Cargando…

Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese

BACKGROUND: Early detection of high-risk population for osteoporosis is the key to preventing this disease. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study a continuous sample of 270 women and 89 men (age: 20–90 years) was divided into four groups by age (≤ 55 or > 55 years) and sex. Participants comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hong-Mei, Liu, Hui-Ling, Wang, Xuan, Chen, Wei, Chen, Dan, Zhang, Zhong-Zhi, Wang, Han-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0036
_version_ 1782511133711663104
author Zhang, Hong-Mei
Liu, Hui-Ling
Wang, Xuan
Chen, Wei
Chen, Dan
Zhang, Zhong-Zhi
Wang, Han-Ming
author_facet Zhang, Hong-Mei
Liu, Hui-Ling
Wang, Xuan
Chen, Wei
Chen, Dan
Zhang, Zhong-Zhi
Wang, Han-Ming
author_sort Zhang, Hong-Mei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early detection of high-risk population for osteoporosis is the key to preventing this disease. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study a continuous sample of 270 women and 89 men (age: 20–90 years) was divided into four groups by age (≤ 55 or > 55 years) and sex. Participants completed the IOF test. Low-, medium-, and high-risk grades were defined by an OSTA index of greater than -1, -1 to -4, and less than -4, respectively. RESULTS: Most participants were categorized in the low-risk group (240 people, 66.9%), followed by the medium-risk (102 people, 28.4%) and high-risk groups (17 people, 4.7%). Compared to women, men in both age groups had significantly higher OSTA index and greater numbers of positive answers on the IOF test. 64.3% individuals were susceptible to osteoporosis risk (≥1 positive answers on the IOF test). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that family history of fragility fracture (OR: 0.503, 95% CI: 0.26–0.97), height loss exceeding 3 cm (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.55–4.05), and earlier menopause (OR: 0.434, 95% CI: 0.19–0.97) were associated with higher risk grades. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of the OSTA and IOF test is a simple and effective method for assessing the risk of osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5329823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53298232017-03-28 Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese Zhang, Hong-Mei Liu, Hui-Ling Wang, Xuan Chen, Wei Chen, Dan Zhang, Zhong-Zhi Wang, Han-Ming Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: Early detection of high-risk population for osteoporosis is the key to preventing this disease. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study a continuous sample of 270 women and 89 men (age: 20–90 years) was divided into four groups by age (≤ 55 or > 55 years) and sex. Participants completed the IOF test. Low-, medium-, and high-risk grades were defined by an OSTA index of greater than -1, -1 to -4, and less than -4, respectively. RESULTS: Most participants were categorized in the low-risk group (240 people, 66.9%), followed by the medium-risk (102 people, 28.4%) and high-risk groups (17 people, 4.7%). Compared to women, men in both age groups had significantly higher OSTA index and greater numbers of positive answers on the IOF test. 64.3% individuals were susceptible to osteoporosis risk (≥1 positive answers on the IOF test). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that family history of fragility fracture (OR: 0.503, 95% CI: 0.26–0.97), height loss exceeding 3 cm (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.55–4.05), and earlier menopause (OR: 0.434, 95% CI: 0.19–0.97) were associated with higher risk grades. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of the OSTA and IOF test is a simple and effective method for assessing the risk of osteoporosis. De Gruyter Open 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5329823/ /pubmed/28352792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0036 Text en © 2016 Hong-Mei Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Hong-Mei
Liu, Hui-Ling
Wang, Xuan
Chen, Wei
Chen, Dan
Zhang, Zhong-Zhi
Wang, Han-Ming
Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
title Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
title_full Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
title_fullStr Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
title_full_unstemmed Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
title_short Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
title_sort clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in chinese
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0036
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghongmei clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese
AT liuhuiling clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese
AT wangxuan clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese
AT chenwei clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese
AT chendan clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese
AT zhangzhongzhi clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese
AT wanghanming clinicalvalueofselfassessmentriskofosteoporosisinchinese