Cargando…

Imaging Subclinical Atherosclerosis: Where Do We Stand?

The age of initiation and the rate of progression of atherosclerosis vary markedly among individuals and have been difficult to predict with traditional cardiovascular risk assessment models. Although these risk models provide good discrimination and calibration in certain populations, cardiovascula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papageorgiou, Nikolaos, Briasoulis, Alexandros, Androulakis, Emmanuel, Tousoulis, Dimitris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27492229
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X12666160803095855
Descripción
Sumario:The age of initiation and the rate of progression of atherosclerosis vary markedly among individuals and have been difficult to predict with traditional cardiovascular risk assessment models. Although these risk models provide good discrimination and calibration in certain populations, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk may not be accurately estimated in low- and intermediate risk individuals. Therefore, imaging techniques such as Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI), Coronary Artery Calcium score (CAC), carotid Intima-Media Thickness (cIMT), flow mediated dilation (FMD) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) have been developed and used to reclassify these individuals. In the present article we review the role of the most commonly used imaging techniques for CVD risk assessment.