Cargando…
Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
BACKGROUND: Early detection of high-risk population for osteoporosis is the key to preventing this disease. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study a continuous sample of 270 women and 89 men (age: 20–90 years) was divided into four groups by age (≤ 55 or > 55 years) and sex. Participants comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter Open
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0036 |
_version_ | 1782511133711663104 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hong-Mei Liu, Hui-Ling Wang, Xuan Chen, Wei Chen, Dan Zhang, Zhong-Zhi Wang, Han-Ming |
author_facet | Zhang, Hong-Mei Liu, Hui-Ling Wang, Xuan Chen, Wei Chen, Dan Zhang, Zhong-Zhi Wang, Han-Ming |
author_sort | Zhang, Hong-Mei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early detection of high-risk population for osteoporosis is the key to preventing this disease. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study a continuous sample of 270 women and 89 men (age: 20–90 years) was divided into four groups by age (≤ 55 or > 55 years) and sex. Participants completed the IOF test. Low-, medium-, and high-risk grades were defined by an OSTA index of greater than -1, -1 to -4, and less than -4, respectively. RESULTS: Most participants were categorized in the low-risk group (240 people, 66.9%), followed by the medium-risk (102 people, 28.4%) and high-risk groups (17 people, 4.7%). Compared to women, men in both age groups had significantly higher OSTA index and greater numbers of positive answers on the IOF test. 64.3% individuals were susceptible to osteoporosis risk (≥1 positive answers on the IOF test). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that family history of fragility fracture (OR: 0.503, 95% CI: 0.26–0.97), height loss exceeding 3 cm (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.55–4.05), and earlier menopause (OR: 0.434, 95% CI: 0.19–0.97) were associated with higher risk grades. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of the OSTA and IOF test is a simple and effective method for assessing the risk of osteoporosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5329823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | De Gruyter Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53298232017-03-28 Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese Zhang, Hong-Mei Liu, Hui-Ling Wang, Xuan Chen, Wei Chen, Dan Zhang, Zhong-Zhi Wang, Han-Ming Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: Early detection of high-risk population for osteoporosis is the key to preventing this disease. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study a continuous sample of 270 women and 89 men (age: 20–90 years) was divided into four groups by age (≤ 55 or > 55 years) and sex. Participants completed the IOF test. Low-, medium-, and high-risk grades were defined by an OSTA index of greater than -1, -1 to -4, and less than -4, respectively. RESULTS: Most participants were categorized in the low-risk group (240 people, 66.9%), followed by the medium-risk (102 people, 28.4%) and high-risk groups (17 people, 4.7%). Compared to women, men in both age groups had significantly higher OSTA index and greater numbers of positive answers on the IOF test. 64.3% individuals were susceptible to osteoporosis risk (≥1 positive answers on the IOF test). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that family history of fragility fracture (OR: 0.503, 95% CI: 0.26–0.97), height loss exceeding 3 cm (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.55–4.05), and earlier menopause (OR: 0.434, 95% CI: 0.19–0.97) were associated with higher risk grades. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of the OSTA and IOF test is a simple and effective method for assessing the risk of osteoporosis. De Gruyter Open 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5329823/ /pubmed/28352792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0036 Text en © 2016 Hong-Mei Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Hong-Mei Liu, Hui-Ling Wang, Xuan Chen, Wei Chen, Dan Zhang, Zhong-Zhi Wang, Han-Ming Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese |
title | Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese |
title_full | Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese |
title_fullStr | Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese |
title_short | Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese |
title_sort | clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in chinese |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghongmei clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese AT liuhuiling clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese AT wangxuan clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese AT chenwei clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese AT chendan clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese AT zhangzhongzhi clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese AT wanghanming clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese |