Cargando…
Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests
BACKGROUND: There is a growing recognition for the need to expand our evidence base for the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests. Many international bodies are calling for diagnostic randomized controlled trials to provide the most rigorous evidence of impact to patient health. Although these...
Autores principales: | Ferrante di Ruffano, Lavinia, Dinnes, Jacqueline, Sitch, Alice J., Hyde, Chris, Deeks, Jonathan J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28236806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0287-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Can we implement findings from RCTs of diagnostic tests? A review of reporting of test-treat interventions
por: di Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
How well documented are testing strategies and outcome measurement methods in trials of tests? A comparison of reporting quality in test-treatment and monitoring RCTS
por: Dinnes, Jac, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Barriers to blinding: an analysis of the feasibility of blinding in test-treatment RCTS
por: di Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions
por: Ferrante di Ruffano, Lavinia, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
TOMAS-R: A template to identify and plan analysis for clinically important variation and multiplicity in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews
por: Mallett, Sue, et al.
Publicado: (2022)