Cargando…

Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens

The intestinal microbiota is involved in a wide range of biological processes that benefit the host, including providing nutrition and modulating the immune system. Fine flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) is a flatfish of commercial interest that is native to the Chilean coast. The high value of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramírez, Carolina, Romero, Jaime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00271
_version_ 1782510257503731712
author Ramírez, Carolina
Romero, Jaime
author_facet Ramírez, Carolina
Romero, Jaime
author_sort Ramírez, Carolina
collection PubMed
description The intestinal microbiota is involved in a wide range of biological processes that benefit the host, including providing nutrition and modulating the immune system. Fine flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) is a flatfish of commercial interest that is native to the Chilean coast. The high value of this flatfish has prompted the development of stock enhancement and aquaculture activities. Knowledge of microbiota may help to improve the cultivation of this species; however, few comparative studies have evaluated the intestinal microbiota composition in farmed versus wild fishes. Intestinal contents from wild and aquaculture fish were collected, and DNA was extracted. Subsequently, the V3-region of 16S rRNA was PCR amplified and sequenced using the Ion Torrent platform. The comparison between wild and aquaculture specimens revealed important differences in the composition of the microbiota. The most abundant phylum in wild flounder was Proteobacteria, with an average relative abundance of 68.1 ± 15.4%; in contrast, in aquaculture flounder, this phylum had an average relative abundance of 30.8 ± 24.1%. Reciprocally, the most abundant phylum in flounder aquaculture was Firmicutes, averaging 61.2 ± 28.4%; in contrast, this phylum showed low abundance in wild flounder, in which it averaged 4.7 ± 4%. The phylum Actinobacteria showed greater abundance in wild flounder, ranging from 21.7 ± 18.8%, whereas, it averaged only 2.7 ± 3.8% in aquaculture fish. Specific taxa that were differentially distributed between wild and aquaculture flounder were identified using a statistical approach. At the genus level, a total of four genera were differentially represented between the two conditions. Bacillus and Pseudomonas were more highly represented in aquaculture flounder, whereas Arthrobacter and Psychrobacter were observed in wild flounder. Furthermore, in both cases, predicted functions (metabolic pathways) indicated that those microbiota might provide beneficial effects for the host, but wild flounder showed more noteworthy pathways (EPA/DHA, SCFA, biotin). Our results highlight the differences in the microbiota composition between wild and reared fish. Knowing the composition of the intestinal microbiota of P. adspersus is the first step toward exploring the proper management of this species, as well as toward the development of probiotics and functional foods based on their requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5324718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53247182017-03-10 Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens Ramírez, Carolina Romero, Jaime Front Microbiol Microbiology The intestinal microbiota is involved in a wide range of biological processes that benefit the host, including providing nutrition and modulating the immune system. Fine flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) is a flatfish of commercial interest that is native to the Chilean coast. The high value of this flatfish has prompted the development of stock enhancement and aquaculture activities. Knowledge of microbiota may help to improve the cultivation of this species; however, few comparative studies have evaluated the intestinal microbiota composition in farmed versus wild fishes. Intestinal contents from wild and aquaculture fish were collected, and DNA was extracted. Subsequently, the V3-region of 16S rRNA was PCR amplified and sequenced using the Ion Torrent platform. The comparison between wild and aquaculture specimens revealed important differences in the composition of the microbiota. The most abundant phylum in wild flounder was Proteobacteria, with an average relative abundance of 68.1 ± 15.4%; in contrast, in aquaculture flounder, this phylum had an average relative abundance of 30.8 ± 24.1%. Reciprocally, the most abundant phylum in flounder aquaculture was Firmicutes, averaging 61.2 ± 28.4%; in contrast, this phylum showed low abundance in wild flounder, in which it averaged 4.7 ± 4%. The phylum Actinobacteria showed greater abundance in wild flounder, ranging from 21.7 ± 18.8%, whereas, it averaged only 2.7 ± 3.8% in aquaculture fish. Specific taxa that were differentially distributed between wild and aquaculture flounder were identified using a statistical approach. At the genus level, a total of four genera were differentially represented between the two conditions. Bacillus and Pseudomonas were more highly represented in aquaculture flounder, whereas Arthrobacter and Psychrobacter were observed in wild flounder. Furthermore, in both cases, predicted functions (metabolic pathways) indicated that those microbiota might provide beneficial effects for the host, but wild flounder showed more noteworthy pathways (EPA/DHA, SCFA, biotin). Our results highlight the differences in the microbiota composition between wild and reared fish. Knowing the composition of the intestinal microbiota of P. adspersus is the first step toward exploring the proper management of this species, as well as toward the development of probiotics and functional foods based on their requirements. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5324718/ /pubmed/28286497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00271 Text en Copyright © 2017 Ramírez and Romero. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Ramírez, Carolina
Romero, Jaime
Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens
title Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens
title_full Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens
title_fullStr Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens
title_full_unstemmed Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens
title_short Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens
title_sort fine flounder (paralichthys adspersus) microbiome showed important differences between wild and reared specimens
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00271
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezcarolina fineflounderparalichthysadspersusmicrobiomeshowedimportantdifferencesbetweenwildandrearedspecimens
AT romerojaime fineflounderparalichthysadspersusmicrobiomeshowedimportantdifferencesbetweenwildandrearedspecimens