Cargando…

An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of red blood cell size, considered to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize previous studies on RDW and CVD outcomes through an overall and dose-response meta-analysis. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Haifeng, Sun, Tao, Li, Cheng, Li, Yuanmin, Guo, Zheng, Wang, Wei, Li, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43420
_version_ 1782510149329485824
author Hou, Haifeng
Sun, Tao
Li, Cheng
Li, Yuanmin
Guo, Zheng
Wang, Wei
Li, Dong
author_facet Hou, Haifeng
Sun, Tao
Li, Cheng
Li, Yuanmin
Guo, Zheng
Wang, Wei
Li, Dong
author_sort Hou, Haifeng
collection PubMed
description Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of red blood cell size, considered to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize previous studies on RDW and CVD outcomes through an overall and dose-response meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched systematically for English and Chinese language publications up to November 30, 2015. We extracted data from publications matching our inclusion criteria for calculating pooled hazard ratio (HR), which was used to assess prognostic impact of RDW on CVD. Twenty-seven articles, consisting of 28 studies and 102,689 participants (mean age 63.9 years, 63,703 males/36,846 females, 2,140 gender-unmentioned subjects) were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled HRs are 1.12 (95% CI = 1.09–1.15) for the association of all-cause mortality (ACM) per 1% increase of RDW, 1.12(95% CI = 1.08–1.17) for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) per 1% increase of RDW. A dose-response curve relating RDW increase to its effect on CVD outcomes was established (p(curve) < 0.001). For every 1-unit increase of RDW, there is an increased risk of occurrence of ACM (pooled HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.02–1.04) and MACEs (pooled HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.06). This study indicates RDW may be a prognostic indicator for CVD outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5324076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53240762017-03-01 An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes Hou, Haifeng Sun, Tao Li, Cheng Li, Yuanmin Guo, Zheng Wang, Wei Li, Dong Sci Rep Article Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of red blood cell size, considered to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize previous studies on RDW and CVD outcomes through an overall and dose-response meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched systematically for English and Chinese language publications up to November 30, 2015. We extracted data from publications matching our inclusion criteria for calculating pooled hazard ratio (HR), which was used to assess prognostic impact of RDW on CVD. Twenty-seven articles, consisting of 28 studies and 102,689 participants (mean age 63.9 years, 63,703 males/36,846 females, 2,140 gender-unmentioned subjects) were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled HRs are 1.12 (95% CI = 1.09–1.15) for the association of all-cause mortality (ACM) per 1% increase of RDW, 1.12(95% CI = 1.08–1.17) for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) per 1% increase of RDW. A dose-response curve relating RDW increase to its effect on CVD outcomes was established (p(curve) < 0.001). For every 1-unit increase of RDW, there is an increased risk of occurrence of ACM (pooled HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.02–1.04) and MACEs (pooled HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.06). This study indicates RDW may be a prognostic indicator for CVD outcomes. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5324076/ /pubmed/28233844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43420 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Hou, Haifeng
Sun, Tao
Li, Cheng
Li, Yuanmin
Guo, Zheng
Wang, Wei
Li, Dong
An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes
title An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes
title_full An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes
title_fullStr An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes
title_full_unstemmed An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes
title_short An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes
title_sort overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and cvd outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43420
work_keys_str_mv AT houhaifeng anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT suntao anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT licheng anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT liyuanmin anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT guozheng anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT wangwei anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT lidong anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT houhaifeng overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT suntao overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT licheng overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT liyuanmin overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT guozheng overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT wangwei overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes
AT lidong overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes