Cargando…

Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of a standardized qualitative scoring system for treatment response assessment at 18F-FDG PET-CT in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma and correlate this with subsequent patient outcome. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scarsbrook, Andrew, Vaidyanathan, Sriram, Chowdhury, Fahmid, Swift, Sarah, Cooper, Rachel, Patel, Chirag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5323466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27738729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3537-8
_version_ 1782510027691524096
author Scarsbrook, Andrew
Vaidyanathan, Sriram
Chowdhury, Fahmid
Swift, Sarah
Cooper, Rachel
Patel, Chirag
author_facet Scarsbrook, Andrew
Vaidyanathan, Sriram
Chowdhury, Fahmid
Swift, Sarah
Cooper, Rachel
Patel, Chirag
author_sort Scarsbrook, Andrew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of a standardized qualitative scoring system for treatment response assessment at 18F-FDG PET-CT in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma and correlate this with subsequent patient outcome. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a single centre between 2011 and 2014 underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT approximately 3 months post-treatment. Tumour metabolic response was assessed qualitatively using a 5-point scale ranging from background level activity only through to progressive metabolic disease. Clinical and radiological (MRI pelvis) follow-up was performed in all patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method (Mantel-Cox log-rank) and correlated with qualitative score using Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Forty patients (41.7 %) demonstrated complete metabolic response (CMR) on post-treatment PET-CT (Score 1/2) with 38 patients (95.0 %) remaining disease free after a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Twenty-four patients (25.0 %) had indeterminate residual uptake (ID, Score 3) at primary or nodal sites after treatment, of these eight patients (33.3 %) relapsed on follow-up, including all patients with residual nodal uptake (n = 4Eleven11 of 17 patients (64.7 %) with significant residual uptake (partial metabolic response, PMR, Score 4) subsequently relapsed. In 15 patients (15.6 %) PET-CT demonstrated progressive disease (PD, Score 5) following treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a highly statistically significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with CMR, indeterminate uptake, PMR and PD (Log-rank, P < 0.0001). Chi-squared test demonstrated a highly statistically significant association between increasing qualitative score and risk of recurrence or death (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Use of a 5-point qualitative scoring system to assess metabolic response to CRT in locally advanced cervical carcinoma predicts survival outcome and this prognostic information may help guide further patient management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5323466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53234662017-03-09 Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy Scarsbrook, Andrew Vaidyanathan, Sriram Chowdhury, Fahmid Swift, Sarah Cooper, Rachel Patel, Chirag Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of a standardized qualitative scoring system for treatment response assessment at 18F-FDG PET-CT in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma and correlate this with subsequent patient outcome. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a single centre between 2011 and 2014 underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT approximately 3 months post-treatment. Tumour metabolic response was assessed qualitatively using a 5-point scale ranging from background level activity only through to progressive metabolic disease. Clinical and radiological (MRI pelvis) follow-up was performed in all patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method (Mantel-Cox log-rank) and correlated with qualitative score using Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Forty patients (41.7 %) demonstrated complete metabolic response (CMR) on post-treatment PET-CT (Score 1/2) with 38 patients (95.0 %) remaining disease free after a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Twenty-four patients (25.0 %) had indeterminate residual uptake (ID, Score 3) at primary or nodal sites after treatment, of these eight patients (33.3 %) relapsed on follow-up, including all patients with residual nodal uptake (n = 4Eleven11 of 17 patients (64.7 %) with significant residual uptake (partial metabolic response, PMR, Score 4) subsequently relapsed. In 15 patients (15.6 %) PET-CT demonstrated progressive disease (PD, Score 5) following treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a highly statistically significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with CMR, indeterminate uptake, PMR and PD (Log-rank, P < 0.0001). Chi-squared test demonstrated a highly statistically significant association between increasing qualitative score and risk of recurrence or death (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Use of a 5-point qualitative scoring system to assess metabolic response to CRT in locally advanced cervical carcinoma predicts survival outcome and this prognostic information may help guide further patient management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-10-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5323466/ /pubmed/27738729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3537-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Scarsbrook, Andrew
Vaidyanathan, Sriram
Chowdhury, Fahmid
Swift, Sarah
Cooper, Rachel
Patel, Chirag
Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
title Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
title_full Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
title_short Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
title_sort efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18f-fdg pet-ct for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5323466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27738729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3537-8
work_keys_str_mv AT scarsbrookandrew efficacyofqualitativeresponseassessmentinterpretationcriteriaat18ffdgpetctforpredictingoutcomeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithchemoradiotherapy
AT vaidyanathansriram efficacyofqualitativeresponseassessmentinterpretationcriteriaat18ffdgpetctforpredictingoutcomeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithchemoradiotherapy
AT chowdhuryfahmid efficacyofqualitativeresponseassessmentinterpretationcriteriaat18ffdgpetctforpredictingoutcomeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithchemoradiotherapy
AT swiftsarah efficacyofqualitativeresponseassessmentinterpretationcriteriaat18ffdgpetctforpredictingoutcomeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithchemoradiotherapy
AT cooperrachel efficacyofqualitativeresponseassessmentinterpretationcriteriaat18ffdgpetctforpredictingoutcomeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithchemoradiotherapy
AT patelchirag efficacyofqualitativeresponseassessmentinterpretationcriteriaat18ffdgpetctforpredictingoutcomeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithchemoradiotherapy