Cargando…

Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task?

Arousal involves a physiological and psychological state of being awake or reactive to stimuli. It could be treated also as an energetic property of stimulation. On the basis of previous findings concerning affective state modulation of spatial processing, I predict that arousal impact will follow t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Imbir, Kamil K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9396-9
_version_ 1782510991671558144
author Imbir, Kamil K.
author_facet Imbir, Kamil K.
author_sort Imbir, Kamil K.
collection PubMed
description Arousal involves a physiological and psychological state of being awake or reactive to stimuli. It could be treated also as an energetic property of stimulation. On the basis of previous findings concerning affective state modulation of spatial processing, I predict that arousal impact will follow the Yerkes-Dodson law. To test this hypothesis, 135 words were chosen and divided into three levels of arousal (low, medium and high), whilst controlling for valence, concreteness, frequency of appearance and length. Forty-nine individuals performed a flanker task while reading the words in order to provide a measure of interference control over spatial processing. The accuracy of answers, reaction times and interference effect index were analyzed. It appears that, at the medium arousal level of words, arousal was optimal for interference control, while both low and high arousal impaired the cognitive control of interference caused by competing flanker and target stimuli features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5329098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53290982017-03-13 Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task? Imbir, Kamil K. Curr Psychol Article Arousal involves a physiological and psychological state of being awake or reactive to stimuli. It could be treated also as an energetic property of stimulation. On the basis of previous findings concerning affective state modulation of spatial processing, I predict that arousal impact will follow the Yerkes-Dodson law. To test this hypothesis, 135 words were chosen and divided into three levels of arousal (low, medium and high), whilst controlling for valence, concreteness, frequency of appearance and length. Forty-nine individuals performed a flanker task while reading the words in order to provide a measure of interference control over spatial processing. The accuracy of answers, reaction times and interference effect index were analyzed. It appears that, at the medium arousal level of words, arousal was optimal for interference control, while both low and high arousal impaired the cognitive control of interference caused by competing flanker and target stimuli features. Springer US 2015-12-11 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5329098/ /pubmed/28298876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9396-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Imbir, Kamil K.
Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task?
title Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task?
title_full Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task?
title_fullStr Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task?
title_full_unstemmed Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task?
title_short Does Reading Words Differing in Arousal Load Influence Interference Control in Flanker Task?
title_sort does reading words differing in arousal load influence interference control in flanker task?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9396-9
work_keys_str_mv AT imbirkamilk doesreadingwordsdifferinginarousalloadinfluenceinterferencecontrolinflankertask