Cargando…

The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND: Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) is a scoring system to evaluate disease activity and treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A DAS28 score of greater than 3.2 is a well-described limit for treatment intensification; however, the reliability of DAS28 might be overesti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen Hansen, Inger Marie, Asmussen Andreasen, Rikke, van Bui Hansen, Mark Nam, Emamifar, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27870649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000469
_version_ 1782510343443972096
author Jensen Hansen, Inger Marie
Asmussen Andreasen, Rikke
van Bui Hansen, Mark Nam
Emamifar, Amir
author_facet Jensen Hansen, Inger Marie
Asmussen Andreasen, Rikke
van Bui Hansen, Mark Nam
Emamifar, Amir
author_sort Jensen Hansen, Inger Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) is a scoring system to evaluate disease activity and treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A DAS28 score of greater than 3.2 is a well-described limit for treatment intensification; however, the reliability of DAS28 might be overestimated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of DAS28 in RA, especially focusing on a subgroup of patients with a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2. METHODS: Data from RA patients registered in the local part of Danish DANBIO Registry were collected in May 2015. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: First, those with DAS28 >3.2 with at least one swollen joint (SJ) or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (“objective group”), and second, patients with a DAS28 >3.2 who had no SJ, and CRP values were within the reference range (“subjective group”). Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were calculated for each group. We defined new score, DAS28 subjective, to focus on subjective parameters. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients were included; 198 (86.1%) and 32 (13.9%) patients were in the objective and subjective groups, respectively. Patients in the subjective group had lower mean values of DAS28 (P < 0.001) and Evaluator Global Assessment (P < 0.001) with less common immunoglobulin M rheumatoid factor (P < 0.001) and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity (P = 0.02) and contrarily higher mean values of tender joints (P = 0.04) and DAS28 based on subjective parameters (P = 0.003) compared with the objective group. CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatoid arthritis scoring systems should be used cautiously in patients who are considered for treatment intensification. Patients with central sensitization and psychological problems and those with false-positive diagnosis of RA are at high risk of overtreatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5325244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53252442017-03-08 The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study Jensen Hansen, Inger Marie Asmussen Andreasen, Rikke van Bui Hansen, Mark Nam Emamifar, Amir J Clin Rheumatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) is a scoring system to evaluate disease activity and treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A DAS28 score of greater than 3.2 is a well-described limit for treatment intensification; however, the reliability of DAS28 might be overestimated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of DAS28 in RA, especially focusing on a subgroup of patients with a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2. METHODS: Data from RA patients registered in the local part of Danish DANBIO Registry were collected in May 2015. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: First, those with DAS28 >3.2 with at least one swollen joint (SJ) or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (“objective group”), and second, patients with a DAS28 >3.2 who had no SJ, and CRP values were within the reference range (“subjective group”). Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were calculated for each group. We defined new score, DAS28 subjective, to focus on subjective parameters. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients were included; 198 (86.1%) and 32 (13.9%) patients were in the objective and subjective groups, respectively. Patients in the subjective group had lower mean values of DAS28 (P < 0.001) and Evaluator Global Assessment (P < 0.001) with less common immunoglobulin M rheumatoid factor (P < 0.001) and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity (P = 0.02) and contrarily higher mean values of tender joints (P = 0.04) and DAS28 based on subjective parameters (P = 0.003) compared with the objective group. CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatoid arthritis scoring systems should be used cautiously in patients who are considered for treatment intensification. Patients with central sensitization and psychological problems and those with false-positive diagnosis of RA are at high risk of overtreatment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-03 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5325244/ /pubmed/27870649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000469 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jensen Hansen, Inger Marie
Asmussen Andreasen, Rikke
van Bui Hansen, Mark Nam
Emamifar, Amir
The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study
title The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study
title_full The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study
title_fullStr The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study
title_short The Reliability of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints–C-Reactive Protein Might Be Overestimated in a Subgroup of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, When the Score Is Solely Based on Subjective Parameters: A Cross-sectional, Exploratory Study
title_sort reliability of disease activity score in 28 joints–c-reactive protein might be overestimated in a subgroup of rheumatoid arthritis patients, when the score is solely based on subjective parameters: a cross-sectional, exploratory study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27870649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000469
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenhanseningermarie thereliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy
AT asmussenandreasenrikke thereliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy
AT vanbuihansenmarknam thereliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy
AT emamifaramir thereliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy
AT jensenhanseningermarie reliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy
AT asmussenandreasenrikke reliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy
AT vanbuihansenmarknam reliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy
AT emamifaramir reliabilityofdiseaseactivityscorein28jointscreactiveproteinmightbeoverestimatedinasubgroupofrheumatoidarthritispatientswhenthescoreissolelybasedonsubjectiveparametersacrosssectionalexploratorystudy