Cargando…
Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions
The probability of an event's occurrence affects event-related potentials (ERPs) on electroencephalograms. The relation between probability and potentials has been discussed by using a quantity called surprise that represents the self-information that humans receive from the event. Previous stu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28289380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00075 |
_version_ | 1782510598255280128 |
---|---|
author | Higashi, Hiroshi Minami, Tetsuto Nakauchi, Shigeki |
author_facet | Higashi, Hiroshi Minami, Tetsuto Nakauchi, Shigeki |
author_sort | Higashi, Hiroshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The probability of an event's occurrence affects event-related potentials (ERPs) on electroencephalograms. The relation between probability and potentials has been discussed by using a quantity called surprise that represents the self-information that humans receive from the event. Previous studies have estimated surprise based on the probability distribution in a stationary state. Our hypothesis is that state transitions also play an important role in the estimation of surprise. In this study, we compare the effects of surprise on the ERPs based on two models that generate an event sequence: a model of a stationary state and a model with state transitions. To compare these effects, we generate the event sequences with Markov chains to avoid a situation that the state transition probability converges with the stationary probability by the accumulation of the event observations. Our trial-by-trial model-based analysis showed that the stationary probability better explains the P3b component and the state transition probability better explains the P3a component. The effect on P3a suggests that the internal model, which is constantly and automatically generated by the human brain to estimate the probability distribution of the events, approximates the model with state transitions because Bayesian surprise, which represents the degree of updating of the internal model, is highly reflected in P3a. The global effect reflected in P3b, however, may not be related to the internal model because P3b depends on the stationary probability distribution. The results suggest that an internal model can represent state transitions and the global effect is generated by a different mechanism than the one for forming the internal model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5326784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53267842017-03-13 Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions Higashi, Hiroshi Minami, Tetsuto Nakauchi, Shigeki Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The probability of an event's occurrence affects event-related potentials (ERPs) on electroencephalograms. The relation between probability and potentials has been discussed by using a quantity called surprise that represents the self-information that humans receive from the event. Previous studies have estimated surprise based on the probability distribution in a stationary state. Our hypothesis is that state transitions also play an important role in the estimation of surprise. In this study, we compare the effects of surprise on the ERPs based on two models that generate an event sequence: a model of a stationary state and a model with state transitions. To compare these effects, we generate the event sequences with Markov chains to avoid a situation that the state transition probability converges with the stationary probability by the accumulation of the event observations. Our trial-by-trial model-based analysis showed that the stationary probability better explains the P3b component and the state transition probability better explains the P3a component. The effect on P3a suggests that the internal model, which is constantly and automatically generated by the human brain to estimate the probability distribution of the events, approximates the model with state transitions because Bayesian surprise, which represents the degree of updating of the internal model, is highly reflected in P3a. The global effect reflected in P3b, however, may not be related to the internal model because P3b depends on the stationary probability distribution. The results suggest that an internal model can represent state transitions and the global effect is generated by a different mechanism than the one for forming the internal model. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5326784/ /pubmed/28289380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00075 Text en Copyright © 2017 Higashi, Minami and Nakauchi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Higashi, Hiroshi Minami, Tetsuto Nakauchi, Shigeki Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions |
title | Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions |
title_full | Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions |
title_fullStr | Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions |
title_short | Variation in Event-Related Potentials by State Transitions |
title_sort | variation in event-related potentials by state transitions |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28289380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT higashihiroshi variationineventrelatedpotentialsbystatetransitions AT minamitetsuto variationineventrelatedpotentialsbystatetransitions AT nakauchishigeki variationineventrelatedpotentialsbystatetransitions |