Cargando…

The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of posterior iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implant for correction of aphakia in eyes with inadequate capsular support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective case series of 108 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jare, Nana Madhukar, Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh, Gadkari, Salil S, Deshpande, Madan D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28112126
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.198843
_version_ 1782509901126303744
author Jare, Nana Madhukar
Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh
Gadkari, Salil S
Deshpande, Madan D
author_facet Jare, Nana Madhukar
Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh
Gadkari, Salil S
Deshpande, Madan D
author_sort Jare, Nana Madhukar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of posterior iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implant for correction of aphakia in eyes with inadequate capsular support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective case series of 108 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support which underwent posterior iris-claw IOL with a 6-month follow-up period was conducted. The cases belonged to two clinical settings: elective secondary implantation and those with intraoperative posterior dislocation of cataractous lens or IOL. Main outcome measures were visual acuity, anterior chamber reaction, stability of IOL, endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure (IOP), and cystoid macular edema (CME). RESULTS: The mean best-corrected visual acuity was LogMAR 0.25. None had chronic anterior chamber inflammation. The mean difference in central endothelial counts before surgery and 1 month after surgery was 104.21 cell/mm(2) (4.92%). There was no statistically significant difference in central endothelial cell count at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.91) and also in the central macular thickness at preoperative and after 6 months suggestive of CME (P = 0.078). Three eyes had raised IOP which were managed with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser peripheral iridotomy. There were no IOL dislocations or other adverse events in our series. CONCLUSION: Posterior chamber iris-claw lenses are a good option in eyes with inadequate posterior capsular support. Chronic inflammation, poor lens stability, or significant central endothelial cell loss was not observed during the 6-month follow-up period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5322700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53227002017-03-01 The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up Jare, Nana Madhukar Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh Gadkari, Salil S Deshpande, Madan D Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of posterior iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implant for correction of aphakia in eyes with inadequate capsular support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective case series of 108 aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support which underwent posterior iris-claw IOL with a 6-month follow-up period was conducted. The cases belonged to two clinical settings: elective secondary implantation and those with intraoperative posterior dislocation of cataractous lens or IOL. Main outcome measures were visual acuity, anterior chamber reaction, stability of IOL, endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure (IOP), and cystoid macular edema (CME). RESULTS: The mean best-corrected visual acuity was LogMAR 0.25. None had chronic anterior chamber inflammation. The mean difference in central endothelial counts before surgery and 1 month after surgery was 104.21 cell/mm(2) (4.92%). There was no statistically significant difference in central endothelial cell count at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.91) and also in the central macular thickness at preoperative and after 6 months suggestive of CME (P = 0.078). Three eyes had raised IOP which were managed with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser peripheral iridotomy. There were no IOL dislocations or other adverse events in our series. CONCLUSION: Posterior chamber iris-claw lenses are a good option in eyes with inadequate posterior capsular support. Chronic inflammation, poor lens stability, or significant central endothelial cell loss was not observed during the 6-month follow-up period. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5322700/ /pubmed/28112126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.198843 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jare, Nana Madhukar
Kesari, Ashwini Ganesh
Gadkari, Salil S
Deshpande, Madan D
The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
title The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
title_full The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
title_fullStr The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
title_full_unstemmed The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
title_short The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
title_sort posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28112126
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.198843
work_keys_str_mv AT jarenanamadhukar theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup
AT kesariashwiniganesh theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup
AT gadkarisalils theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup
AT deshpandemadand theposterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup
AT jarenanamadhukar posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup
AT kesariashwiniganesh posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup
AT gadkarisalils posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup
AT deshpandemadand posterioririsclawlensoutcomestudy6monthfollowup