Cargando…

Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE: Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), defined as diastolic to systolic pressure-time integral ratio, is a useful tool reflecting the balance between coronary perfusion and arterial load. Suboptimal SEVR creating a supply–demand imbalance may limit favorable cardiac response to cardiac re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aslanger, Emre, Assous, Benjamin, Bihry, Nicolas, Beauvais, Florence, Logeart, Damien, Cohen-Solal, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443478
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7009
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), defined as diastolic to systolic pressure-time integral ratio, is a useful tool reflecting the balance between coronary perfusion and arterial load. Suboptimal SEVR creating a supply–demand imbalance may limit favorable cardiac response to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). To explore this hypothesis, we designed a study to analyze the relationship between baseline SEVR and response to CR in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: In this prospectively study, after baseline arterial tonometry, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs), patients undergone 20 sessions of CR. Post-CR echocardiographic and CPET measurements were obtained for comparison. RESULTS: Final study population was comprised of fifty subjects. Study population was divided into two subgroups by median SEVR value (1.45, interquartile range 0.38). Although both groups showed significant improvements in peak VO(2), significant improvements in oxygen pulse (πO(2)) (from 16.1±3.4 to 19.1±4.8 mL O(2).kg(–1).beat(–1); p<0.001) and stroke volume index (from 31±5 to 35±6 mL; p=0.008) were observed in only the patients in the above-median subgroup. The change in πO(2) was also significantly higher in the above-median SEVR subgroup (2.9±3.3 vs. 0.5±2.4; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that baseline supply–demand imbalance may limit systolic improvement response to CR in patients with CAD.