Cargando…

Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment

Urinary extracellular vesicles (UEVs) appear an ideal source of biomarkers for kidney and urogenital diseases. The majority of protocols designed for their isolation are based on differential centrifugation steps. However, little is still known of the type and amount of vesicles left in the supernat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musante, Luca, Tataruch-Weinert, Dorota, Kerjaschki, Dontscho, Henry, Michael, Meleady, Paula, Holthofer, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2016.1267896
_version_ 1782510890802741248
author Musante, Luca
Tataruch-Weinert, Dorota
Kerjaschki, Dontscho
Henry, Michael
Meleady, Paula
Holthofer, Harry
author_facet Musante, Luca
Tataruch-Weinert, Dorota
Kerjaschki, Dontscho
Henry, Michael
Meleady, Paula
Holthofer, Harry
author_sort Musante, Luca
collection PubMed
description Urinary extracellular vesicles (UEVs) appear an ideal source of biomarkers for kidney and urogenital diseases. The majority of protocols designed for their isolation are based on differential centrifugation steps. However, little is still known of the type and amount of vesicles left in the supernatant. Here we used an isolation protocol for UEVs which uses hydrostatic filtration dialysis as first pre-enrichment step, followed by differential centrifugation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), mass spectrometry (MS), western blot, ELISA assays and tuneable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) were used to characterise and quantify UEVs in the ultracentrifugation supernatant. TEM showed the presence of a variety of small size vesicles in the supernatant while protein identification by MS matched accurately with the protein list available in Vesiclepedia. Screening and relative quantification for specific vesicle markers showed that the supernatant was preferentially positive for CD9 and TSG101. ELISA tests for quantification of exosome revealed that 14%, was left in the supernatant with a particle diameter of 110 nm and concentration of 1.54 × 10(10)/ml. Here we show a comprehensive characterisation of exosomes and other small size urinary vesicles which the conventional differential centrifugation protocol may lose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5328348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53283482017-03-06 Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment Musante, Luca Tataruch-Weinert, Dorota Kerjaschki, Dontscho Henry, Michael Meleady, Paula Holthofer, Harry J Extracell Vesicles Original Articles Urinary extracellular vesicles (UEVs) appear an ideal source of biomarkers for kidney and urogenital diseases. The majority of protocols designed for their isolation are based on differential centrifugation steps. However, little is still known of the type and amount of vesicles left in the supernatant. Here we used an isolation protocol for UEVs which uses hydrostatic filtration dialysis as first pre-enrichment step, followed by differential centrifugation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), mass spectrometry (MS), western blot, ELISA assays and tuneable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) were used to characterise and quantify UEVs in the ultracentrifugation supernatant. TEM showed the presence of a variety of small size vesicles in the supernatant while protein identification by MS matched accurately with the protein list available in Vesiclepedia. Screening and relative quantification for specific vesicle markers showed that the supernatant was preferentially positive for CD9 and TSG101. ELISA tests for quantification of exosome revealed that 14%, was left in the supernatant with a particle diameter of 110 nm and concentration of 1.54 × 10(10)/ml. Here we show a comprehensive characterisation of exosomes and other small size urinary vesicles which the conventional differential centrifugation protocol may lose. Taylor & Francis 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5328348/ /pubmed/28326167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2016.1267896 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Musante, Luca
Tataruch-Weinert, Dorota
Kerjaschki, Dontscho
Henry, Michael
Meleady, Paula
Holthofer, Harry
Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment
title Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment
title_full Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment
title_fullStr Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment
title_full_unstemmed Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment
title_short Residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment
title_sort residual urinary extracellular vesicles in ultracentrifugation supernatants after hydrostatic filtration dialysis enrichment
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2016.1267896
work_keys_str_mv AT musanteluca residualurinaryextracellularvesiclesinultracentrifugationsupernatantsafterhydrostaticfiltrationdialysisenrichment
AT tataruchweinertdorota residualurinaryextracellularvesiclesinultracentrifugationsupernatantsafterhydrostaticfiltrationdialysisenrichment
AT kerjaschkidontscho residualurinaryextracellularvesiclesinultracentrifugationsupernatantsafterhydrostaticfiltrationdialysisenrichment
AT henrymichael residualurinaryextracellularvesiclesinultracentrifugationsupernatantsafterhydrostaticfiltrationdialysisenrichment
AT meleadypaula residualurinaryextracellularvesiclesinultracentrifugationsupernatantsafterhydrostaticfiltrationdialysisenrichment
AT holthoferharry residualurinaryextracellularvesiclesinultracentrifugationsupernatantsafterhydrostaticfiltrationdialysisenrichment