Cargando…
Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits
Conservation scientists increasingly recognize that incorporating human values into conservation planning increases the chances for success by garnering broader project acceptance. However, methods for defining quantitative targets for the spatial representation of human well-being priorities are le...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172458 |
_version_ | 1782510874123042816 |
---|---|
author | Annis, Gust M. Pearsall, Douglas R. Kahl, Katherine J. Washburn, Erika L. May, Christopher A. Franks Taylor, Rachael Cole, James B. Ewert, David N. Game, Edward T. Doran, Patrick J. |
author_facet | Annis, Gust M. Pearsall, Douglas R. Kahl, Katherine J. Washburn, Erika L. May, Christopher A. Franks Taylor, Rachael Cole, James B. Ewert, David N. Game, Edward T. Doran, Patrick J. |
author_sort | Annis, Gust M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conservation scientists increasingly recognize that incorporating human values into conservation planning increases the chances for success by garnering broader project acceptance. However, methods for defining quantitative targets for the spatial representation of human well-being priorities are less developed. In this study we employ an approach for identifying regionally important human values and establishing specific spatial targets for their representation based on stakeholder outreach. Our primary objective was to develop a spatially-explicit conservation plan that identifies the most efficient locations for conservation actions to meet ecological goals while sustaining or enhancing human well-being values within the coastal and nearshore areas of the western Lake Erie basin (WLEB). We conducted an optimization analysis using 26 features representing ecological and human well-being priorities (13 of each), and included seven cost layers. The influence that including human well-being had on project results was tested by running five scenarios and setting targets for human well-being at different levels in each scenario. The most important areas for conservation to achieve multiple goals are clustered along the coast, reflecting a concentration of existing or potentially restorable coastal wetlands, coastal landbird stopover habitat and terrestrial biodiversity, as well as important recreational activities. Inland important areas tended to cluster around trails and high quality inland landbird stopover habitat. Most concentrated areas of importance also are centered on lands that are already conserved, reflecting the lower costs and higher benefits of enlarging these conserved areas rather than conserving isolated, dispersed areas. Including human well-being features in the analysis only influenced the solution at the highest target levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5328270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53282702017-03-09 Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits Annis, Gust M. Pearsall, Douglas R. Kahl, Katherine J. Washburn, Erika L. May, Christopher A. Franks Taylor, Rachael Cole, James B. Ewert, David N. Game, Edward T. Doran, Patrick J. PLoS One Research Article Conservation scientists increasingly recognize that incorporating human values into conservation planning increases the chances for success by garnering broader project acceptance. However, methods for defining quantitative targets for the spatial representation of human well-being priorities are less developed. In this study we employ an approach for identifying regionally important human values and establishing specific spatial targets for their representation based on stakeholder outreach. Our primary objective was to develop a spatially-explicit conservation plan that identifies the most efficient locations for conservation actions to meet ecological goals while sustaining or enhancing human well-being values within the coastal and nearshore areas of the western Lake Erie basin (WLEB). We conducted an optimization analysis using 26 features representing ecological and human well-being priorities (13 of each), and included seven cost layers. The influence that including human well-being had on project results was tested by running five scenarios and setting targets for human well-being at different levels in each scenario. The most important areas for conservation to achieve multiple goals are clustered along the coast, reflecting a concentration of existing or potentially restorable coastal wetlands, coastal landbird stopover habitat and terrestrial biodiversity, as well as important recreational activities. Inland important areas tended to cluster around trails and high quality inland landbird stopover habitat. Most concentrated areas of importance also are centered on lands that are already conserved, reflecting the lower costs and higher benefits of enlarging these conserved areas rather than conserving isolated, dispersed areas. Including human well-being features in the analysis only influenced the solution at the highest target levels. Public Library of Science 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5328270/ /pubmed/28241018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172458 Text en © 2017 Annis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Annis, Gust M. Pearsall, Douglas R. Kahl, Katherine J. Washburn, Erika L. May, Christopher A. Franks Taylor, Rachael Cole, James B. Ewert, David N. Game, Edward T. Doran, Patrick J. Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits |
title | Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits |
title_full | Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits |
title_fullStr | Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits |
title_full_unstemmed | Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits |
title_short | Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits |
title_sort | designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172458 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT annisgustm designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT pearsalldouglasr designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT kahlkatherinej designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT washburnerikal designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT maychristophera designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT frankstaylorrachael designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT colejamesb designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT ewertdavidn designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT gameedwardt designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits AT doranpatrickj designingcoastalconservationtodeliverecosystemandhumanwellbeingbenefits |