Cargando…

Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and as a result repeat CS is common. The optimal mode of delivery in women with one previous CS is widely debated and the risks to the infant are understudied. The aim of the current study was to evaluate if women with a trial of labo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Neill, Sinéad M., Agerbo, Esben, Khashan, Ali S., Kearney, Patricia M., Henriksen, Tine Brink, Greene, Richard A., Kenny, Louise C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1255-2
_version_ 1782510763022221312
author O’Neill, Sinéad M.
Agerbo, Esben
Khashan, Ali S.
Kearney, Patricia M.
Henriksen, Tine Brink
Greene, Richard A.
Kenny, Louise C.
author_facet O’Neill, Sinéad M.
Agerbo, Esben
Khashan, Ali S.
Kearney, Patricia M.
Henriksen, Tine Brink
Greene, Richard A.
Kenny, Louise C.
author_sort O’Neill, Sinéad M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and as a result repeat CS is common. The optimal mode of delivery in women with one previous CS is widely debated and the risks to the infant are understudied. The aim of the current study was to evaluate if women with a trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) had an increased odds of neonatal and infant death compared to women with an elective repeat CS (ERCS). METHODS: A population register-based cohort study was conducted in Denmark between 1982 and 2010. All women with two deliveries [in which the first was a CS, and the second was an uncomplicated, term delivery (n = 61,626)] were included in the study. Logistic regression models were used to report adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the odds of death according to mode of delivery. The main outcome measures were neonatal death (early and late) and infant death. RESULTS: Women with a TOLAC had an increased odds of neonatal death (AOR 1 · 87, 95% CI 1 · 12 to 3 · 12) due to an increased risk of early neonatal death (AOR 2 · 06, 95% CI 1 · 19 to 3 · 56) and no effect on late neonatal death (AOR 0 · 97, 95% CI 0 · 22 to 4 · 32), or infant death (AOR 1 · 12, 95% CI 0 · 79 to 1 · 59) when compared to the reference group of women with an ERCS. There was evidence of a cohort effect as the increased odds of neonatal death (AOR 3 · 89, 95% CI 1 · 33 to 11 · 39) was most significant in the earlier years (1982–1991) and gradually disappeared (AOR 1 · 01, 95% CI 0 · 44 to 2 · 31) in the later years (2002–2010). CONCLUSIONS: Although an increased risk of neonatal death was found in women with a TOLAC, there was evidence of a cohort effect, which showed this increased odds disappearing over time. Advances in modern healthcare including improved monitoring and earlier detection of underlying pregnancy complications may explain the findings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1255-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5327578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53275782017-03-03 Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study O’Neill, Sinéad M. Agerbo, Esben Khashan, Ali S. Kearney, Patricia M. Henriksen, Tine Brink Greene, Richard A. Kenny, Louise C. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and as a result repeat CS is common. The optimal mode of delivery in women with one previous CS is widely debated and the risks to the infant are understudied. The aim of the current study was to evaluate if women with a trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) had an increased odds of neonatal and infant death compared to women with an elective repeat CS (ERCS). METHODS: A population register-based cohort study was conducted in Denmark between 1982 and 2010. All women with two deliveries [in which the first was a CS, and the second was an uncomplicated, term delivery (n = 61,626)] were included in the study. Logistic regression models were used to report adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the odds of death according to mode of delivery. The main outcome measures were neonatal death (early and late) and infant death. RESULTS: Women with a TOLAC had an increased odds of neonatal death (AOR 1 · 87, 95% CI 1 · 12 to 3 · 12) due to an increased risk of early neonatal death (AOR 2 · 06, 95% CI 1 · 19 to 3 · 56) and no effect on late neonatal death (AOR 0 · 97, 95% CI 0 · 22 to 4 · 32), or infant death (AOR 1 · 12, 95% CI 0 · 79 to 1 · 59) when compared to the reference group of women with an ERCS. There was evidence of a cohort effect as the increased odds of neonatal death (AOR 3 · 89, 95% CI 1 · 33 to 11 · 39) was most significant in the earlier years (1982–1991) and gradually disappeared (AOR 1 · 01, 95% CI 0 · 44 to 2 · 31) in the later years (2002–2010). CONCLUSIONS: Although an increased risk of neonatal death was found in women with a TOLAC, there was evidence of a cohort effect, which showed this increased odds disappearing over time. Advances in modern healthcare including improved monitoring and earlier detection of underlying pregnancy complications may explain the findings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1255-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5327578/ /pubmed/28241870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1255-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Neill, Sinéad M.
Agerbo, Esben
Khashan, Ali S.
Kearney, Patricia M.
Henriksen, Tine Brink
Greene, Richard A.
Kenny, Louise C.
Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
title Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
title_full Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
title_fullStr Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
title_short Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
title_sort trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1255-2
work_keys_str_mv AT oneillsineadm trialoflabouraftercaesareansectionandtheriskofneonatalandinfantdeathanationwidecohortstudy
AT agerboesben trialoflabouraftercaesareansectionandtheriskofneonatalandinfantdeathanationwidecohortstudy
AT khashanalis trialoflabouraftercaesareansectionandtheriskofneonatalandinfantdeathanationwidecohortstudy
AT kearneypatriciam trialoflabouraftercaesareansectionandtheriskofneonatalandinfantdeathanationwidecohortstudy
AT henriksentinebrink trialoflabouraftercaesareansectionandtheriskofneonatalandinfantdeathanationwidecohortstudy
AT greenericharda trialoflabouraftercaesareansectionandtheriskofneonatalandinfantdeathanationwidecohortstudy
AT kennylouisec trialoflabouraftercaesareansectionandtheriskofneonatalandinfantdeathanationwidecohortstudy