Cargando…
Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft
PURPOSE: We describe our experience with the Permacol graft in anophthalmic socket reconstruction, and compare it to the autologous buccal mucosal graft, emphasizing the postoperative vascularization and contraction of each graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. We measured the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Ophthalmological Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243018 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.9 |
_version_ | 1782510677100855296 |
---|---|
author | Teo, Livia Woo, Young Jun Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Chang Yeom Yoon, Jin Sook |
author_facet | Teo, Livia Woo, Young Jun Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Chang Yeom Yoon, Jin Sook |
author_sort | Teo, Livia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We describe our experience with the Permacol graft in anophthalmic socket reconstruction, and compare it to the autologous buccal mucosal graft, emphasizing the postoperative vascularization and contraction of each graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. We measured the time necessary for the graft surface to be completely vascularized, as well as the fornix depth of the conjunctival sac in anophthalmic patients. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent Permacol graft reconstruction, with 44 undergoing buccal mucosal graft reconstruction. Seven eyelids (70%) in the Permacol group had a good outcome, with improvement in lower eyelid position and prosthesis retention. Nine out of 10 eyelids (90%) in this group showed complete vascularization of the graft at 2.6 ± 1.9 months postoperatively, while the grafted buccal mucosa was fully vascularized at 1.1 ± 0.3 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). Postoperative fornix depth in the Permacol group was 9.1 ± 2.2 mm, compared to 14.9 ± 4.5 mm in the buccal mucosal graft group (p < 0.01). Mean increases in fornix depth were 33.1% and 67.9% of the mean vertical length of the implanted graft. CONCLUSIONS: The Permacol graft can be useful as spacer graft material in anophthalmic socket patients. It takes longer to vascularize, and undergoes greater graft shrinkage with time, compared to the buccal mucosal graft. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5327181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Ophthalmological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53271812017-02-27 Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft Teo, Livia Woo, Young Jun Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Chang Yeom Yoon, Jin Sook Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: We describe our experience with the Permacol graft in anophthalmic socket reconstruction, and compare it to the autologous buccal mucosal graft, emphasizing the postoperative vascularization and contraction of each graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. We measured the time necessary for the graft surface to be completely vascularized, as well as the fornix depth of the conjunctival sac in anophthalmic patients. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent Permacol graft reconstruction, with 44 undergoing buccal mucosal graft reconstruction. Seven eyelids (70%) in the Permacol group had a good outcome, with improvement in lower eyelid position and prosthesis retention. Nine out of 10 eyelids (90%) in this group showed complete vascularization of the graft at 2.6 ± 1.9 months postoperatively, while the grafted buccal mucosa was fully vascularized at 1.1 ± 0.3 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). Postoperative fornix depth in the Permacol group was 9.1 ± 2.2 mm, compared to 14.9 ± 4.5 mm in the buccal mucosal graft group (p < 0.01). Mean increases in fornix depth were 33.1% and 67.9% of the mean vertical length of the implanted graft. CONCLUSIONS: The Permacol graft can be useful as spacer graft material in anophthalmic socket patients. It takes longer to vascularize, and undergoes greater graft shrinkage with time, compared to the buccal mucosal graft. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017-02 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5327181/ /pubmed/28243018 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.9 Text en © 2017 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Teo, Livia Woo, Young Jun Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Chang Yeom Yoon, Jin Sook Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft |
title | Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft |
title_full | Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft |
title_fullStr | Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft |
title_short | Surgical Outcomes of Porcine Acellular Dermis Graft in Anophthalmic Socket: Comparison with Oral Mucosa Graft |
title_sort | surgical outcomes of porcine acellular dermis graft in anophthalmic socket: comparison with oral mucosa graft |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243018 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teolivia surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft AT wooyoungjun surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft AT kimdongkyu surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft AT kimchangyeom surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft AT yoonjinsook surgicaloutcomesofporcineacellulardermisgraftinanophthalmicsocketcomparisonwithoralmucosagraft |