Cargando…
Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma
BACKGROUND: Assays have been developed for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation using plasma samples. Large scale surveillance programs are planned using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens for incidence assessment. However, limited information exists on the performance of HIV cross-sectional incid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172283 |
_version_ | 1782509937173200896 |
---|---|
author | Schlusser, Katherine E. Pilcher, Christopher Kallas, Esper G. Santos, Breno R. Deeks, Steven G. Facente, Shelley Keating, Sheila M. Busch, Michael P. Murphy, Gary Welte, Alex Quinn, Thomas Eshleman, Susan H. Laeyendecker, Oliver |
author_facet | Schlusser, Katherine E. Pilcher, Christopher Kallas, Esper G. Santos, Breno R. Deeks, Steven G. Facente, Shelley Keating, Sheila M. Busch, Michael P. Murphy, Gary Welte, Alex Quinn, Thomas Eshleman, Susan H. Laeyendecker, Oliver |
author_sort | Schlusser, Katherine E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assays have been developed for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation using plasma samples. Large scale surveillance programs are planned using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens for incidence assessment. However, limited information exists on the performance of HIV cross-sectional incidence assays using DBS. METHODS: The assays evaluated were: Maxim HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA (LAg-Avidity), Sedia HIV-1 BED-Capture EIA (BED-CEIA), and CDC modified BioRad HIV-1/2 Plus O Avidity-based Assay (CDC-BioRad Avidity) using pre-determined cutoff values. 100 matched HIV-1 positive plasma and DBS samples, with known duration of infection, from the Consortium for the Evaluation and Performance of HIV Incidence Assays repository were tested. All assays were run in duplicate. To examine the degree of variability within and between results for each sample type, both categorical and continuous results were analyzed. Associations were assessed with Bland Altman, R(2) values and Cohen’s kappa coefficient (ĸ). RESULTS: Intra-assay variability using the same sample type was similar for all assays (R(2) 0.96 to 1.00). The R(2) values comparing DBS and plasma results for LAg-Avidity, BED-CEIA, and CDC-BioRad Avidity were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.84, respectively. The concordance and ĸ values between DBS and plasma for all three assays were >87% and >0.64, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis showed significant differences between plasma and DBS samples. For all three assays, a higher number of samples were classified as recent infections using DBS samples. CONCLUSIONS: DBS and plasma sample results were highly correlated. However, when compared to plasma, each assay performed somewhat differently in DBS at the lower and higher ends of the dynamic range. DBS samples were more likely to be classified as recently infected by all three assays, which may lead to overestimation of incidence in surveys using performance criteria derived for plasma samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5322916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53229162017-03-09 Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma Schlusser, Katherine E. Pilcher, Christopher Kallas, Esper G. Santos, Breno R. Deeks, Steven G. Facente, Shelley Keating, Sheila M. Busch, Michael P. Murphy, Gary Welte, Alex Quinn, Thomas Eshleman, Susan H. Laeyendecker, Oliver PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Assays have been developed for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation using plasma samples. Large scale surveillance programs are planned using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens for incidence assessment. However, limited information exists on the performance of HIV cross-sectional incidence assays using DBS. METHODS: The assays evaluated were: Maxim HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA (LAg-Avidity), Sedia HIV-1 BED-Capture EIA (BED-CEIA), and CDC modified BioRad HIV-1/2 Plus O Avidity-based Assay (CDC-BioRad Avidity) using pre-determined cutoff values. 100 matched HIV-1 positive plasma and DBS samples, with known duration of infection, from the Consortium for the Evaluation and Performance of HIV Incidence Assays repository were tested. All assays were run in duplicate. To examine the degree of variability within and between results for each sample type, both categorical and continuous results were analyzed. Associations were assessed with Bland Altman, R(2) values and Cohen’s kappa coefficient (ĸ). RESULTS: Intra-assay variability using the same sample type was similar for all assays (R(2) 0.96 to 1.00). The R(2) values comparing DBS and plasma results for LAg-Avidity, BED-CEIA, and CDC-BioRad Avidity were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.84, respectively. The concordance and ĸ values between DBS and plasma for all three assays were >87% and >0.64, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis showed significant differences between plasma and DBS samples. For all three assays, a higher number of samples were classified as recent infections using DBS samples. CONCLUSIONS: DBS and plasma sample results were highly correlated. However, when compared to plasma, each assay performed somewhat differently in DBS at the lower and higher ends of the dynamic range. DBS samples were more likely to be classified as recently infected by all three assays, which may lead to overestimation of incidence in surveys using performance criteria derived for plasma samples. Public Library of Science 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5322916/ /pubmed/28231277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172283 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schlusser, Katherine E. Pilcher, Christopher Kallas, Esper G. Santos, Breno R. Deeks, Steven G. Facente, Shelley Keating, Sheila M. Busch, Michael P. Murphy, Gary Welte, Alex Quinn, Thomas Eshleman, Susan H. Laeyendecker, Oliver Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma |
title | Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma |
title_full | Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma |
title_short | Comparison of cross-sectional HIV incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma |
title_sort | comparison of cross-sectional hiv incidence assay results from dried blood spots and plasma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5322916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schlusserkatherinee comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT pilcherchristopher comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT kallasesperg comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT santosbrenor comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT deekssteveng comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT facenteshelley comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT keatingsheilam comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT buschmichaelp comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT murphygary comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT weltealex comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT quinnthomas comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT eshlemansusanh comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma AT laeyendeckeroliver comparisonofcrosssectionalhivincidenceassayresultsfromdriedbloodspotsandplasma |