Cargando…
Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community
BACKGROUND: Developing new medicines relies on the successful conduct of clinical trials. As trial protocols become more arduous, it becomes harder to recruit and retain patient volunteers, although recent efforts such as OMERACT and I-SPY2 show that partnering with patients can be beneficial. We so...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x |
_version_ | 1782510752024756224 |
---|---|
author | DasMahapatra, Pronabesh Raja, Priya Gilbert, Jeremy Wicks, Paul |
author_facet | DasMahapatra, Pronabesh Raja, Priya Gilbert, Jeremy Wicks, Paul |
author_sort | DasMahapatra, Pronabesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Developing new medicines relies on the successful conduct of clinical trials. As trial protocols become more arduous, it becomes harder to recruit and retain patient volunteers, although recent efforts such as OMERACT and I-SPY2 show that partnering with patients can be beneficial. We sought to describe drivers and barriers to trial participation, as well as condition-specific trial preferences. METHODS: An online survey was fielded via the patient-powered research network PatientsLikeMe to 1,621 members living with nine selected chronic health conditions. Questions included demographics, trial experience, reasons for non-participation, questions relating to aspects of trial design, and an adaptation of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) for trial satisfaction. RESULTS: Mean age of respondents was 55 years; most patients were white (93%), female (67%), and living in the United States (72%). Primary conditions were MS (21%), Parkinson’s (20%), fibromyalgia (15%), ALS (10%), type 2 diabetes (10%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, 8%), epilepsy (8%), major depressive disorder (MDD, 5%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 3%). Most patients had not discussed a trial with their physician and only 21% had ever enrolled, with rates highest in ALS (36%), Parkinson’s disease (36%) and MS (20%) and lowest among SLE (9%), MDD (11%) and Fibromyalgia (11%). Common reasons for non-participation were eligibility criteria, inconvenience of travel and concerns about side effects. NPS suggested that many patients were unsatisfied; patients with lupus, epilepsy, RA, and fibromyalgia reported negative scores, i.e. they would dissuade other patients like them from taking part in trials. The most important considerations in trial participation were the opportunity to improve one’s own health and that of others, the reputation of the institution, and having medical bills covered in case of injury. Least important were remuneration and possibility of receiving a placebo. ALS patients were more willing to tolerate undesirable aspects of trials. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients are willing to enroll yet very few are invited. When they do, trial participation is often burdensome, but patients are willing to help improve their design. Researchers should let patients help design better trials to overcome recruitment and retention issues and hasten the development of new medicines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5327530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53275302017-03-03 Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community DasMahapatra, Pronabesh Raja, Priya Gilbert, Jeremy Wicks, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Developing new medicines relies on the successful conduct of clinical trials. As trial protocols become more arduous, it becomes harder to recruit and retain patient volunteers, although recent efforts such as OMERACT and I-SPY2 show that partnering with patients can be beneficial. We sought to describe drivers and barriers to trial participation, as well as condition-specific trial preferences. METHODS: An online survey was fielded via the patient-powered research network PatientsLikeMe to 1,621 members living with nine selected chronic health conditions. Questions included demographics, trial experience, reasons for non-participation, questions relating to aspects of trial design, and an adaptation of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) for trial satisfaction. RESULTS: Mean age of respondents was 55 years; most patients were white (93%), female (67%), and living in the United States (72%). Primary conditions were MS (21%), Parkinson’s (20%), fibromyalgia (15%), ALS (10%), type 2 diabetes (10%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, 8%), epilepsy (8%), major depressive disorder (MDD, 5%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 3%). Most patients had not discussed a trial with their physician and only 21% had ever enrolled, with rates highest in ALS (36%), Parkinson’s disease (36%) and MS (20%) and lowest among SLE (9%), MDD (11%) and Fibromyalgia (11%). Common reasons for non-participation were eligibility criteria, inconvenience of travel and concerns about side effects. NPS suggested that many patients were unsatisfied; patients with lupus, epilepsy, RA, and fibromyalgia reported negative scores, i.e. they would dissuade other patients like them from taking part in trials. The most important considerations in trial participation were the opportunity to improve one’s own health and that of others, the reputation of the institution, and having medical bills covered in case of injury. Least important were remuneration and possibility of receiving a placebo. ALS patients were more willing to tolerate undesirable aspects of trials. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients are willing to enroll yet very few are invited. When they do, trial participation is often burdensome, but patients are willing to help improve their design. Researchers should let patients help design better trials to overcome recruitment and retention issues and hasten the development of new medicines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5327530/ /pubmed/28241758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article DasMahapatra, Pronabesh Raja, Priya Gilbert, Jeremy Wicks, Paul Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community |
title | Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community |
title_full | Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community |
title_fullStr | Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community |
title_short | Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community |
title_sort | clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasmahapatrapronabesh clinicaltrialsfromthepatientperspectivesurveyinanonlinepatientcommunity AT rajapriya clinicaltrialsfromthepatientperspectivesurveyinanonlinepatientcommunity AT gilbertjeremy clinicaltrialsfromthepatientperspectivesurveyinanonlinepatientcommunity AT wickspaul clinicaltrialsfromthepatientperspectivesurveyinanonlinepatientcommunity |