Cargando…

Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft

PURPOSE: We describe our experience with the Permacol graft in anophthalmic socket reconstruction, and compare it to the autologous buccal mucosal graft, emphasizing the postoperative vascularization and contraction of each graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. We measured the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teo, Livia, Woo, Young Jun, Kim, Dong Kyu, Kim, Chang Yeom, Yoon, Jin Sook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243018
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.9
_version_ 1782510677100855296
author Teo, Livia
Woo, Young Jun
Kim, Dong Kyu
Kim, Chang Yeom
Yoon, Jin Sook
author_facet Teo, Livia
Woo, Young Jun
Kim, Dong Kyu
Kim, Chang Yeom
Yoon, Jin Sook
author_sort Teo, Livia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We describe our experience with the Permacol graft in anophthalmic socket reconstruction, and compare it to the autologous buccal mucosal graft, emphasizing the postoperative vascularization and contraction of each graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. We measured the time necessary for the graft surface to be completely vascularized, as well as the fornix depth of the conjunctival sac in anophthalmic patients. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent Permacol graft reconstruction, with 44 undergoing buccal mucosal graft reconstruction. Seven eyelids (70%) in the Permacol group had a good outcome, with improvement in lower eyelid position and prosthesis retention. Nine out of 10 eyelids (90%) in this group showed complete vascularization of the graft at 2.6 ± 1.9 months postoperatively, while the grafted buccal mucosa was fully vascularized at 1.1 ± 0.3 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). Postoperative fornix depth in the Permacol group was 9.1 ± 2.2 mm, compared to 14.9 ± 4.5 mm in the buccal mucosal graft group (p < 0.01). Mean increases in fornix depth were 33.1% and 67.9% of the mean vertical length of the implanted graft. CONCLUSIONS: The Permacol graft can be useful as spacer graft material in anophthalmic socket patients. It takes longer to vascularize, and undergoes greater graft shrinkage with time, compared to the buccal mucosal graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5327181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53271812017-02-27 Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft Teo, Livia Woo, Young Jun Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Chang Yeom Yoon, Jin Sook Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: We describe our experience with the Permacol graft in anophthalmic socket reconstruction, and compare it to the autologous buccal mucosal graft, emphasizing the postoperative vascularization and contraction of each graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. We measured the time necessary for the graft surface to be completely vascularized, as well as the fornix depth of the conjunctival sac in anophthalmic patients. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent Permacol graft reconstruction, with 44 undergoing buccal mucosal graft reconstruction. Seven eyelids (70%) in the Permacol group had a good outcome, with improvement in lower eyelid position and prosthesis retention. Nine out of 10 eyelids (90%) in this group showed complete vascularization of the graft at 2.6 ± 1.9 months postoperatively, while the grafted buccal mucosa was fully vascularized at 1.1 ± 0.3 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). Postoperative fornix depth in the Permacol group was 9.1 ± 2.2 mm, compared to 14.9 ± 4.5 mm in the buccal mucosal graft group (p < 0.01). Mean increases in fornix depth were 33.1% and 67.9% of the mean vertical length of the implanted graft. CONCLUSIONS: The Permacol graft can be useful as spacer graft material in anophthalmic socket patients. It takes longer to vascularize, and undergoes greater graft shrinkage with time, compared to the buccal mucosal graft. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017-02 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5327181/ /pubmed/28243018 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.9 Text en © 2017 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Teo, Livia
Woo, Young Jun
Kim, Dong Kyu
Kim, Chang Yeom
Yoon, Jin Sook
Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft
title Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft
title_full Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft
title_fullStr Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft
title_short Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft
title_sort surgical outcomes of porcine acellular dermis graft in anophthalmic socket: comparison with oral mucosa graft
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243018
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.9
work_keys_str_mv AT teolivia surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft
AT wooyoungjun surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft
AT kimdongkyu surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft
AT kimchangyeom surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft
AT yoonjinsook surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft