Cargando…

Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on how best to define low muscle mass in patients with end‐stage renal disease. Use of muscle mass normalized to height‐squared has been suggested by geriatric societies but may underestimate sarcopenia, particularly in the setting of excess adiposity. We compared f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kittiskulnam, Piyawan, Carrero, Juan J., Chertow, Glenn M., Kaysen, George A., Delgado, Cynthia, Johansen, Kirsten L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27897415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12130
_version_ 1782510605806075904
author Kittiskulnam, Piyawan
Carrero, Juan J.
Chertow, Glenn M.
Kaysen, George A.
Delgado, Cynthia
Johansen, Kirsten L.
author_facet Kittiskulnam, Piyawan
Carrero, Juan J.
Chertow, Glenn M.
Kaysen, George A.
Delgado, Cynthia
Johansen, Kirsten L.
author_sort Kittiskulnam, Piyawan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on how best to define low muscle mass in patients with end‐stage renal disease. Use of muscle mass normalized to height‐squared has been suggested by geriatric societies but may underestimate sarcopenia, particularly in the setting of excess adiposity. We compared four definitions of low muscle mass in a prevalent hemodialysis cohort. METHODS: ACTIVE/ADIPOSE enrolled prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis from the San Francisco and Atlanta areas from June 2009 to August 2011. Whole‐body muscle mass was estimated using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy, performed before a midweek dialysis session (n = 645; age 56.7 ± 14.5 years, 41% women). We defined low muscle mass as muscle mass of 2SD or more below sex‐specific bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy‐derived means for young adults (18–49 years) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and indexed to height(2), body weight (percentage), body surface area (BSA) by the DuBois formula, or Quételet's body mass index (BMI). We compared prevalence of low muscle mass among the four methods and assessed their correlation with strength and physical performance. RESULTS: The prevalence of low muscle mass ranged from 8 to 32%. Muscle mass indexed to height(2) classified the smallest percentage of patients as having low muscle mass, particularly among women, whereas indexing by BSA classified the largest percentage. Low muscle mass/height(2) was present almost exclusively among normal or underweight patients, whereas indexing to body weight and BMI classified more overweight and obese patients as having low muscle mass. Handgrip strength was lower among those with low muscle mass by all methods except height(2). Handgrip strength was directly and modestly correlated with muscle mass normalized by percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI (ρ = 0.43, 0.56, and, 0.64, respectively) and less so with muscle/height(2) (ρ = 0.31, P < 0.001). The difference in grip strength among patients with low vs. normal muscle mass was largest according to muscle/BMI (−6.84 kg, 95% CI −8.66 to −5.02, P < 0.001). There were significant direct correlations of gait speed with muscle mass indexed to percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI but not with muscle mass indexed to height(2). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal muscle mass normalized to height(2) may underestimate the prevalence of low muscle mass, particularly among overweight and obese patients on hemodialysis. Valid detection of sarcopenia among obese patients receiving hemodialysis requires adjustment for body size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5326818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53268182017-03-03 Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence Kittiskulnam, Piyawan Carrero, Juan J. Chertow, Glenn M. Kaysen, George A. Delgado, Cynthia Johansen, Kirsten L. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Original Articles BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on how best to define low muscle mass in patients with end‐stage renal disease. Use of muscle mass normalized to height‐squared has been suggested by geriatric societies but may underestimate sarcopenia, particularly in the setting of excess adiposity. We compared four definitions of low muscle mass in a prevalent hemodialysis cohort. METHODS: ACTIVE/ADIPOSE enrolled prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis from the San Francisco and Atlanta areas from June 2009 to August 2011. Whole‐body muscle mass was estimated using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy, performed before a midweek dialysis session (n = 645; age 56.7 ± 14.5 years, 41% women). We defined low muscle mass as muscle mass of 2SD or more below sex‐specific bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy‐derived means for young adults (18–49 years) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and indexed to height(2), body weight (percentage), body surface area (BSA) by the DuBois formula, or Quételet's body mass index (BMI). We compared prevalence of low muscle mass among the four methods and assessed their correlation with strength and physical performance. RESULTS: The prevalence of low muscle mass ranged from 8 to 32%. Muscle mass indexed to height(2) classified the smallest percentage of patients as having low muscle mass, particularly among women, whereas indexing by BSA classified the largest percentage. Low muscle mass/height(2) was present almost exclusively among normal or underweight patients, whereas indexing to body weight and BMI classified more overweight and obese patients as having low muscle mass. Handgrip strength was lower among those with low muscle mass by all methods except height(2). Handgrip strength was directly and modestly correlated with muscle mass normalized by percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI (ρ = 0.43, 0.56, and, 0.64, respectively) and less so with muscle/height(2) (ρ = 0.31, P < 0.001). The difference in grip strength among patients with low vs. normal muscle mass was largest according to muscle/BMI (−6.84 kg, 95% CI −8.66 to −5.02, P < 0.001). There were significant direct correlations of gait speed with muscle mass indexed to percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI but not with muscle mass indexed to height(2). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal muscle mass normalized to height(2) may underestimate the prevalence of low muscle mass, particularly among overweight and obese patients on hemodialysis. Valid detection of sarcopenia among obese patients receiving hemodialysis requires adjustment for body size. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-11 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5326818/ /pubmed/27897415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12130 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kittiskulnam, Piyawan
Carrero, Juan J.
Chertow, Glenn M.
Kaysen, George A.
Delgado, Cynthia
Johansen, Kirsten L.
Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence
title Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence
title_full Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence
title_fullStr Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence
title_short Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence
title_sort sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: weighing the evidence
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27897415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12130
work_keys_str_mv AT kittiskulnampiyawan sarcopeniaamongpatientsreceivinghemodialysisweighingtheevidence
AT carrerojuanj sarcopeniaamongpatientsreceivinghemodialysisweighingtheevidence
AT chertowglennm sarcopeniaamongpatientsreceivinghemodialysisweighingtheevidence
AT kaysengeorgea sarcopeniaamongpatientsreceivinghemodialysisweighingtheevidence
AT delgadocynthia sarcopeniaamongpatientsreceivinghemodialysisweighingtheevidence
AT johansenkirstenl sarcopeniaamongpatientsreceivinghemodialysisweighingtheevidence