Cargando…

Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda

BACKGROUND: In Sub-Saharan Africa, both under-treatment and over-treatment of malaria are common since illnesses are often diagnosed and treated on the basis of symptoms. We investigate whether malaria treatment rates among febrile individuals correspond to observed patterns of malaria infection by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saran, Indrani, Cohen, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171835
_version_ 1782510869252407296
author Saran, Indrani
Cohen, Jessica
author_facet Saran, Indrani
Cohen, Jessica
author_sort Saran, Indrani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Sub-Saharan Africa, both under-treatment and over-treatment of malaria are common since illnesses are often diagnosed and treated on the basis of symptoms. We investigate whether malaria treatment rates among febrile individuals correspond to observed patterns of malaria infection by age and by local prevalence. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We use data on treatment of febrile illnesses from a household survey that was conducted between March and May 2012 in 92 villages in six districts in Eastern Uganda. All household members were also tested for malaria using a rapid diagnostic test. We show that both the age of the febrile individual and the village prevalence rate are strongly associated with the odds that a febrile patient was infected with malaria, but not with the odds of ACT treatment. Compared to individuals who were aged 15 or above, febrile individuals aged 5–14 had 3.21 times the odds of testing positive for malaria (95% CI: [2.36 4.37], P<0·001), and febrile individuals who were under age 5 had 2.66 times the odds of testing positive for malaria (95% CI: [1.99 3.56], P<0·001). However, ACT treatment rates for febrile illnesses were not significantly higher for either children ages 5–14 (Unadjusted OR: 1.19, 95% CI: [0.88 1.62], P = 0.255) or children under the age of 5 (Unadjusted OR: 1.24, 95% CI: [0.92 1.68], P = 0·154). A one standard deviation increase in the village malaria prevalence rate was associated with a 2.03 times higher odds that a febrile individual under the age of five tested positive for malaria (95% CI: [1.63 2.54], p<0·001), but was not significantly associated with the odds of ACT treatment (Un-adjusted OR: 0.83, 95% CI: [0.66 1.05], P = 0·113). We present some evidence that this discrepancy may be because caregivers do not suspect a higher likelihood of malaria infection, conditional on fever, in young children or in high-prevalence villages. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that households have significant mis-perceptions about malaria likelihood that may contribute to the under-treatment of malaria. Policies are needed to encourage caregivers to seek immediate diagnostic testing and treatment for febrile illnesses, particularly among young children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5328248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53282482017-03-09 Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda Saran, Indrani Cohen, Jessica PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In Sub-Saharan Africa, both under-treatment and over-treatment of malaria are common since illnesses are often diagnosed and treated on the basis of symptoms. We investigate whether malaria treatment rates among febrile individuals correspond to observed patterns of malaria infection by age and by local prevalence. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We use data on treatment of febrile illnesses from a household survey that was conducted between March and May 2012 in 92 villages in six districts in Eastern Uganda. All household members were also tested for malaria using a rapid diagnostic test. We show that both the age of the febrile individual and the village prevalence rate are strongly associated with the odds that a febrile patient was infected with malaria, but not with the odds of ACT treatment. Compared to individuals who were aged 15 or above, febrile individuals aged 5–14 had 3.21 times the odds of testing positive for malaria (95% CI: [2.36 4.37], P<0·001), and febrile individuals who were under age 5 had 2.66 times the odds of testing positive for malaria (95% CI: [1.99 3.56], P<0·001). However, ACT treatment rates for febrile illnesses were not significantly higher for either children ages 5–14 (Unadjusted OR: 1.19, 95% CI: [0.88 1.62], P = 0.255) or children under the age of 5 (Unadjusted OR: 1.24, 95% CI: [0.92 1.68], P = 0·154). A one standard deviation increase in the village malaria prevalence rate was associated with a 2.03 times higher odds that a febrile individual under the age of five tested positive for malaria (95% CI: [1.63 2.54], p<0·001), but was not significantly associated with the odds of ACT treatment (Un-adjusted OR: 0.83, 95% CI: [0.66 1.05], P = 0·113). We present some evidence that this discrepancy may be because caregivers do not suspect a higher likelihood of malaria infection, conditional on fever, in young children or in high-prevalence villages. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that households have significant mis-perceptions about malaria likelihood that may contribute to the under-treatment of malaria. Policies are needed to encourage caregivers to seek immediate diagnostic testing and treatment for febrile illnesses, particularly among young children. Public Library of Science 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5328248/ /pubmed/28241041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171835 Text en © 2017 Saran, Cohen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saran, Indrani
Cohen, Jessica
Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda
title Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda
title_full Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda
title_fullStr Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda
title_short Disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: Evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in Uganda
title_sort disparities between malaria infection and treatment rates: evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of households in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171835
work_keys_str_mv AT saranindrani disparitiesbetweenmalariainfectionandtreatmentratesevidencefromacrosssectionalanalysisofhouseholdsinuganda
AT cohenjessica disparitiesbetweenmalariainfectionandtreatmentratesevidencefromacrosssectionalanalysisofhouseholdsinuganda