Cargando…
Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations
OBJECTIVE: The Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) program at Eastern Health Clinical School uses volunteer patients with chronic illnesses in consultation-based medical student education. The PTA program aims to develop students’ patient-centeredness and associated skills. Our study aims, 1) to identi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S119611 |
_version_ | 1782510808108892160 |
---|---|
author | Hogan, Nicola Li, Henry Pezaro, Carmel Roberts, Noel Schmidt, Erica Martin, Jenepher |
author_facet | Hogan, Nicola Li, Henry Pezaro, Carmel Roberts, Noel Schmidt, Erica Martin, Jenepher |
author_sort | Hogan, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) program at Eastern Health Clinical School uses volunteer patients with chronic illnesses in consultation-based medical student education. The PTA program aims to develop students’ patient-centeredness and associated skills. Our study aims, 1) to identify key desirable characteristics of written patient feedback to doctors and/or students that focuses on patient-centeredness in consultations, and 2) to critically evaluate existing instruments to identify any suitable instrument for use for medical student teaching. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with the PTA program and explored the literature on patient-centeredness and patient feedback to identify desirable characteristics of written feedback for our program. A systematic search was conducted to identify existing patient feedback instruments. These were then evaluated in light of criteria based on desirable characteristics. RESULTS: Eight instruments met the inclusion criteria. While all were designed for patient use, none were ideal for the PTA program. The Doctors’ Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire (DISQ), while not used with medical students, is the closest fit to criteria. CONCLUSION: The lack of instruments specifically designed for written patient feedback to medical students highlights a gap in the current literature. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The DISQ provides a good basis for developing a new feedback instrument focused on patient-centeredness in medical students. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5327849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53278492017-03-03 Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations Hogan, Nicola Li, Henry Pezaro, Carmel Roberts, Noel Schmidt, Erica Martin, Jenepher Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research OBJECTIVE: The Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) program at Eastern Health Clinical School uses volunteer patients with chronic illnesses in consultation-based medical student education. The PTA program aims to develop students’ patient-centeredness and associated skills. Our study aims, 1) to identify key desirable characteristics of written patient feedback to doctors and/or students that focuses on patient-centeredness in consultations, and 2) to critically evaluate existing instruments to identify any suitable instrument for use for medical student teaching. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with the PTA program and explored the literature on patient-centeredness and patient feedback to identify desirable characteristics of written feedback for our program. A systematic search was conducted to identify existing patient feedback instruments. These were then evaluated in light of criteria based on desirable characteristics. RESULTS: Eight instruments met the inclusion criteria. While all were designed for patient use, none were ideal for the PTA program. The Doctors’ Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire (DISQ), while not used with medical students, is the closest fit to criteria. CONCLUSION: The lack of instruments specifically designed for written patient feedback to medical students highlights a gap in the current literature. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The DISQ provides a good basis for developing a new feedback instrument focused on patient-centeredness in medical students. Dove Medical Press 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5327849/ /pubmed/28260962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S119611 Text en © 2017 Hogan et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hogan, Nicola Li, Henry Pezaro, Carmel Roberts, Noel Schmidt, Erica Martin, Jenepher Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations |
title | Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations |
title_full | Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations |
title_fullStr | Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations |
title_full_unstemmed | Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations |
title_short | Searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations |
title_sort | searching for a written patient feedback instrument for patient–medical student consultations |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5327849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S119611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hogannicola searchingforawrittenpatientfeedbackinstrumentforpatientmedicalstudentconsultations AT lihenry searchingforawrittenpatientfeedbackinstrumentforpatientmedicalstudentconsultations AT pezarocarmel searchingforawrittenpatientfeedbackinstrumentforpatientmedicalstudentconsultations AT robertsnoel searchingforawrittenpatientfeedbackinstrumentforpatientmedicalstudentconsultations AT schmidterica searchingforawrittenpatientfeedbackinstrumentforpatientmedicalstudentconsultations AT martinjenepher searchingforawrittenpatientfeedbackinstrumentforpatientmedicalstudentconsultations |