Cargando…
A pupil size response model to assess fear learning
During fear conditioning, pupil size responses dissociate between conditioned stimuli that are contingently paired (CS+) with an aversive unconditioned stimulus, and those that are unpaired (CS‐). Current approaches to assess fear learning from pupil responses rely on ad hoc specifications. Here, we...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27925650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12801 |
_version_ | 1782510252932988928 |
---|---|
author | Korn, Christoph W. Staib, Matthias Tzovara, Athina Castegnetti, Giuseppe Bach, Dominik R. |
author_facet | Korn, Christoph W. Staib, Matthias Tzovara, Athina Castegnetti, Giuseppe Bach, Dominik R. |
author_sort | Korn, Christoph W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | During fear conditioning, pupil size responses dissociate between conditioned stimuli that are contingently paired (CS+) with an aversive unconditioned stimulus, and those that are unpaired (CS‐). Current approaches to assess fear learning from pupil responses rely on ad hoc specifications. Here, we sought to develop a psychophysiological model (PsPM) in which pupil responses are characterized by response functions within the framework of a linear time‐invariant system. This PsPM can be written as a general linear model, which is inverted to yield amplitude estimates of the eliciting process in the central nervous system. We first characterized fear‐conditioned pupil size responses based on an experiment with auditory CS. PsPM‐based parameter estimates distinguished CS+/CS‐ better than, or on par with, two commonly used methods (peak scoring, area under the curve). We validated this PsPM in four independent experiments with auditory, visual, and somatosensory CS, as well as short (3.5 s) and medium (6 s) CS/US intervals. Overall, the new PsPM provided equal or decisively better differentiation of CS+/CS‐ than the two alternative methods and was never decisively worse. We further compared pupil responses with concurrently measured skin conductance and heart period responses. Finally, we used our previously developed luminance‐related pupil responses to infer the timing of the likely neural input into the pupillary system. Overall, we establish a new PsPM to assess fear conditioning based on pupil responses. The model has a potential to provide higher statistical sensitivity, can be applied to other conditioning paradigms in humans, and may be easily extended to nonhuman mammals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5324687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53246872017-03-14 A pupil size response model to assess fear learning Korn, Christoph W. Staib, Matthias Tzovara, Athina Castegnetti, Giuseppe Bach, Dominik R. Psychophysiology Original Articles During fear conditioning, pupil size responses dissociate between conditioned stimuli that are contingently paired (CS+) with an aversive unconditioned stimulus, and those that are unpaired (CS‐). Current approaches to assess fear learning from pupil responses rely on ad hoc specifications. Here, we sought to develop a psychophysiological model (PsPM) in which pupil responses are characterized by response functions within the framework of a linear time‐invariant system. This PsPM can be written as a general linear model, which is inverted to yield amplitude estimates of the eliciting process in the central nervous system. We first characterized fear‐conditioned pupil size responses based on an experiment with auditory CS. PsPM‐based parameter estimates distinguished CS+/CS‐ better than, or on par with, two commonly used methods (peak scoring, area under the curve). We validated this PsPM in four independent experiments with auditory, visual, and somatosensory CS, as well as short (3.5 s) and medium (6 s) CS/US intervals. Overall, the new PsPM provided equal or decisively better differentiation of CS+/CS‐ than the two alternative methods and was never decisively worse. We further compared pupil responses with concurrently measured skin conductance and heart period responses. Finally, we used our previously developed luminance‐related pupil responses to infer the timing of the likely neural input into the pupillary system. Overall, we establish a new PsPM to assess fear conditioning based on pupil responses. The model has a potential to provide higher statistical sensitivity, can be applied to other conditioning paradigms in humans, and may be easily extended to nonhuman mammals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-07 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5324687/ /pubmed/27925650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12801 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Korn, Christoph W. Staib, Matthias Tzovara, Athina Castegnetti, Giuseppe Bach, Dominik R. A pupil size response model to assess fear learning |
title | A pupil size response model to assess fear learning |
title_full | A pupil size response model to assess fear learning |
title_fullStr | A pupil size response model to assess fear learning |
title_full_unstemmed | A pupil size response model to assess fear learning |
title_short | A pupil size response model to assess fear learning |
title_sort | pupil size response model to assess fear learning |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27925650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kornchristophw apupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT staibmatthias apupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT tzovaraathina apupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT castegnettigiuseppe apupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT bachdominikr apupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT kornchristophw pupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT staibmatthias pupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT tzovaraathina pupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT castegnettigiuseppe pupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning AT bachdominikr pupilsizeresponsemodeltoassessfearlearning |