Cargando…

The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies examining the diagnostic value of microRNA-210 for lung cancer have yielded inconsistent results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of microRNA-210 for lung cancer. Nine eligible studies involving 993 patients (554 lung cancer patients and 439 non-cancer pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Huqin, Wang, Huijuan, Zhang, Chao, Tong, Zhaohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557519
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11446
_version_ 1782510367381913600
author Yang, Huqin
Wang, Huijuan
Zhang, Chao
Tong, Zhaohui
author_facet Yang, Huqin
Wang, Huijuan
Zhang, Chao
Tong, Zhaohui
author_sort Yang, Huqin
collection PubMed
description Studies examining the diagnostic value of microRNA-210 for lung cancer have yielded inconsistent results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of microRNA-210 for lung cancer. Nine eligible studies involving 993 patients (554 lung cancer patients and 439 non-cancer patients) were independently identified, and the quality of these studies was assessed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) guidelines. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.89), 3.64 (95% CI, 2.54 to 5.21), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.51) and 8.78 (95% CI, 6.10 to 12.66), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83). These results indicated that microRNA-210 had moderate diagnostic value for lung cancer. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic value of microRNA-210.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5325363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53253632017-03-23 The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yang, Huqin Wang, Huijuan Zhang, Chao Tong, Zhaohui Oncotarget Research Paper Studies examining the diagnostic value of microRNA-210 for lung cancer have yielded inconsistent results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of microRNA-210 for lung cancer. Nine eligible studies involving 993 patients (554 lung cancer patients and 439 non-cancer patients) were independently identified, and the quality of these studies was assessed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) guidelines. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.89), 3.64 (95% CI, 2.54 to 5.21), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.51) and 8.78 (95% CI, 6.10 to 12.66), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83). These results indicated that microRNA-210 had moderate diagnostic value for lung cancer. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic value of microRNA-210. Impact Journals LLC 2016-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5325363/ /pubmed/27557519 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11446 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Yang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Yang, Huqin
Wang, Huijuan
Zhang, Chao
Tong, Zhaohui
The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of microrna-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557519
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11446
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghuqin theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghuijuan theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangchao theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tongzhaohui theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanghuqin accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghuijuan accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangchao accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tongzhaohui accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis