Cargando…

On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms

Many people with difficulties following conversations in noisy settings have “clinically normal” audiograms, that is, tone thresholds better than 20 dB HL from 0.1 to 8 kHz. This review summarizes the possible causes of such difficulties, and examines established as well as promising new psychoacous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pienkowski, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Williams And Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28002080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000388
_version_ 1782510345727770624
author Pienkowski, Martin
author_facet Pienkowski, Martin
author_sort Pienkowski, Martin
collection PubMed
description Many people with difficulties following conversations in noisy settings have “clinically normal” audiograms, that is, tone thresholds better than 20 dB HL from 0.1 to 8 kHz. This review summarizes the possible causes of such difficulties, and examines established as well as promising new psychoacoustic and electrophysiologic approaches to differentiate between them. Deficits at the level of the auditory periphery are possible even if thresholds remain around 0 dB HL, and become probable when they reach 10 to 20 dB HL. Extending the audiogram beyond 8 kHz can identify early signs of noise-induced trauma to the vulnerable basal turn of the cochlea, and might point to “hidden” losses at lower frequencies that could compromise speech reception in noise. Listening difficulties can also be a consequence of impaired central auditory processing, resulting from lesions affecting the auditory brainstem or cortex, or from abnormal patterns of sound input during developmental sensitive periods and even in adulthood. Such auditory processing disorders should be distinguished from (cognitive) linguistic deficits, and from problems with attention or working memory that may not be specific to the auditory modality. Improved diagnosis of the causes of listening difficulties in noise should lead to better treatment outcomes, by optimizing auditory training procedures to the specific deficits of individual patients, for example.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5325255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Williams And Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53252552017-03-08 On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms Pienkowski, Martin Ear Hear Reviews Many people with difficulties following conversations in noisy settings have “clinically normal” audiograms, that is, tone thresholds better than 20 dB HL from 0.1 to 8 kHz. This review summarizes the possible causes of such difficulties, and examines established as well as promising new psychoacoustic and electrophysiologic approaches to differentiate between them. Deficits at the level of the auditory periphery are possible even if thresholds remain around 0 dB HL, and become probable when they reach 10 to 20 dB HL. Extending the audiogram beyond 8 kHz can identify early signs of noise-induced trauma to the vulnerable basal turn of the cochlea, and might point to “hidden” losses at lower frequencies that could compromise speech reception in noise. Listening difficulties can also be a consequence of impaired central auditory processing, resulting from lesions affecting the auditory brainstem or cortex, or from abnormal patterns of sound input during developmental sensitive periods and even in adulthood. Such auditory processing disorders should be distinguished from (cognitive) linguistic deficits, and from problems with attention or working memory that may not be specific to the auditory modality. Improved diagnosis of the causes of listening difficulties in noise should lead to better treatment outcomes, by optimizing auditory training procedures to the specific deficits of individual patients, for example. Williams And Wilkins 2017-03 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5325255/ /pubmed/28002080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000388 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reviews
Pienkowski, Martin
On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms
title On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms
title_full On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms
title_fullStr On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms
title_full_unstemmed On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms
title_short On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms
title_sort on the etiology of listening difficulties in noise despite clinically normal audiograms
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28002080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000388
work_keys_str_mv AT pienkowskimartin ontheetiologyoflisteningdifficultiesinnoisedespiteclinicallynormalaudiograms