by a transabdominal/transvesical route (36%), a laparoscopic/robotic approach (15%) and a combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in 3% of cases. Success rate of conservative treatment was 92.86% (95%CI: 79.54–99.89), 97.98% in surgical cases (95% CI: 96.13–99.29) and 91.63% (95% CI: 87.68–97.03) in patients with prolonged catheter drainage followed by surgery. 79/124 studies (63.7%) provided information for the length of follow-up, but showed a poor reporting standard regarding prognosis. Complications were studied only selectively. Due to the inconsistency of these data it was impossible to analyse them collectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the literature is imprecise and inconsistent, existing studies indicate that operation, mainly through a transvaginal approach, is the most commonly preferred treatment strategy in females with postsurgical VVF. Our data showed no clear odds-on favorite regarding disease management as well as surgical approach and current evidence on the surgical management of VVF does not allow any accurate estimation of success and complication rates. Standardisation of the terminology is required so that VVF can be managed with a proper surgical treatment algorithm based on characteristics of the fistula. Public Library of Science 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5321457/ /pubmed/28225769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171554 Text en © 2017 Bodner-Adler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bodner-Adler, Barbara
Hanzal, Engelbert
Pablik, Eleonore
Koelbl, Heinz
Bodner, Klaus
Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort management of vesicovaginal fistulas (vvfs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5321457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28225769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171554
work_keys_str_mv AT bodneradlerbarbara managementofvesicovaginalfistulasvvfsinwomenfollowingbenigngynaecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanzalengelbert managementofvesicovaginalfistulasvvfsinwomenfollowingbenigngynaecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pablikeleonore managementofvesicovaginalfistulasvvfsinwomenfollowingbenigngynaecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT koelblheinz managementofvesicovaginalfistulasvvfsinwomenfollowingbenigngynaecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bodnerklaus managementofvesicovaginalfistulasvvfsinwomenfollowingbenigngynaecologicsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis