Cargando…

Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects

This paper presents the results of a consensus-driven process identifying 50 priority research questions for historical ecology obtained through crowdsourcing, literature reviews, and in-person workshopping. A deliberative approach was designed to maximize discussion and debate with defined outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda, Shoemaker, Anna C., McKechnie, Iain, Ekblom, Anneli, Szabó, Péter, Lane, Paul J., McAlvay, Alex C., Boles, Oliver J., Walshaw, Sarah, Petek, Nik, Gibbons, Kevin S., Quintana Morales, Erendira, Anderson, Eugene N., Ibragimow, Aleksandra, Podruczny, Grzegorz, Vamosi, Jana C., Marks-Block, Tony, LeCompte, Joyce K., Awâsis, Sākihitowin, Nabess, Carly, Sinclair, Paul, Crumley, Carole L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28235093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171883
_version_ 1782510339341942784
author Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda
Shoemaker, Anna C.
McKechnie, Iain
Ekblom, Anneli
Szabó, Péter
Lane, Paul J.
McAlvay, Alex C.
Boles, Oliver J.
Walshaw, Sarah
Petek, Nik
Gibbons, Kevin S.
Quintana Morales, Erendira
Anderson, Eugene N.
Ibragimow, Aleksandra
Podruczny, Grzegorz
Vamosi, Jana C.
Marks-Block, Tony
LeCompte, Joyce K.
Awâsis, Sākihitowin
Nabess, Carly
Sinclair, Paul
Crumley, Carole L.
author_facet Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda
Shoemaker, Anna C.
McKechnie, Iain
Ekblom, Anneli
Szabó, Péter
Lane, Paul J.
McAlvay, Alex C.
Boles, Oliver J.
Walshaw, Sarah
Petek, Nik
Gibbons, Kevin S.
Quintana Morales, Erendira
Anderson, Eugene N.
Ibragimow, Aleksandra
Podruczny, Grzegorz
Vamosi, Jana C.
Marks-Block, Tony
LeCompte, Joyce K.
Awâsis, Sākihitowin
Nabess, Carly
Sinclair, Paul
Crumley, Carole L.
author_sort Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda
collection PubMed
description This paper presents the results of a consensus-driven process identifying 50 priority research questions for historical ecology obtained through crowdsourcing, literature reviews, and in-person workshopping. A deliberative approach was designed to maximize discussion and debate with defined outcomes. Two in-person workshops (in Sweden and Canada) over the course of two years and online discussions were peer facilitated to define specific key questions for historical ecology from anthropological and archaeological perspectives. The aim of this research is to showcase the variety of questions that reflect the broad scope for historical-ecological research trajectories across scientific disciplines. Historical ecology encompasses research concerned with decadal, centennial, and millennial human-environmental interactions, and the consequences that those relationships have in the formation of contemporary landscapes. Six interrelated themes arose from our consensus-building workshop model: (1) climate and environmental change and variability; (2) multi-scalar, multi-disciplinary; (3) biodiversity and community ecology; (4) resource and environmental management and governance; (5) methods and applications; and (6) communication and policy. The 50 questions represented by these themes highlight meaningful trends in historical ecology that distill the field down to three explicit findings. First, historical ecology is fundamentally an applied research program. Second, this program seeks to understand long-term human-environment interactions with a focus on avoiding, mitigating, and reversing adverse ecological effects. Third, historical ecology is part of convergent trends toward transdisciplinary research science, which erodes scientific boundaries between the cultural and natural.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5325225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53252252017-03-09 Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda Shoemaker, Anna C. McKechnie, Iain Ekblom, Anneli Szabó, Péter Lane, Paul J. McAlvay, Alex C. Boles, Oliver J. Walshaw, Sarah Petek, Nik Gibbons, Kevin S. Quintana Morales, Erendira Anderson, Eugene N. Ibragimow, Aleksandra Podruczny, Grzegorz Vamosi, Jana C. Marks-Block, Tony LeCompte, Joyce K. Awâsis, Sākihitowin Nabess, Carly Sinclair, Paul Crumley, Carole L. PLoS One Research Article This paper presents the results of a consensus-driven process identifying 50 priority research questions for historical ecology obtained through crowdsourcing, literature reviews, and in-person workshopping. A deliberative approach was designed to maximize discussion and debate with defined outcomes. Two in-person workshops (in Sweden and Canada) over the course of two years and online discussions were peer facilitated to define specific key questions for historical ecology from anthropological and archaeological perspectives. The aim of this research is to showcase the variety of questions that reflect the broad scope for historical-ecological research trajectories across scientific disciplines. Historical ecology encompasses research concerned with decadal, centennial, and millennial human-environmental interactions, and the consequences that those relationships have in the formation of contemporary landscapes. Six interrelated themes arose from our consensus-building workshop model: (1) climate and environmental change and variability; (2) multi-scalar, multi-disciplinary; (3) biodiversity and community ecology; (4) resource and environmental management and governance; (5) methods and applications; and (6) communication and policy. The 50 questions represented by these themes highlight meaningful trends in historical ecology that distill the field down to three explicit findings. First, historical ecology is fundamentally an applied research program. Second, this program seeks to understand long-term human-environment interactions with a focus on avoiding, mitigating, and reversing adverse ecological effects. Third, historical ecology is part of convergent trends toward transdisciplinary research science, which erodes scientific boundaries between the cultural and natural. Public Library of Science 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5325225/ /pubmed/28235093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171883 Text en © 2017 Armstrong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda
Shoemaker, Anna C.
McKechnie, Iain
Ekblom, Anneli
Szabó, Péter
Lane, Paul J.
McAlvay, Alex C.
Boles, Oliver J.
Walshaw, Sarah
Petek, Nik
Gibbons, Kevin S.
Quintana Morales, Erendira
Anderson, Eugene N.
Ibragimow, Aleksandra
Podruczny, Grzegorz
Vamosi, Jana C.
Marks-Block, Tony
LeCompte, Joyce K.
Awâsis, Sākihitowin
Nabess, Carly
Sinclair, Paul
Crumley, Carole L.
Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
title Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
title_full Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
title_fullStr Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
title_full_unstemmed Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
title_short Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
title_sort anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28235093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171883
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongchelseygeralda anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT shoemakerannac anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT mckechnieiain anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT ekblomanneli anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT szabopeter anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT lanepaulj anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT mcalvayalexc anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT bolesoliverj anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT walshawsarah anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT peteknik anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT gibbonskevins anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT quintanamoraleserendira anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT andersoneugenen anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT ibragimowaleksandra anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT podrucznygrzegorz anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT vamosijanac anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT marksblocktony anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT lecomptejoycek anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT awasissakihitowin anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT nabesscarly anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT sinclairpaul anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects
AT crumleycarolel anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects