Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline plus background drug regimens (BR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in Italy. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to the Italian setting to estimate the incremental cost-eff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1283105 |
_version_ | 1782510886458490880 |
---|---|
author | Codecasa, Luigi R. Toumi, Mondher D’Ausilio, Anna Aiello, Andrea Damele, Francesco Termini, Roberta Uglietti, Alessia Hettle, Robert Graziano, Giorgio De Lorenzo, Saverio |
author_facet | Codecasa, Luigi R. Toumi, Mondher D’Ausilio, Anna Aiello, Andrea Damele, Francesco Termini, Roberta Uglietti, Alessia Hettle, Robert Graziano, Giorgio De Lorenzo, Saverio |
author_sort | Codecasa, Luigi R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline plus background drug regimens (BR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in Italy. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to the Italian setting to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of bedaquiline plus BR (BBR) versus BR in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB over 10 years, from both the National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in terms of life-years gained (LYG). Clinical data were sourced from trials; resource consumption for compared treatments was modelled according to advice from an expert clinicians panel. NHS tariffs for inpatient and outpatient resource consumption were retrieved from published Italian sources. Drug costs were provided by reference centres for disease treatment in Italy. A 3% annual discount was applied to both cost and effectiveness. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Over 10 years, BBR vs. BR alone is cost-effective, with ICERs of €16,639/LYG and €4081/LYG for the NHS and society, respectively. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results from both considered perspectives. Conclusion: In Italy, BBR vs. BR alone has proven to be cost-effective in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB under a range of scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5328329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53283292017-03-06 Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy Codecasa, Luigi R. Toumi, Mondher D’Ausilio, Anna Aiello, Andrea Damele, Francesco Termini, Roberta Uglietti, Alessia Hettle, Robert Graziano, Giorgio De Lorenzo, Saverio J Mark Access Health Policy Original Research Article Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline plus background drug regimens (BR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in Italy. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to the Italian setting to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of bedaquiline plus BR (BBR) versus BR in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB over 10 years, from both the National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in terms of life-years gained (LYG). Clinical data were sourced from trials; resource consumption for compared treatments was modelled according to advice from an expert clinicians panel. NHS tariffs for inpatient and outpatient resource consumption were retrieved from published Italian sources. Drug costs were provided by reference centres for disease treatment in Italy. A 3% annual discount was applied to both cost and effectiveness. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Over 10 years, BBR vs. BR alone is cost-effective, with ICERs of €16,639/LYG and €4081/LYG for the NHS and society, respectively. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results from both considered perspectives. Conclusion: In Italy, BBR vs. BR alone has proven to be cost-effective in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB under a range of scenarios. Routledge 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5328329/ /pubmed/28265350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1283105 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Codecasa, Luigi R. Toumi, Mondher D’Ausilio, Anna Aiello, Andrea Damele, Francesco Termini, Roberta Uglietti, Alessia Hettle, Robert Graziano, Giorgio De Lorenzo, Saverio Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy |
title | Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in mdr and xdr tuberculosis in italy |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1283105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT codecasaluigir costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT toumimondher costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT dausilioanna costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT aielloandrea costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT damelefrancesco costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT terminiroberta costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT ugliettialessia costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT hettlerobert costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT grazianogiorgio costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly AT delorenzosaverio costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly |