Cargando…

Epistemic Injustice and Illness

This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kidd, Ian James, Carel, Havi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172
_version_ 1782510255688646656
author Kidd, Ian James
Carel, Havi
author_facet Kidd, Ian James
Carel, Havi
author_sort Kidd, Ian James
collection PubMed
description This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5324700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53247002017-03-14 Epistemic Injustice and Illness Kidd, Ian James Carel, Havi J Appl Philos Original Articles This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-08 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5324700/ /pubmed/28303075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Philosophy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Philosophy. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kidd, Ian James
Carel, Havi
Epistemic Injustice and Illness
title Epistemic Injustice and Illness
title_full Epistemic Injustice and Illness
title_fullStr Epistemic Injustice and Illness
title_full_unstemmed Epistemic Injustice and Illness
title_short Epistemic Injustice and Illness
title_sort epistemic injustice and illness
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172
work_keys_str_mv AT kiddianjames epistemicinjusticeandillness
AT carelhavi epistemicinjusticeandillness