Cargando…

Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma

BACKGROUND: Assays have been developed for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation using plasma samples. Large scale surveillance programs are planned using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens for incidence assessment. However, limited information exists on the performance of HIV cross-sectional incid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlusser, Katherine E., Pilcher, Christopher, Kallas, Esper G., Santos, Breno R., Deeks, Steven G., Facente, Shelley, Keating, Sheila M., Busch, Michael P., Murphy, Gary, Welte, Alex, Quinn, Thomas, Eshleman, Susan H., Laeyendecker, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172283
_version_ 1782509937173200896
author Schlusser, Katherine E.
Pilcher, Christopher
Kallas, Esper G.
Santos, Breno R.
Deeks, Steven G.
Facente, Shelley
Keating, Sheila M.
Busch, Michael P.
Murphy, Gary
Welte, Alex
Quinn, Thomas
Eshleman, Susan H.
Laeyendecker, Oliver
author_facet Schlusser, Katherine E.
Pilcher, Christopher
Kallas, Esper G.
Santos, Breno R.
Deeks, Steven G.
Facente, Shelley
Keating, Sheila M.
Busch, Michael P.
Murphy, Gary
Welte, Alex
Quinn, Thomas
Eshleman, Susan H.
Laeyendecker, Oliver
author_sort Schlusser, Katherine E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assays have been developed for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation using plasma samples. Large scale surveillance programs are planned using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens for incidence assessment. However, limited information exists on the performance of HIV cross-sectional incidence assays using DBS. METHODS: The assays evaluated were: Maxim HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA (LAg-Avidity), Sedia HIV-1 BED-Capture EIA (BED-CEIA), and CDC modified BioRad HIV-1/2 Plus O Avidity-based Assay (CDC-BioRad Avidity) using pre-determined cutoff values. 100 matched HIV-1 positive plasma and DBS samples, with known duration of infection, from the Consortium for the Evaluation and Performance of HIV Incidence Assays repository were tested. All assays were run in duplicate. To examine the degree of variability within and between results for each sample type, both categorical and continuous results were analyzed. Associations were assessed with Bland Altman, R(2) values and Cohen’s kappa coefficient (ĸ). RESULTS: Intra-assay variability using the same sample type was similar for all assays (R(2) 0.96 to 1.00). The R(2) values comparing DBS and plasma results for LAg-Avidity, BED-CEIA, and CDC-BioRad Avidity were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.84, respectively. The concordance and ĸ values between DBS and plasma for all three assays were >87% and >0.64, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis showed significant differences between plasma and DBS samples. For all three assays, a higher number of samples were classified as recent infections using DBS samples. CONCLUSIONS: DBS and plasma sample results were highly correlated. However, when compared to plasma, each assay performed somewhat differently in DBS at the lower and higher ends of the dynamic range. DBS samples were more likely to be classified as recently infected by all three assays, which may lead to overestimation of incidence in surveys using performance criteria derived for plasma samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5322916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53229162017-03-09 Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma Schlusser, Katherine E. Pilcher, Christopher Kallas, Esper G. Santos, Breno R. Deeks, Steven G. Facente, Shelley Keating, Sheila M. Busch, Michael P. Murphy, Gary Welte, Alex Quinn, Thomas Eshleman, Susan H. Laeyendecker, Oliver PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Assays have been developed for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation using plasma samples. Large scale surveillance programs are planned using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens for incidence assessment. However, limited information exists on the performance of HIV cross-sectional incidence assays using DBS. METHODS: The assays evaluated were: Maxim HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA (LAg-Avidity), Sedia HIV-1 BED-Capture EIA (BED-CEIA), and CDC modified BioRad HIV-1/2 Plus O Avidity-based Assay (CDC-BioRad Avidity) using pre-determined cutoff values. 100 matched HIV-1 positive plasma and DBS samples, with known duration of infection, from the Consortium for the Evaluation and Performance of HIV Incidence Assays repository were tested. All assays were run in duplicate. To examine the degree of variability within and between results for each sample type, both categorical and continuous results were analyzed. Associations were assessed with Bland Altman, R(2) values and Cohen’s kappa coefficient (ĸ). RESULTS: Intra-assay variability using the same sample type was similar for all assays (R(2) 0.96 to 1.00). The R(2) values comparing DBS and plasma results for LAg-Avidity, BED-CEIA, and CDC-BioRad Avidity were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.84, respectively. The concordance and ĸ values between DBS and plasma for all three assays were >87% and >0.64, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis showed significant differences between plasma and DBS samples. For all three assays, a higher number of samples were classified as recent infections using DBS samples. CONCLUSIONS: DBS and plasma sample results were highly correlated. However, when compared to plasma, each assay performed somewhat differently in DBS at the lower and higher ends of the dynamic range. DBS samples were more likely to be classified as recently infected by all three assays, which may lead to overestimation of incidence in surveys using performance criteria derived for plasma samples. Public Library of Science 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5322916/ /pubmed/28231277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172283 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schlusser, Katherine E.
Pilcher, Christopher
Kallas, Esper G.
Santos, Breno R.
Deeks, Steven G.
Facente, Shelley
Keating, Sheila M.
Busch, Michael P.
Murphy, Gary
Welte, Alex
Quinn, Thomas
Eshleman, Susan H.
Laeyendecker, Oliver
Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
title Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
title_full Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
title_fullStr Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
title_short Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
title_sort comparison of cross-sectional hiv incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172283
work_keys_str_mv AT schlusserkatherinee comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT pilcherchristopher comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT kallasesperg comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT santosbrenor comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT deekssteveng comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT facenteshelley comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT keatingsheilam comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT buschmichaelp comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT murphygary comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT weltealex comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT quinnthomas comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT eshlemansusanh comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma
AT laeyendeckeroliver comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma