Cargando…
How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
BACKGROUND: As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0 |
_version_ | 1782510181887770624 |
---|---|
author | Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara Albisser Schleger, Heidi Tanner, Sabine Schnurrer, Valentin Vogt, Deborah R. Reiter-Theil, Stella Pargger, Hans |
author_facet | Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara Albisser Schleger, Heidi Tanner, Sabine Schnurrer, Valentin Vogt, Deborah R. Reiter-Theil, Stella Pargger, Hans |
author_sort | Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model in daily routine? Up to now, there has been little examination of these factors in this field. METHODS: A medical ethics decision-making model called METAP was introduced on three intensive care units and two geriatric wards. An evaluation study was performed from 7 months after deployment of the project until two and a half years. Quantitative and qualitative methods including a questionnaire, semi-structured face-to-face and group-interviews were used. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants from different professional groups took part in 33 face-to-face and 9 group interviews, and 122 questionnaires could be analysed. The facilitating factors most frequently mentioned were: acceptance and presence of the model, support given by the medical and nursing management, an existing or developing (explicit) ethics culture, perception of a need for a medical ethics decision-making model, and engaged staff members. Lack of presence and acceptance, insufficient time resources and staff, poor inter-professional collaboration, absence of ethical competence, and not recognizing ethical problems were identified as inhibiting the implementation of the METAP model. However, the results of the questionnaire as well as of explicit inquiry showed that the respondents stated to have had enough time and staff available to use METAP if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators and barriers of the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model are quite similar to that of medical guidelines. The planning for implementing an ethics model or guideline can, therefore, benefit from the extensive literature and experience concerning the implementation of medical guidelines. Lack of time and staff can be overcome when people are convinced that the benefits justify the effort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5324224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53242242017-03-01 How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara Albisser Schleger, Heidi Tanner, Sabine Schnurrer, Valentin Vogt, Deborah R. Reiter-Theil, Stella Pargger, Hans BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model in daily routine? Up to now, there has been little examination of these factors in this field. METHODS: A medical ethics decision-making model called METAP was introduced on three intensive care units and two geriatric wards. An evaluation study was performed from 7 months after deployment of the project until two and a half years. Quantitative and qualitative methods including a questionnaire, semi-structured face-to-face and group-interviews were used. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants from different professional groups took part in 33 face-to-face and 9 group interviews, and 122 questionnaires could be analysed. The facilitating factors most frequently mentioned were: acceptance and presence of the model, support given by the medical and nursing management, an existing or developing (explicit) ethics culture, perception of a need for a medical ethics decision-making model, and engaged staff members. Lack of presence and acceptance, insufficient time resources and staff, poor inter-professional collaboration, absence of ethical competence, and not recognizing ethical problems were identified as inhibiting the implementation of the METAP model. However, the results of the questionnaire as well as of explicit inquiry showed that the respondents stated to have had enough time and staff available to use METAP if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators and barriers of the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model are quite similar to that of medical guidelines. The planning for implementing an ethics model or guideline can, therefore, benefit from the extensive literature and experience concerning the implementation of medical guidelines. Lack of time and staff can be overcome when people are convinced that the benefits justify the effort. BioMed Central 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5324224/ /pubmed/28231781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara Albisser Schleger, Heidi Tanner, Sabine Schnurrer, Valentin Vogt, Deborah R. Reiter-Theil, Stella Pargger, Hans How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model |
title | How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model |
title_full | How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model |
title_fullStr | How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model |
title_full_unstemmed | How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model |
title_short | How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model |
title_sort | how to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyerzehnderbarbara howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel AT albisserschlegerheidi howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel AT tannersabine howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel AT schnurrervalentin howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel AT vogtdeborahr howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel AT reitertheilstella howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel AT parggerhans howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel |