Cargando…
An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of red blood cell size, considered to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize previous studies on RDW and CVD outcomes through an overall and dose-response meta-analysis. P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43420 |
_version_ | 1782510149329485824 |
---|---|
author | Hou, Haifeng Sun, Tao Li, Cheng Li, Yuanmin Guo, Zheng Wang, Wei Li, Dong |
author_facet | Hou, Haifeng Sun, Tao Li, Cheng Li, Yuanmin Guo, Zheng Wang, Wei Li, Dong |
author_sort | Hou, Haifeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of red blood cell size, considered to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize previous studies on RDW and CVD outcomes through an overall and dose-response meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched systematically for English and Chinese language publications up to November 30, 2015. We extracted data from publications matching our inclusion criteria for calculating pooled hazard ratio (HR), which was used to assess prognostic impact of RDW on CVD. Twenty-seven articles, consisting of 28 studies and 102,689 participants (mean age 63.9 years, 63,703 males/36,846 females, 2,140 gender-unmentioned subjects) were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled HRs are 1.12 (95% CI = 1.09–1.15) for the association of all-cause mortality (ACM) per 1% increase of RDW, 1.12(95% CI = 1.08–1.17) for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) per 1% increase of RDW. A dose-response curve relating RDW increase to its effect on CVD outcomes was established (p(curve) < 0.001). For every 1-unit increase of RDW, there is an increased risk of occurrence of ACM (pooled HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.02–1.04) and MACEs (pooled HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.06). This study indicates RDW may be a prognostic indicator for CVD outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5324076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53240762017-03-01 An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes Hou, Haifeng Sun, Tao Li, Cheng Li, Yuanmin Guo, Zheng Wang, Wei Li, Dong Sci Rep Article Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of red blood cell size, considered to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize previous studies on RDW and CVD outcomes through an overall and dose-response meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched systematically for English and Chinese language publications up to November 30, 2015. We extracted data from publications matching our inclusion criteria for calculating pooled hazard ratio (HR), which was used to assess prognostic impact of RDW on CVD. Twenty-seven articles, consisting of 28 studies and 102,689 participants (mean age 63.9 years, 63,703 males/36,846 females, 2,140 gender-unmentioned subjects) were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled HRs are 1.12 (95% CI = 1.09–1.15) for the association of all-cause mortality (ACM) per 1% increase of RDW, 1.12(95% CI = 1.08–1.17) for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) per 1% increase of RDW. A dose-response curve relating RDW increase to its effect on CVD outcomes was established (p(curve) < 0.001). For every 1-unit increase of RDW, there is an increased risk of occurrence of ACM (pooled HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.02–1.04) and MACEs (pooled HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.06). This study indicates RDW may be a prognostic indicator for CVD outcomes. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5324076/ /pubmed/28233844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43420 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Hou, Haifeng Sun, Tao Li, Cheng Li, Yuanmin Guo, Zheng Wang, Wei Li, Dong An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes |
title | An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes |
title_full | An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes |
title_fullStr | An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes |
title_short | An overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and CVD outcomes |
title_sort | overall and dose-response meta-analysis of red blood cell distribution width and cvd outcomes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houhaifeng anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT suntao anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT licheng anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT liyuanmin anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT guozheng anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT wangwei anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT lidong anoverallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT houhaifeng overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT suntao overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT licheng overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT liyuanmin overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT guozheng overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT wangwei overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes AT lidong overallanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofredbloodcelldistributionwidthandcvdoutcomes |