Cargando…
Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the incidence of burnout among radiation oncology trainees in Australia and New Zealand and the stress and satisfaction factors related to burnout. METHODS: A survey of trainees was conducted in mid‐2015. There were 42 Likert scale questions on stress, 14 Likert scale quest...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12541 |
_version_ | 1782510232536088576 |
---|---|
author | Leung, John Rioseco, Pilar |
author_facet | Leung, John Rioseco, Pilar |
author_sort | Leung, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the incidence of burnout among radiation oncology trainees in Australia and New Zealand and the stress and satisfaction factors related to burnout. METHODS: A survey of trainees was conducted in mid‐2015. There were 42 Likert scale questions on stress, 14 Likert scale questions on satisfaction and the Maslach Burnout Inventory‐Human Services Survey assessed burnout. A principal component analysis identified specific stress and satisfaction areas. Categorical variables for the stress and satisfaction factors were computed. Associations between respondent's characteristics and stress and satisfaction subscales were examined by independent sample t‐tests and analysis of variance. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohens's d when significant mean differences were observed. This was also done for respondent characteristics and the three burnout subscales. Multiple regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The response rate was 81.5%. The principal component analysis for stress identified five areas: demands on time, professional development/training, delivery demands, interpersonal demands and administration/organizational issues. There were no significant differences by demographic group or area of interest after P‐values were adjusted for the multiple tests conducted. The principal component analysis revealed two satisfaction areas: resources/professional activities and value/delivery of services. There were no significant differences by demographic characteristics or area of interest in the level of satisfaction after P‐values were adjusted for the multiple tests conducted. The burnout results revealed 49.5% of respondents scored highly in emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization and 13.1% had burnout in all three measures. Multiple regression analysis revealed the stress subscales ‘demands on time’ and ‘interpersonal demands’ were associated with emotional exhaustion. ‘Interpersonal demands’ was also associated with depersonalization and correlated negatively with personal accomplishment. The satisfaction of value/delivery of services subscale was associated with higher levels of personal accomplishment. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant level of burnout among radiation oncology trainees in Australia and New Zealand. Further work addressing intervention would be appropriate to reduce levels of burnout. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5324591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53245912017-03-08 Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees Leung, John Rioseco, Pilar J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol RADIATION ONCOLOGY INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the incidence of burnout among radiation oncology trainees in Australia and New Zealand and the stress and satisfaction factors related to burnout. METHODS: A survey of trainees was conducted in mid‐2015. There were 42 Likert scale questions on stress, 14 Likert scale questions on satisfaction and the Maslach Burnout Inventory‐Human Services Survey assessed burnout. A principal component analysis identified specific stress and satisfaction areas. Categorical variables for the stress and satisfaction factors were computed. Associations between respondent's characteristics and stress and satisfaction subscales were examined by independent sample t‐tests and analysis of variance. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohens's d when significant mean differences were observed. This was also done for respondent characteristics and the three burnout subscales. Multiple regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The response rate was 81.5%. The principal component analysis for stress identified five areas: demands on time, professional development/training, delivery demands, interpersonal demands and administration/organizational issues. There were no significant differences by demographic group or area of interest after P‐values were adjusted for the multiple tests conducted. The principal component analysis revealed two satisfaction areas: resources/professional activities and value/delivery of services. There were no significant differences by demographic characteristics or area of interest in the level of satisfaction after P‐values were adjusted for the multiple tests conducted. The burnout results revealed 49.5% of respondents scored highly in emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization and 13.1% had burnout in all three measures. Multiple regression analysis revealed the stress subscales ‘demands on time’ and ‘interpersonal demands’ were associated with emotional exhaustion. ‘Interpersonal demands’ was also associated with depersonalization and correlated negatively with personal accomplishment. The satisfaction of value/delivery of services subscale was associated with higher levels of personal accomplishment. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant level of burnout among radiation oncology trainees in Australia and New Zealand. Further work addressing intervention would be appropriate to reduce levels of burnout. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-31 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5324591/ /pubmed/27797163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12541 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | RADIATION ONCOLOGY Leung, John Rioseco, Pilar Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees |
title | Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees |
title_full | Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees |
title_fullStr | Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees |
title_full_unstemmed | Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees |
title_short | Burnout, stress and satisfaction among Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees |
title_sort | burnout, stress and satisfaction among australian and new zealand radiation oncology trainees |
topic | RADIATION ONCOLOGY |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leungjohn burnoutstressandsatisfactionamongaustralianandnewzealandradiationoncologytrainees AT riosecopilar burnoutstressandsatisfactionamongaustralianandnewzealandradiationoncologytrainees |