Cargando…

Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market

Using an agent-based model we examine the dynamics of stock price fluctuations and their rates of return in an artificial financial market composed of fundamentalist and chartist agents with and without confidence. We find that chartist agents who are confident generate higher price and rate of retu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertella, Mario A., Pires, Felipe R., Rego, Henio H. A., Silva, Jonathas N., Vodenska, Irena, Stanley, H. Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172258
_version_ 1782509935745040384
author Bertella, Mario A.
Pires, Felipe R.
Rego, Henio H. A.
Silva, Jonathas N.
Vodenska, Irena
Stanley, H. Eugene
author_facet Bertella, Mario A.
Pires, Felipe R.
Rego, Henio H. A.
Silva, Jonathas N.
Vodenska, Irena
Stanley, H. Eugene
author_sort Bertella, Mario A.
collection PubMed
description Using an agent-based model we examine the dynamics of stock price fluctuations and their rates of return in an artificial financial market composed of fundamentalist and chartist agents with and without confidence. We find that chartist agents who are confident generate higher price and rate of return volatilities than those who are not. We also find that kurtosis and skewness are lower in our simulation study of agents who are not confident. We show that the stock price and confidence index—both generated by our model—are cointegrated and that stock price affects confidence index but confidence index does not affect stock price. We next compare the results of our model with the S&P 500 index and its respective stock market confidence index using cointegration and Granger tests. As in our model, we find that stock prices drive their respective confidence indices, but that the opposite relationship, i.e., the assumption that confidence indices drive stock prices, is not significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5322910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53229102017-03-09 Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market Bertella, Mario A. Pires, Felipe R. Rego, Henio H. A. Silva, Jonathas N. Vodenska, Irena Stanley, H. Eugene PLoS One Research Article Using an agent-based model we examine the dynamics of stock price fluctuations and their rates of return in an artificial financial market composed of fundamentalist and chartist agents with and without confidence. We find that chartist agents who are confident generate higher price and rate of return volatilities than those who are not. We also find that kurtosis and skewness are lower in our simulation study of agents who are not confident. We show that the stock price and confidence index—both generated by our model—are cointegrated and that stock price affects confidence index but confidence index does not affect stock price. We next compare the results of our model with the S&P 500 index and its respective stock market confidence index using cointegration and Granger tests. As in our model, we find that stock prices drive their respective confidence indices, but that the opposite relationship, i.e., the assumption that confidence indices drive stock prices, is not significant. Public Library of Science 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5322910/ /pubmed/28231255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172258 Text en © 2017 Bertella et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bertella, Mario A.
Pires, Felipe R.
Rego, Henio H. A.
Silva, Jonathas N.
Vodenska, Irena
Stanley, H. Eugene
Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market
title Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market
title_full Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market
title_fullStr Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market
title_full_unstemmed Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market
title_short Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market
title_sort confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172258
work_keys_str_mv AT bertellamarioa confidenceandselfattributionbiasinanartificialstockmarket
AT piresfeliper confidenceandselfattributionbiasinanartificialstockmarket
AT regohenioha confidenceandselfattributionbiasinanartificialstockmarket
AT silvajonathasn confidenceandselfattributionbiasinanartificialstockmarket
AT vodenskairena confidenceandselfattributionbiasinanartificialstockmarket
AT stanleyheugene confidenceandselfattributionbiasinanartificialstockmarket