Cargando…
Epistemic Injustice and Illness
This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analy...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172 |
_version_ | 1782510255688646656 |
---|---|
author | Kidd, Ian James Carel, Havi |
author_facet | Kidd, Ian James Carel, Havi |
author_sort | Kidd, Ian James |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5324700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53247002017-03-14 Epistemic Injustice and Illness Kidd, Ian James Carel, Havi J Appl Philos Original Articles This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-08 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5324700/ /pubmed/28303075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Philosophy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Philosophy. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kidd, Ian James Carel, Havi Epistemic Injustice and Illness |
title | Epistemic Injustice and Illness |
title_full | Epistemic Injustice and Illness |
title_fullStr | Epistemic Injustice and Illness |
title_full_unstemmed | Epistemic Injustice and Illness |
title_short | Epistemic Injustice and Illness |
title_sort | epistemic injustice and illness |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiddianjames epistemicinjusticeandillness AT carelhavi epistemicinjusticeandillness |