Cargando…

Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE: Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), defined as diastolic to systolic pressure-time integral ratio, is a useful tool reflecting the balance between coronary perfusion and arterial load. Suboptimal SEVR creating a supply–demand imbalance may limit favorable cardiac response to cardiac re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aslanger, Emre, Assous, Benjamin, Bihry, Nicolas, Beauvais, Florence, Logeart, Damien, Cohen-Solal, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443478
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7009
_version_ 1782510274393145344
author Aslanger, Emre
Assous, Benjamin
Bihry, Nicolas
Beauvais, Florence
Logeart, Damien
Cohen-Solal, Alain
author_facet Aslanger, Emre
Assous, Benjamin
Bihry, Nicolas
Beauvais, Florence
Logeart, Damien
Cohen-Solal, Alain
author_sort Aslanger, Emre
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), defined as diastolic to systolic pressure-time integral ratio, is a useful tool reflecting the balance between coronary perfusion and arterial load. Suboptimal SEVR creating a supply–demand imbalance may limit favorable cardiac response to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). To explore this hypothesis, we designed a study to analyze the relationship between baseline SEVR and response to CR in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: In this prospectively study, after baseline arterial tonometry, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs), patients undergone 20 sessions of CR. Post-CR echocardiographic and CPET measurements were obtained for comparison. RESULTS: Final study population was comprised of fifty subjects. Study population was divided into two subgroups by median SEVR value (1.45, interquartile range 0.38). Although both groups showed significant improvements in peak VO(2), significant improvements in oxygen pulse (πO(2)) (from 16.1±3.4 to 19.1±4.8 mL O(2).kg(–1).beat(–1); p<0.001) and stroke volume index (from 31±5 to 35±6 mL; p=0.008) were observed in only the patients in the above-median subgroup. The change in πO(2) was also significantly higher in the above-median SEVR subgroup (2.9±3.3 vs. 0.5±2.4; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that baseline supply–demand imbalance may limit systolic improvement response to CR in patients with CAD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5324860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53248602017-06-28 Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation Aslanger, Emre Assous, Benjamin Bihry, Nicolas Beauvais, Florence Logeart, Damien Cohen-Solal, Alain Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), defined as diastolic to systolic pressure-time integral ratio, is a useful tool reflecting the balance between coronary perfusion and arterial load. Suboptimal SEVR creating a supply–demand imbalance may limit favorable cardiac response to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). To explore this hypothesis, we designed a study to analyze the relationship between baseline SEVR and response to CR in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: In this prospectively study, after baseline arterial tonometry, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs), patients undergone 20 sessions of CR. Post-CR echocardiographic and CPET measurements were obtained for comparison. RESULTS: Final study population was comprised of fifty subjects. Study population was divided into two subgroups by median SEVR value (1.45, interquartile range 0.38). Although both groups showed significant improvements in peak VO(2), significant improvements in oxygen pulse (πO(2)) (from 16.1±3.4 to 19.1±4.8 mL O(2).kg(–1).beat(–1); p<0.001) and stroke volume index (from 31±5 to 35±6 mL; p=0.008) were observed in only the patients in the above-median subgroup. The change in πO(2) was also significantly higher in the above-median SEVR subgroup (2.9±3.3 vs. 0.5±2.4; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that baseline supply–demand imbalance may limit systolic improvement response to CR in patients with CAD. Kare Publishing 2017-01 2016-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5324860/ /pubmed/27443478 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7009 Text en Copyright © 2017 Turkish Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Aslanger, Emre
Assous, Benjamin
Bihry, Nicolas
Beauvais, Florence
Logeart, Damien
Cohen-Solal, Alain
Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation
title Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation
title_full Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation
title_fullStr Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation
title_short Baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation
title_sort baseline subendocardial viability ratio influences left ventricular systolic improvement with cardiac rehabilitation
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5324860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443478
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7009
work_keys_str_mv AT aslangeremre baselinesubendocardialviabilityratioinfluencesleftventricularsystolicimprovementwithcardiacrehabilitation
AT assousbenjamin baselinesubendocardialviabilityratioinfluencesleftventricularsystolicimprovementwithcardiacrehabilitation
AT bihrynicolas baselinesubendocardialviabilityratioinfluencesleftventricularsystolicimprovementwithcardiacrehabilitation
AT beauvaisflorence baselinesubendocardialviabilityratioinfluencesleftventricularsystolicimprovementwithcardiacrehabilitation
AT logeartdamien baselinesubendocardialviabilityratioinfluencesleftventricularsystolicimprovementwithcardiacrehabilitation
AT cohensolalalain baselinesubendocardialviabilityratioinfluencesleftventricularsystolicimprovementwithcardiacrehabilitation