Cargando…
Indeterminacy and the principle of need
The principle of need—the idea that resources should be allocated according to need—is often invoked in priority setting in the health care sector. In this article, I argue that a reasonable principle of need must be indeterminate, and examine three different ways that this can be dealt with: append...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28040857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9393-5 |
_version_ | 1782510432884359168 |
---|---|
author | Herlitz, Anders |
author_facet | Herlitz, Anders |
author_sort | Herlitz, Anders |
collection | PubMed |
description | The principle of need—the idea that resources should be allocated according to need—is often invoked in priority setting in the health care sector. In this article, I argue that a reasonable principle of need must be indeterminate, and examine three different ways that this can be dealt with: appendicizing the principle with further principles, imposing determinacy, or empowering decision makers. I argue that need must be conceptualized as a composite property composed of at least two factors: health shortfall and capacity to benefit. When one examines how the different factors relate to each other, one discovers that this is sometimes indeterminate. I illustrate this indeterminacy in this article by applying the small improvement argument. If the relation between the factors are always determinate, the comparative relation changes by a small adjustment. Yet, if two needs are dissimilar but of seemingly equal magnitude, the comparative relation does not change by a small adjustment of one of the factors. I then outline arguments in favor of each of the three strategies for dealing with indeterminacy, but also point out that all strategies have significant shortcomings. More research is needed concerning how to deal with this indeterminacy, and the most promising path seems to be to scrutinize the position of the principle of need among a plurality of relevant principles for priority setting in the health care sector. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5325837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53258372017-03-09 Indeterminacy and the principle of need Herlitz, Anders Theor Med Bioeth Article The principle of need—the idea that resources should be allocated according to need—is often invoked in priority setting in the health care sector. In this article, I argue that a reasonable principle of need must be indeterminate, and examine three different ways that this can be dealt with: appendicizing the principle with further principles, imposing determinacy, or empowering decision makers. I argue that need must be conceptualized as a composite property composed of at least two factors: health shortfall and capacity to benefit. When one examines how the different factors relate to each other, one discovers that this is sometimes indeterminate. I illustrate this indeterminacy in this article by applying the small improvement argument. If the relation between the factors are always determinate, the comparative relation changes by a small adjustment. Yet, if two needs are dissimilar but of seemingly equal magnitude, the comparative relation does not change by a small adjustment of one of the factors. I then outline arguments in favor of each of the three strategies for dealing with indeterminacy, but also point out that all strategies have significant shortcomings. More research is needed concerning how to deal with this indeterminacy, and the most promising path seems to be to scrutinize the position of the principle of need among a plurality of relevant principles for priority setting in the health care sector. Springer Netherlands 2016-12-31 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5325837/ /pubmed/28040857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9393-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Herlitz, Anders Indeterminacy and the principle of need |
title | Indeterminacy and the principle of need |
title_full | Indeterminacy and the principle of need |
title_fullStr | Indeterminacy and the principle of need |
title_full_unstemmed | Indeterminacy and the principle of need |
title_short | Indeterminacy and the principle of need |
title_sort | indeterminacy and the principle of need |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28040857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9393-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herlitzanders indeterminacyandtheprincipleofneed |