Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline plus background drug regimens (BR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in Italy. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to the Italian setting to estimate the incremental cost-eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Codecasa, Luigi R., Toumi, Mondher, D’Ausilio, Anna, Aiello, Andrea, Damele, Francesco, Termini, Roberta, Uglietti, Alessia, Hettle, Robert, Graziano, Giorgio, De Lorenzo, Saverio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1283105
_version_ 1782510886458490880
author Codecasa, Luigi R.
Toumi, Mondher
D’Ausilio, Anna
Aiello, Andrea
Damele, Francesco
Termini, Roberta
Uglietti, Alessia
Hettle, Robert
Graziano, Giorgio
De Lorenzo, Saverio
author_facet Codecasa, Luigi R.
Toumi, Mondher
D’Ausilio, Anna
Aiello, Andrea
Damele, Francesco
Termini, Roberta
Uglietti, Alessia
Hettle, Robert
Graziano, Giorgio
De Lorenzo, Saverio
author_sort Codecasa, Luigi R.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline plus background drug regimens (BR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in Italy. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to the Italian setting to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of bedaquiline plus BR (BBR) versus BR in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB over 10 years, from both the National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in terms of life-years gained (LYG). Clinical data were sourced from trials; resource consumption for compared treatments was modelled according to advice from an expert clinicians panel. NHS tariffs for inpatient and outpatient resource consumption were retrieved from published Italian sources. Drug costs were provided by reference centres for disease treatment in Italy. A 3% annual discount was applied to both cost and effectiveness. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Over 10 years, BBR vs. BR alone is cost-effective, with ICERs of €16,639/LYG and €4081/LYG for the NHS and society, respectively. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results from both considered perspectives. Conclusion: In Italy, BBR vs. BR alone has proven to be cost-effective in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB under a range of scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5328329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53283292017-03-06 Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy Codecasa, Luigi R. Toumi, Mondher D’Ausilio, Anna Aiello, Andrea Damele, Francesco Termini, Roberta Uglietti, Alessia Hettle, Robert Graziano, Giorgio De Lorenzo, Saverio J Mark Access Health Policy Original Research Article Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline plus background drug regimens (BR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in Italy. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to the Italian setting to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of bedaquiline plus BR (BBR) versus BR in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB over 10 years, from both the National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in terms of life-years gained (LYG). Clinical data were sourced from trials; resource consumption for compared treatments was modelled according to advice from an expert clinicians panel. NHS tariffs for inpatient and outpatient resource consumption were retrieved from published Italian sources. Drug costs were provided by reference centres for disease treatment in Italy. A 3% annual discount was applied to both cost and effectiveness. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Over 10 years, BBR vs. BR alone is cost-effective, with ICERs of €16,639/LYG and €4081/LYG for the NHS and society, respectively. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results from both considered perspectives. Conclusion: In Italy, BBR vs. BR alone has proven to be cost-effective in the treatment of MDR-TB and XDR-TB under a range of scenarios. Routledge 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5328329/ /pubmed/28265350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1283105 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Codecasa, Luigi R.
Toumi, Mondher
D’Ausilio, Anna
Aiello, Andrea
Damele, Francesco
Termini, Roberta
Uglietti, Alessia
Hettle, Robert
Graziano, Giorgio
De Lorenzo, Saverio
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy
title Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy
title_full Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy
title_short Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Italy
title_sort cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline in mdr and xdr tuberculosis in italy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1283105
work_keys_str_mv AT codecasaluigir costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT toumimondher costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT dausilioanna costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT aielloandrea costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT damelefrancesco costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT terminiroberta costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT ugliettialessia costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT hettlerobert costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT grazianogiorgio costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly
AT delorenzosaverio costeffectivenessofbedaquilineinmdrandxdrtuberculosisinitaly