Cargando…

Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water

To prevent Ebola transmission, frequent handwashing is recommended in Ebola Treatment Units and communities. However, little is known about which handwashing protocol is most efficacious. We evaluated six handwashing protocols (soap and water, alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), and 0.05% sodium di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolfe, Marlene K., Gallandat, Karin, Daniels, Kyle, Desmarais, Anne Marie, Scheinman, Pamela, Lantagne, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172734
_version_ 1782509936466460672
author Wolfe, Marlene K.
Gallandat, Karin
Daniels, Kyle
Desmarais, Anne Marie
Scheinman, Pamela
Lantagne, Daniele
author_facet Wolfe, Marlene K.
Gallandat, Karin
Daniels, Kyle
Desmarais, Anne Marie
Scheinman, Pamela
Lantagne, Daniele
author_sort Wolfe, Marlene K.
collection PubMed
description To prevent Ebola transmission, frequent handwashing is recommended in Ebola Treatment Units and communities. However, little is known about which handwashing protocol is most efficacious. We evaluated six handwashing protocols (soap and water, alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), and 0.05% sodium dichloroisocyanurate, high-test hypochlorite, and stabilized and non-stabilized sodium hypochlorite solutions) for 1) efficacy of handwashing on the removal and inactivation of non-pathogenic model organisms and, 2) persistence of organisms in rinse water. Model organisms E. coli and bacteriophage Phi6 were used to evaluate handwashing with and without organic load added to simulate bodily fluids. Hands were inoculated with test organisms, washed, and rinsed using a glove juice method to retrieve remaining organisms. Impact was estimated by comparing the log reduction in organisms after handwashing to the log reduction without handwashing. Rinse water was collected to test for persistence of organisms. Handwashing resulted in a 1.94–3.01 log reduction in E. coli concentration without, and 2.18–3.34 with, soil load; and a 2.44–3.06 log reduction in Phi6 without, and 2.71–3.69 with, soil load. HTH performed most consistently well, with significantly greater log reductions than other handwashing protocols in three models. However, the magnitude of handwashing efficacy differences was small, suggesting protocols are similarly efficacious. Rinse water demonstrated a 0.28–4.77 log reduction in remaining E. coli without, and 0.21–4.49 with, soil load and a 1.26–2.02 log reduction in Phi6 without, and 1.30–2.20 with, soil load. Chlorine resulted in significantly less persistence of E. coli in both conditions and Phi6 without soil load in rinse water (p<0.001). Thus, chlorine-based methods may offer a benefit of reducing persistence in rinse water. We recommend responders use the most practical handwashing method to ensure hand hygiene in Ebola contexts, considering the potential benefit of chlorine-based methods in rinse water persistence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5322913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53229132017-03-09 Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water Wolfe, Marlene K. Gallandat, Karin Daniels, Kyle Desmarais, Anne Marie Scheinman, Pamela Lantagne, Daniele PLoS One Research Article To prevent Ebola transmission, frequent handwashing is recommended in Ebola Treatment Units and communities. However, little is known about which handwashing protocol is most efficacious. We evaluated six handwashing protocols (soap and water, alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), and 0.05% sodium dichloroisocyanurate, high-test hypochlorite, and stabilized and non-stabilized sodium hypochlorite solutions) for 1) efficacy of handwashing on the removal and inactivation of non-pathogenic model organisms and, 2) persistence of organisms in rinse water. Model organisms E. coli and bacteriophage Phi6 were used to evaluate handwashing with and without organic load added to simulate bodily fluids. Hands were inoculated with test organisms, washed, and rinsed using a glove juice method to retrieve remaining organisms. Impact was estimated by comparing the log reduction in organisms after handwashing to the log reduction without handwashing. Rinse water was collected to test for persistence of organisms. Handwashing resulted in a 1.94–3.01 log reduction in E. coli concentration without, and 2.18–3.34 with, soil load; and a 2.44–3.06 log reduction in Phi6 without, and 2.71–3.69 with, soil load. HTH performed most consistently well, with significantly greater log reductions than other handwashing protocols in three models. However, the magnitude of handwashing efficacy differences was small, suggesting protocols are similarly efficacious. Rinse water demonstrated a 0.28–4.77 log reduction in remaining E. coli without, and 0.21–4.49 with, soil load and a 1.26–2.02 log reduction in Phi6 without, and 1.30–2.20 with, soil load. Chlorine resulted in significantly less persistence of E. coli in both conditions and Phi6 without soil load in rinse water (p<0.001). Thus, chlorine-based methods may offer a benefit of reducing persistence in rinse water. We recommend responders use the most practical handwashing method to ensure hand hygiene in Ebola contexts, considering the potential benefit of chlorine-based methods in rinse water persistence. Public Library of Science 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5322913/ /pubmed/28231311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172734 Text en © 2017 Wolfe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wolfe, Marlene K.
Gallandat, Karin
Daniels, Kyle
Desmarais, Anne Marie
Scheinman, Pamela
Lantagne, Daniele
Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water
title Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water
title_full Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water
title_fullStr Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water
title_full_unstemmed Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water
title_short Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water
title_sort handwashing and ebola virus disease outbreaks: a randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms phi6 and e. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172734
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfemarlenek handwashingandebolavirusdiseaseoutbreaksarandomizedcomparisonofsoaphandsanitizerand005chlorinesolutionsontheinactivationandremovalofmodelorganismsphi6andecolifromhandsandpersistenceinrinsewater
AT gallandatkarin handwashingandebolavirusdiseaseoutbreaksarandomizedcomparisonofsoaphandsanitizerand005chlorinesolutionsontheinactivationandremovalofmodelorganismsphi6andecolifromhandsandpersistenceinrinsewater
AT danielskyle handwashingandebolavirusdiseaseoutbreaksarandomizedcomparisonofsoaphandsanitizerand005chlorinesolutionsontheinactivationandremovalofmodelorganismsphi6andecolifromhandsandpersistenceinrinsewater
AT desmaraisannemarie handwashingandebolavirusdiseaseoutbreaksarandomizedcomparisonofsoaphandsanitizerand005chlorinesolutionsontheinactivationandremovalofmodelorganismsphi6andecolifromhandsandpersistenceinrinsewater
AT scheinmanpamela handwashingandebolavirusdiseaseoutbreaksarandomizedcomparisonofsoaphandsanitizerand005chlorinesolutionsontheinactivationandremovalofmodelorganismsphi6andecolifromhandsandpersistenceinrinsewater
AT lantagnedaniele handwashingandebolavirusdiseaseoutbreaksarandomizedcomparisonofsoaphandsanitizerand005chlorinesolutionsontheinactivationandremovalofmodelorganismsphi6andecolifromhandsandpersistenceinrinsewater