Cargando…
The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo
INTRODUCTION: The late screening of the majority of patients in sub Saharan region would justify a systematic antiretroviral treatment without breaking the country programs vision. he objective of this study was to determine the validity of biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28292165 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.25.210.9799 |
_version_ | 1782510510276608000 |
---|---|
author | Muzaliwa, Ildefonse Isia, Nancy Francisca Yenga, Dady Kikobya, Denis Lunjwire, Prince Katchunga, Philippe Bianga |
author_facet | Muzaliwa, Ildefonse Isia, Nancy Francisca Yenga, Dady Kikobya, Denis Lunjwire, Prince Katchunga, Philippe Bianga |
author_sort | Muzaliwa, Ildefonse |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The late screening of the majority of patients in sub Saharan region would justify a systematic antiretroviral treatment without breaking the country programs vision. he objective of this study was to determine the validity of biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment compared with systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of the people living with HIV in Bukavu city. METHODS: One thousand hundred and forty-nine (1149) records of people living with HIV (PLWIV) followed in three HIV health care facilities of Bukavu city were selected systematically. The ROC curve was constructed and analyzed to assess the validity of systematic antiretroviral therapy and a treatment based on WHO biological criteria. RESULTS: The CD4 median count was 196 /mm(3). On admission, only 17.3% of PLWHIV had a CD4≥500/mm(3). Compared to the criteria “systematic antiretroviral treatment”, biological eligibility criteria for antiretroviral therapy, had a sensitivity of 94.9%, a specificity of 100%, an AUC of 0.97 (0.96 to 0.98) (p <0.0001) and correlation coefficient of 0.88. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a systematic antiretroviral treatment of seropositive patients newly detected for the HIV in sub-Saharan Africa area must be requirement outwards WHO current recommendations. Also, in order to optimize expected outcome of a systematic treatment, a systematic screening in the high-risk groups of this area should be recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5326198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53261982017-03-10 The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo Muzaliwa, Ildefonse Isia, Nancy Francisca Yenga, Dady Kikobya, Denis Lunjwire, Prince Katchunga, Philippe Bianga Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: The late screening of the majority of patients in sub Saharan region would justify a systematic antiretroviral treatment without breaking the country programs vision. he objective of this study was to determine the validity of biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment compared with systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of the people living with HIV in Bukavu city. METHODS: One thousand hundred and forty-nine (1149) records of people living with HIV (PLWIV) followed in three HIV health care facilities of Bukavu city were selected systematically. The ROC curve was constructed and analyzed to assess the validity of systematic antiretroviral therapy and a treatment based on WHO biological criteria. RESULTS: The CD4 median count was 196 /mm(3). On admission, only 17.3% of PLWHIV had a CD4≥500/mm(3). Compared to the criteria “systematic antiretroviral treatment”, biological eligibility criteria for antiretroviral therapy, had a sensitivity of 94.9%, a specificity of 100%, an AUC of 0.97 (0.96 to 0.98) (p <0.0001) and correlation coefficient of 0.88. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a systematic antiretroviral treatment of seropositive patients newly detected for the HIV in sub-Saharan Africa area must be requirement outwards WHO current recommendations. Also, in order to optimize expected outcome of a systematic treatment, a systematic screening in the high-risk groups of this area should be recommended. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2016-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5326198/ /pubmed/28292165 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.25.210.9799 Text en © Ildefonse Muzaliwa et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Muzaliwa, Ildefonse Isia, Nancy Francisca Yenga, Dady Kikobya, Denis Lunjwire, Prince Katchunga, Philippe Bianga The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
title | The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
title_full | The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
title_fullStr | The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
title_full_unstemmed | The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
title_short | The validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the HIV in the Southern Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
title_sort | validity of the biological eligibility criteria to antiretroviral treatment in comparison to the systematic antiretroviral treatment in a cohort of people living with the hiv in the southern kivu province, democratic republic of the congo |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28292165 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.25.210.9799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muzaliwaildefonse thevalidityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT isianancyfrancisca thevalidityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT yengadady thevalidityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT kikobyadenis thevalidityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT lunjwireprince thevalidityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT katchungaphilippebianga thevalidityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT muzaliwaildefonse validityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT isianancyfrancisca validityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT yengadady validityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT kikobyadenis validityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT lunjwireprince validityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo AT katchungaphilippebianga validityofthebiologicaleligibilitycriteriatoantiretroviraltreatmentincomparisontothesystematicantiretroviraltreatmentinacohortofpeoplelivingwiththehivinthesouthernkivuprovincedemocraticrepublicofthecongo |