Cargando…
Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production
Collecting duct (CD) endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) is an autocrine inhibitor of Na(+) and water reabsorption. Salt or water loading increases CD ET‐1 production; this is likely due, at least in part, to increased tubule fluid flow. The mechanisms by which flow stimulates CD ET‐1 production are incompletely un...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242818 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13126 |
_version_ | 1782510938696450048 |
---|---|
author | Ramkumar, Nirupama Gao, Yang Kohan, Donald E. |
author_facet | Ramkumar, Nirupama Gao, Yang Kohan, Donald E. |
author_sort | Ramkumar, Nirupama |
collection | PubMed |
description | Collecting duct (CD) endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) is an autocrine inhibitor of Na(+) and water reabsorption. Salt or water loading increases CD ET‐1 production; this is likely due, at least in part, to increased tubule fluid flow. The mechanisms by which flow stimulates CD ET‐1 production are incompletely understood. In particular, flow induction of cortical CD (CCD) and inner medullary CD (IMCD) ET‐1 synthesis may occur via different mechanisms. Since flow‐mediated ET‐1 production in IMCD has been more extensively characterized than in the CCD, this study was undertaken to further examine putative signaling pathways involved in flow‐stimulated CCD ET‐1 production. The CD cell line, mpkCCDcl4, was exposed to static or flow (2 dyne/cm(2) for 2 h) conditions and ET‐1/GAPDH mRNA levels were assessed. Intracellular Ca(2+), Ca(2+)‐stimulated Ca(2+) release, calcineurin, and protein kinase c α/β isoforms were all involved in the ET‐1 flow response. TRPC6, but not other CD‐expressed TRP channels (TRPC3, 4, and 5, or TRPV4) played a role in the ET‐1 flow response. Purinergic signaling pathways and cilia were not involved in the ET‐1 flow response. Based on these and previously published findings, we present a comparison of flow‐stimulated CD ET‐1 production between CCD and IMCD. We suggest that flow‐stimulated CCD ET‐1 production may be more involved in responding to Na(+) delivery, while IMCD ET‐1 production may be more responsive to water and solute delivery; the responsible pathways for mediating these effects in the two regions of the CD appear to be substantially distinct from one another. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5328769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53287692017-03-03 Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production Ramkumar, Nirupama Gao, Yang Kohan, Donald E. Physiol Rep Original Research Collecting duct (CD) endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) is an autocrine inhibitor of Na(+) and water reabsorption. Salt or water loading increases CD ET‐1 production; this is likely due, at least in part, to increased tubule fluid flow. The mechanisms by which flow stimulates CD ET‐1 production are incompletely understood. In particular, flow induction of cortical CD (CCD) and inner medullary CD (IMCD) ET‐1 synthesis may occur via different mechanisms. Since flow‐mediated ET‐1 production in IMCD has been more extensively characterized than in the CCD, this study was undertaken to further examine putative signaling pathways involved in flow‐stimulated CCD ET‐1 production. The CD cell line, mpkCCDcl4, was exposed to static or flow (2 dyne/cm(2) for 2 h) conditions and ET‐1/GAPDH mRNA levels were assessed. Intracellular Ca(2+), Ca(2+)‐stimulated Ca(2+) release, calcineurin, and protein kinase c α/β isoforms were all involved in the ET‐1 flow response. TRPC6, but not other CD‐expressed TRP channels (TRPC3, 4, and 5, or TRPV4) played a role in the ET‐1 flow response. Purinergic signaling pathways and cilia were not involved in the ET‐1 flow response. Based on these and previously published findings, we present a comparison of flow‐stimulated CD ET‐1 production between CCD and IMCD. We suggest that flow‐stimulated CCD ET‐1 production may be more involved in responding to Na(+) delivery, while IMCD ET‐1 production may be more responsive to water and solute delivery; the responsible pathways for mediating these effects in the two regions of the CD appear to be substantially distinct from one another. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5328769/ /pubmed/28242818 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13126 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ramkumar, Nirupama Gao, Yang Kohan, Donald E. Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production |
title | Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production |
title_full | Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production |
title_fullStr | Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production |
title_short | Characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production |
title_sort | characterization of flow‐regulated cortical collecting duct endothelin‐1 production |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5328769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242818 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramkumarnirupama characterizationofflowregulatedcorticalcollectingductendothelin1production AT gaoyang characterizationofflowregulatedcorticalcollectingductendothelin1production AT kohandonalde characterizationofflowregulatedcorticalcollectingductendothelin1production |