Cargando…
The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Studies examining the diagnostic value of microRNA-210 for lung cancer have yielded inconsistent results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of microRNA-210 for lung cancer. Nine eligible studies involving 993 patients (554 lung cancer patients and 439 non-cancer pa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557519 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11446 |
_version_ | 1782510367381913600 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Huqin Wang, Huijuan Zhang, Chao Tong, Zhaohui |
author_facet | Yang, Huqin Wang, Huijuan Zhang, Chao Tong, Zhaohui |
author_sort | Yang, Huqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies examining the diagnostic value of microRNA-210 for lung cancer have yielded inconsistent results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of microRNA-210 for lung cancer. Nine eligible studies involving 993 patients (554 lung cancer patients and 439 non-cancer patients) were independently identified, and the quality of these studies was assessed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) guidelines. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.89), 3.64 (95% CI, 2.54 to 5.21), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.51) and 8.78 (95% CI, 6.10 to 12.66), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83). These results indicated that microRNA-210 had moderate diagnostic value for lung cancer. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic value of microRNA-210. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5325363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53253632017-03-23 The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yang, Huqin Wang, Huijuan Zhang, Chao Tong, Zhaohui Oncotarget Research Paper Studies examining the diagnostic value of microRNA-210 for lung cancer have yielded inconsistent results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of microRNA-210 for lung cancer. Nine eligible studies involving 993 patients (554 lung cancer patients and 439 non-cancer patients) were independently identified, and the quality of these studies was assessed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) guidelines. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.89), 3.64 (95% CI, 2.54 to 5.21), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.51) and 8.78 (95% CI, 6.10 to 12.66), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83). These results indicated that microRNA-210 had moderate diagnostic value for lung cancer. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic value of microRNA-210. Impact Journals LLC 2016-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5325363/ /pubmed/27557519 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11446 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Yang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Yang, Huqin Wang, Huijuan Zhang, Chao Tong, Zhaohui The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of microrna-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557519 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghuqin theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghuijuan theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangchao theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tongzhaohui theaccuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanghuqin accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghuijuan accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangchao accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tongzhaohui accuracyofmicrorna210indiagnosinglungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |