Cargando…
The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of posterior iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implant for correction of aphakia in eyes with inadequate capsular support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective case series of 108 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28112126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.198843 |
_version_ | 1782509901126303744 |
---|---|
author | Jare, Nana Madhukar Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh Gadkari, Salil S Deshpande, Madan D |
author_facet | Jare, Nana Madhukar Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh Gadkari, Salil S Deshpande, Madan D |
author_sort | Jare, Nana Madhukar |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of posterior iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implant for correction of aphakia in eyes with inadequate capsular support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective case series of 108 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support which underwent posterior iris-claw IOL with a 6-month follow-up period was conducted. The cases belonged to two clinical settings: elective secondary implantation and those with intraoperative posterior dislocation of cataractous lens or IOL. Main outcome measures were visual acuity, anterior chamber reaction, stability of IOL, endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure (IOP), and cystoid macular edema (CME). RESULTS: The mean best-corrected visual acuity was LogMAR 0.25. None had chronic anterior chamber inflammation. The mean difference in central endothelial counts before surgery and 1 month after surgery was 104.21 cell/mm(2) (4.92%). There was no statistically significant difference in central endothelial cell count at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.91) and also in the central macular thickness at preoperative and after 6 months suggestive of CME (P = 0.078). Three eyes had raised IOP which were managed with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser peripheral iridotomy. There were no IOL dislocations or other adverse events in our series. CONCLUSION: Posterior chamber iris-claw lenses are a good option in eyes with inadequate posterior capsular support. Chronic inflammation, poor lens stability, or significant central endothelial cell loss was not observed during the 6-month follow-up period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5322700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53227002017-03-01 The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up Jare, Nana Madhukar Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh Gadkari, Salil S Deshpande, Madan D Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of posterior iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implant for correction of aphakia in eyes with inadequate capsular support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective case series of 108 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support which underwent posterior iris-claw IOL with a 6-month follow-up period was conducted. The cases belonged to two clinical settings: elective secondary implantation and those with intraoperative posterior dislocation of cataractous lens or IOL. Main outcome measures were visual acuity, anterior chamber reaction, stability of IOL, endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure (IOP), and cystoid macular edema (CME). RESULTS: The mean best-corrected visual acuity was LogMAR 0.25. None had chronic anterior chamber inflammation. The mean difference in central endothelial counts before surgery and 1 month after surgery was 104.21 cell/mm(2) (4.92%). There was no statistically significant difference in central endothelial cell count at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.91) and also in the central macular thickness at preoperative and after 6 months suggestive of CME (P = 0.078). Three eyes had raised IOP which were managed with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser peripheral iridotomy. There were no IOL dislocations or other adverse events in our series. CONCLUSION: Posterior chamber iris-claw lenses are a good option in eyes with inadequate posterior capsular support. Chronic inflammation, poor lens stability, or significant central endothelial cell loss was not observed during the 6-month follow-up period. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5322700/ /pubmed/28112126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.198843 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jare, Nana Madhukar Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh Gadkari, Salil S Deshpande, Madan D The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up |
title | The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up |
title_full | The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up |
title_fullStr | The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up |
title_short | The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up |
title_sort | posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28112126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.198843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarenanamadhukar theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup AT kesariashwiniganesh theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup AT gadkarisalils theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup AT deshpandemadand theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup AT jarenanamadhukar posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup AT kesariashwiniganesh posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup AT gadkarisalils posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup AT deshpandemadand posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup |