Cargando…
Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects
This paper presents the results of a consensus-driven process identifying 50 priority research questions for historical ecology obtained through crowdsourcing, literature reviews, and in-person workshopping. A deliberative approach was designed to maximize discussion and debate with defined outcomes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28235093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171883 |
_version_ | 1782510339341942784 |
---|---|
author | Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda Shoemaker, Anna C. McKechnie, Iain Ekblom, Anneli Szabó, Péter Lane, Paul J. McAlvay, Alex C. Boles, Oliver J. Walshaw, Sarah Petek, Nik Gibbons, Kevin S. Quintana Morales, Erendira Anderson, Eugene N. Ibragimow, Aleksandra Podruczny, Grzegorz Vamosi, Jana C. Marks-Block, Tony LeCompte, Joyce K. Awâsis, Sākihitowin Nabess, Carly Sinclair, Paul Crumley, Carole L. |
author_facet | Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda Shoemaker, Anna C. McKechnie, Iain Ekblom, Anneli Szabó, Péter Lane, Paul J. McAlvay, Alex C. Boles, Oliver J. Walshaw, Sarah Petek, Nik Gibbons, Kevin S. Quintana Morales, Erendira Anderson, Eugene N. Ibragimow, Aleksandra Podruczny, Grzegorz Vamosi, Jana C. Marks-Block, Tony LeCompte, Joyce K. Awâsis, Sākihitowin Nabess, Carly Sinclair, Paul Crumley, Carole L. |
author_sort | Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents the results of a consensus-driven process identifying 50 priority research questions for historical ecology obtained through crowdsourcing, literature reviews, and in-person workshopping. A deliberative approach was designed to maximize discussion and debate with defined outcomes. Two in-person workshops (in Sweden and Canada) over the course of two years and online discussions were peer facilitated to define specific key questions for historical ecology from anthropological and archaeological perspectives. The aim of this research is to showcase the variety of questions that reflect the broad scope for historical-ecological research trajectories across scientific disciplines. Historical ecology encompasses research concerned with decadal, centennial, and millennial human-environmental interactions, and the consequences that those relationships have in the formation of contemporary landscapes. Six interrelated themes arose from our consensus-building workshop model: (1) climate and environmental change and variability; (2) multi-scalar, multi-disciplinary; (3) biodiversity and community ecology; (4) resource and environmental management and governance; (5) methods and applications; and (6) communication and policy. The 50 questions represented by these themes highlight meaningful trends in historical ecology that distill the field down to three explicit findings. First, historical ecology is fundamentally an applied research program. Second, this program seeks to understand long-term human-environment interactions with a focus on avoiding, mitigating, and reversing adverse ecological effects. Third, historical ecology is part of convergent trends toward transdisciplinary research science, which erodes scientific boundaries between the cultural and natural. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5325225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53252252017-03-09 Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda Shoemaker, Anna C. McKechnie, Iain Ekblom, Anneli Szabó, Péter Lane, Paul J. McAlvay, Alex C. Boles, Oliver J. Walshaw, Sarah Petek, Nik Gibbons, Kevin S. Quintana Morales, Erendira Anderson, Eugene N. Ibragimow, Aleksandra Podruczny, Grzegorz Vamosi, Jana C. Marks-Block, Tony LeCompte, Joyce K. Awâsis, Sākihitowin Nabess, Carly Sinclair, Paul Crumley, Carole L. PLoS One Research Article This paper presents the results of a consensus-driven process identifying 50 priority research questions for historical ecology obtained through crowdsourcing, literature reviews, and in-person workshopping. A deliberative approach was designed to maximize discussion and debate with defined outcomes. Two in-person workshops (in Sweden and Canada) over the course of two years and online discussions were peer facilitated to define specific key questions for historical ecology from anthropological and archaeological perspectives. The aim of this research is to showcase the variety of questions that reflect the broad scope for historical-ecological research trajectories across scientific disciplines. Historical ecology encompasses research concerned with decadal, centennial, and millennial human-environmental interactions, and the consequences that those relationships have in the formation of contemporary landscapes. Six interrelated themes arose from our consensus-building workshop model: (1) climate and environmental change and variability; (2) multi-scalar, multi-disciplinary; (3) biodiversity and community ecology; (4) resource and environmental management and governance; (5) methods and applications; and (6) communication and policy. The 50 questions represented by these themes highlight meaningful trends in historical ecology that distill the field down to three explicit findings. First, historical ecology is fundamentally an applied research program. Second, this program seeks to understand long-term human-environment interactions with a focus on avoiding, mitigating, and reversing adverse ecological effects. Third, historical ecology is part of convergent trends toward transdisciplinary research science, which erodes scientific boundaries between the cultural and natural. Public Library of Science 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5325225/ /pubmed/28235093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171883 Text en © 2017 Armstrong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Armstrong, Chelsey Geralda Shoemaker, Anna C. McKechnie, Iain Ekblom, Anneli Szabó, Péter Lane, Paul J. McAlvay, Alex C. Boles, Oliver J. Walshaw, Sarah Petek, Nik Gibbons, Kevin S. Quintana Morales, Erendira Anderson, Eugene N. Ibragimow, Aleksandra Podruczny, Grzegorz Vamosi, Jana C. Marks-Block, Tony LeCompte, Joyce K. Awâsis, Sākihitowin Nabess, Carly Sinclair, Paul Crumley, Carole L. Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects |
title | Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects |
title_full | Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects |
title_fullStr | Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects |
title_full_unstemmed | Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects |
title_short | Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects |
title_sort | anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28235093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armstrongchelseygeralda anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT shoemakerannac anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT mckechnieiain anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT ekblomanneli anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT szabopeter anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT lanepaulj anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT mcalvayalexc anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT bolesoliverj anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT walshawsarah anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT peteknik anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT gibbonskevins anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT quintanamoraleserendira anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT andersoneugenen anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT ibragimowaleksandra anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT podrucznygrzegorz anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT vamosijanac anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT marksblocktony anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT lecomptejoycek anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT awasissakihitowin anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT nabesscarly anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT sinclairpaul anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects AT crumleycarolel anthropologicalcontributionstohistoricalecology50questionsinfiniteprospects |