Cargando…

Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

OBJECTIVE: As uptake of cervical screening continues to decline, this systematic review synthesises the qualitative literature on women's perceptions and experiences of cervical screening in the context of an organised call–recall programme, in order to understand the barriers to informed uptak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chorley, Amanda J., Marlow, Laura A. V., Forster, Alice S., Haddrell, Jessica B., Waller, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4126
_version_ 1782510241171111936
author Chorley, Amanda J.
Marlow, Laura A. V.
Forster, Alice S.
Haddrell, Jessica B.
Waller, Jo
author_facet Chorley, Amanda J.
Marlow, Laura A. V.
Forster, Alice S.
Haddrell, Jessica B.
Waller, Jo
author_sort Chorley, Amanda J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: As uptake of cervical screening continues to decline, this systematic review synthesises the qualitative literature on women's perceptions and experiences of cervical screening in the context of an organised call–recall programme, in order to understand the barriers to informed uptake. METHODS: We searched nine databases for English language peer‐reviewed publications reporting on qualitative data from screening‐eligible women, exploring barriers to cervical screening in countries that offer a nationally organised call–recall programme. Evidence was integrated using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty‐nine papers from the UK, Australia, Sweden and Korea were included. The majority of participants had attended screening at least once. Two broad themes were identified: (a) should I go for screening? and (b) screening is a big deal. In considering whether to attend, women discussed the personal relevance and value of screening. Women who had previously attended described how it was a big deal, physically and emotionally, and the varied threats that screening presents. Practical barriers affected whether women translated screening intentions into action. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in women's understanding and perceptions of cervical screening suggests that interventions tailored to decisional stage may be of value in increasing engagement with the invitation and uptake of screening in those who wish to take part. There is also a need for further research with women who have never attended screening, especially those who remain unaware or unengaged, as their perspectives are lacking in the existing literature. © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5324630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53246302017-03-08 Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis Chorley, Amanda J. Marlow, Laura A. V. Forster, Alice S. Haddrell, Jessica B. Waller, Jo Psychooncology Reviews OBJECTIVE: As uptake of cervical screening continues to decline, this systematic review synthesises the qualitative literature on women's perceptions and experiences of cervical screening in the context of an organised call–recall programme, in order to understand the barriers to informed uptake. METHODS: We searched nine databases for English language peer‐reviewed publications reporting on qualitative data from screening‐eligible women, exploring barriers to cervical screening in countries that offer a nationally organised call–recall programme. Evidence was integrated using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty‐nine papers from the UK, Australia, Sweden and Korea were included. The majority of participants had attended screening at least once. Two broad themes were identified: (a) should I go for screening? and (b) screening is a big deal. In considering whether to attend, women discussed the personal relevance and value of screening. Women who had previously attended described how it was a big deal, physically and emotionally, and the varied threats that screening presents. Practical barriers affected whether women translated screening intentions into action. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in women's understanding and perceptions of cervical screening suggests that interventions tailored to decisional stage may be of value in increasing engagement with the invitation and uptake of screening in those who wish to take part. There is also a need for further research with women who have never attended screening, especially those who remain unaware or unengaged, as their perspectives are lacking in the existing literature. © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-12 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5324630/ /pubmed/27072589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4126 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Chorley, Amanda J.
Marlow, Laura A. V.
Forster, Alice S.
Haddrell, Jessica B.
Waller, Jo
Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
title Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_full Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_fullStr Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_short Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_sort experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4126
work_keys_str_mv AT chorleyamandaj experiencesofcervicalscreeningandbarrierstoparticipationinthecontextofanorganisedprogrammeasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT marlowlauraav experiencesofcervicalscreeningandbarrierstoparticipationinthecontextofanorganisedprogrammeasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT forsteralices experiencesofcervicalscreeningandbarrierstoparticipationinthecontextofanorganisedprogrammeasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT haddrelljessicab experiencesofcervicalscreeningandbarrierstoparticipationinthecontextofanorganisedprogrammeasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT wallerjo experiencesofcervicalscreeningandbarrierstoparticipationinthecontextofanorganisedprogrammeasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis