Cargando…
Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification
Along with the global climate change, there is an increasing interest for its effect on phenological patterns such as start and end of the growing season. Scientific digital webcams are used for this purpose taking every day one or more images from the same natural motive showing for example trees o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28235092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171918 |
_version_ | 1782510336815923200 |
---|---|
author | Bothmann, Ludwig Menzel, Annette Menze, Bjoern H. Schunk, Christian Kauermann, Göran |
author_facet | Bothmann, Ludwig Menzel, Annette Menze, Bjoern H. Schunk, Christian Kauermann, Göran |
author_sort | Bothmann, Ludwig |
collection | PubMed |
description | Along with the global climate change, there is an increasing interest for its effect on phenological patterns such as start and end of the growing season. Scientific digital webcams are used for this purpose taking every day one or more images from the same natural motive showing for example trees or grassland sites. To derive phenological patterns from the webcam images, regions of interest are manually defined on these images by an expert and subsequently a time series of percentage greenness is derived and analyzed with respect to structural changes. While this standard approach leads to satisfying results and allows to determine dates of phenological change points, it is associated with a considerable amount of manual work and is therefore constrained to a limited number of webcams only. In particular, this forbids to apply the phenological analysis to a large network of publicly accessible webcams in order to capture spatial phenological variation. In order to be able to scale up the analysis to several hundreds or thousands of webcams, we propose and evaluate two automated alternatives for the definition of regions of interest, allowing for efficient analyses of webcam images. A semi-supervised approach selects pixels based on the correlation of the pixels’ time series of percentage greenness with a few prototype pixels. An unsupervised approach clusters pixels based on scores of a singular value decomposition. We show for a scientific webcam that the resulting regions of interest are at least as informative as those chosen by an expert with the advantage that no manual action is required. Additionally, we show that the methods can even be applied to publicly available webcams accessed via the internet yielding interesting partitions of the analyzed images. Finally, we show that the methods are suitable for the intended big data applications by analyzing 13988 webcams from the AMOS database. All developed methods are implemented in the statistical software package R and publicly available in the R package phenofun. Executable example code is provided as supplementary material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5325214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53252142017-03-09 Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification Bothmann, Ludwig Menzel, Annette Menze, Bjoern H. Schunk, Christian Kauermann, Göran PLoS One Research Article Along with the global climate change, there is an increasing interest for its effect on phenological patterns such as start and end of the growing season. Scientific digital webcams are used for this purpose taking every day one or more images from the same natural motive showing for example trees or grassland sites. To derive phenological patterns from the webcam images, regions of interest are manually defined on these images by an expert and subsequently a time series of percentage greenness is derived and analyzed with respect to structural changes. While this standard approach leads to satisfying results and allows to determine dates of phenological change points, it is associated with a considerable amount of manual work and is therefore constrained to a limited number of webcams only. In particular, this forbids to apply the phenological analysis to a large network of publicly accessible webcams in order to capture spatial phenological variation. In order to be able to scale up the analysis to several hundreds or thousands of webcams, we propose and evaluate two automated alternatives for the definition of regions of interest, allowing for efficient analyses of webcam images. A semi-supervised approach selects pixels based on the correlation of the pixels’ time series of percentage greenness with a few prototype pixels. An unsupervised approach clusters pixels based on scores of a singular value decomposition. We show for a scientific webcam that the resulting regions of interest are at least as informative as those chosen by an expert with the advantage that no manual action is required. Additionally, we show that the methods can even be applied to publicly available webcams accessed via the internet yielding interesting partitions of the analyzed images. Finally, we show that the methods are suitable for the intended big data applications by analyzing 13988 webcams from the AMOS database. All developed methods are implemented in the statistical software package R and publicly available in the R package phenofun. Executable example code is provided as supplementary material. Public Library of Science 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5325214/ /pubmed/28235092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171918 Text en © 2017 Bothmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bothmann, Ludwig Menzel, Annette Menze, Bjoern H. Schunk, Christian Kauermann, Göran Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification |
title | Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification |
title_full | Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification |
title_fullStr | Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification |
title_short | Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification |
title_sort | automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28235092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bothmannludwig automatedprocessingofwebcamimagesforphenologicalclassification AT menzelannette automatedprocessingofwebcamimagesforphenologicalclassification AT menzebjoernh automatedprocessingofwebcamimagesforphenologicalclassification AT schunkchristian automatedprocessingofwebcamimagesforphenologicalclassification AT kauermanngoran automatedprocessingofwebcamimagesforphenologicalclassification |