Cargando…

Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana)

Different types of social relationships can influence individual learning strategies in structured groups of animals. Studies on a number of avian species have suggested that local and/or stimulus enhancement are important ingredients of the respective species’ exploration modes. Our aim was to iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szabo, B., Bugnyar, T., Auersperg, A. M. I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0235-0
_version_ 1782510438072713216
author Szabo, B.
Bugnyar, T.
Auersperg, A. M. I.
author_facet Szabo, B.
Bugnyar, T.
Auersperg, A. M. I.
author_sort Szabo, B.
collection PubMed
description Different types of social relationships can influence individual learning strategies in structured groups of animals. Studies on a number of avian species have suggested that local and/or stimulus enhancement are important ingredients of the respective species’ exploration modes. Our aim was to identify the role of enhancement during object manipulation in different social contexts. We used focal observations to identify a linear dominance hierarchy as well as affiliative relationships between individuals in a group of 14 Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana, formerly goffini). Thereafter, in an unrewarded object choice task, several pairs of subjects were tested for a possible influence of social enhancement (local vs. stimulus) in three conditions: dominance, affiliation, and kinship. Our results suggest strong individual biases. Whereas previous studies on ravens and kea had indicated that enhancement in a non-food-related task was influenced by the social relationship between a demonstrator and an observer (affiliated – nonaffiliated), we found no such effects in our study group. In this context, Goffin’s cockatoos’ object learning seems to take place more on an individual level, despite their generally high motivation to manipulate nonfood items. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.3758/s13420-016-0235-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5325860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53258602017-03-09 Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana) Szabo, B. Bugnyar, T. Auersperg, A. M. I. Learn Behav Article Different types of social relationships can influence individual learning strategies in structured groups of animals. Studies on a number of avian species have suggested that local and/or stimulus enhancement are important ingredients of the respective species’ exploration modes. Our aim was to identify the role of enhancement during object manipulation in different social contexts. We used focal observations to identify a linear dominance hierarchy as well as affiliative relationships between individuals in a group of 14 Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana, formerly goffini). Thereafter, in an unrewarded object choice task, several pairs of subjects were tested for a possible influence of social enhancement (local vs. stimulus) in three conditions: dominance, affiliation, and kinship. Our results suggest strong individual biases. Whereas previous studies on ravens and kea had indicated that enhancement in a non-food-related task was influenced by the social relationship between a demonstrator and an observer (affiliated – nonaffiliated), we found no such effects in our study group. In this context, Goffin’s cockatoos’ object learning seems to take place more on an individual level, despite their generally high motivation to manipulate nonfood items. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.3758/s13420-016-0235-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-07-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5325860/ /pubmed/27406172 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0235-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Szabo, B.
Bugnyar, T.
Auersperg, A. M. I.
Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana)
title Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana)
title_full Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana)
title_fullStr Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana)
title_full_unstemmed Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana)
title_short Within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana)
title_sort within-group relationships and lack of social enhancement during object manipulation in captive goffin’s cockatoos (cacatua goffiniana)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0235-0
work_keys_str_mv AT szabob withingrouprelationshipsandlackofsocialenhancementduringobjectmanipulationincaptivegoffinscockatooscacatuagoffiniana
AT bugnyart withingrouprelationshipsandlackofsocialenhancementduringobjectmanipulationincaptivegoffinscockatooscacatuagoffiniana
AT auerspergami withingrouprelationshipsandlackofsocialenhancementduringobjectmanipulationincaptivegoffinscockatooscacatuagoffiniana