Cargando…

How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model

BACKGROUND: As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara, Albisser Schleger, Heidi, Tanner, Sabine, Schnurrer, Valentin, Vogt, Deborah R., Reiter-Theil, Stella, Pargger, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0
_version_ 1782510181887770624
author Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara
Albisser Schleger, Heidi
Tanner, Sabine
Schnurrer, Valentin
Vogt, Deborah R.
Reiter-Theil, Stella
Pargger, Hans
author_facet Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara
Albisser Schleger, Heidi
Tanner, Sabine
Schnurrer, Valentin
Vogt, Deborah R.
Reiter-Theil, Stella
Pargger, Hans
author_sort Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model in daily routine? Up to now, there has been little examination of these factors in this field. METHODS: A medical ethics decision-making model called METAP was introduced on three intensive care units and two geriatric wards. An evaluation study was performed from 7 months after deployment of the project until two and a half years. Quantitative and qualitative methods including a questionnaire, semi-structured face-to-face and group-interviews were used. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants from different professional groups took part in 33 face-to-face and 9 group interviews, and 122 questionnaires could be analysed. The facilitating factors most frequently mentioned were: acceptance and presence of the model, support given by the medical and nursing management, an existing or developing (explicit) ethics culture, perception of a need for a medical ethics decision-making model, and engaged staff members. Lack of presence and acceptance, insufficient time resources and staff, poor inter-professional collaboration, absence of ethical competence, and not recognizing ethical problems were identified as inhibiting the implementation of the METAP model. However, the results of the questionnaire as well as of explicit inquiry showed that the respondents stated to have had enough time and staff available to use METAP if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators and barriers of the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model are quite similar to that of medical guidelines. The planning for implementing an ethics model or guideline can, therefore, benefit from the extensive literature and experience concerning the implementation of medical guidelines. Lack of time and staff can be overcome when people are convinced that the benefits justify the effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5324224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53242242017-03-01 How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara Albisser Schleger, Heidi Tanner, Sabine Schnurrer, Valentin Vogt, Deborah R. Reiter-Theil, Stella Pargger, Hans BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model in daily routine? Up to now, there has been little examination of these factors in this field. METHODS: A medical ethics decision-making model called METAP was introduced on three intensive care units and two geriatric wards. An evaluation study was performed from 7 months after deployment of the project until two and a half years. Quantitative and qualitative methods including a questionnaire, semi-structured face-to-face and group-interviews were used. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants from different professional groups took part in 33 face-to-face and 9 group interviews, and 122 questionnaires could be analysed. The facilitating factors most frequently mentioned were: acceptance and presence of the model, support given by the medical and nursing management, an existing or developing (explicit) ethics culture, perception of a need for a medical ethics decision-making model, and engaged staff members. Lack of presence and acceptance, insufficient time resources and staff, poor inter-professional collaboration, absence of ethical competence, and not recognizing ethical problems were identified as inhibiting the implementation of the METAP model. However, the results of the questionnaire as well as of explicit inquiry showed that the respondents stated to have had enough time and staff available to use METAP if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators and barriers of the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model are quite similar to that of medical guidelines. The planning for implementing an ethics model or guideline can, therefore, benefit from the extensive literature and experience concerning the implementation of medical guidelines. Lack of time and staff can be overcome when people are convinced that the benefits justify the effort. BioMed Central 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5324224/ /pubmed/28231781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara
Albisser Schleger, Heidi
Tanner, Sabine
Schnurrer, Valentin
Vogt, Deborah R.
Reiter-Theil, Stella
Pargger, Hans
How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
title How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
title_full How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
title_fullStr How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
title_full_unstemmed How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
title_short How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
title_sort how to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerzehnderbarbara howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel
AT albisserschlegerheidi howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel
AT tannersabine howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel
AT schnurrervalentin howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel
AT vogtdeborahr howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel
AT reitertheilstella howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel
AT parggerhans howtointroducemedicalethicsatthebedsidefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofanethicaldecisionmakingmodel