Cargando…

Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies

BACKGROUND: The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6–8 weeks post event as part of the “return to duty” process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ketko, Itay, Druyan, Amit, Yanovich, Ran, Epstein, Yoram, Heled, Yuval
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3
_version_ 1782511153801330688
author Ketko, Itay
Druyan, Amit
Yanovich, Ran
Epstein, Yoram
Heled, Yuval
author_facet Ketko, Itay
Druyan, Amit
Yanovich, Ran
Epstein, Yoram
Heled, Yuval
author_sort Ketko, Itay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6–8 weeks post event as part of the “return to duty” process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in some cases however, the thermoregulatory recovery may be longer (several months), and therefore a second heat tolerance test is scheduled 6-8 weeks later. The presented case reports emphasize the possibility of different recovery periods of the thermoregulatory center and the distinction between congenital and acquired physiological heat intolerance. CASE DESCRIPTION: Two young healthy males (A and B) were diagnosed with exertional heat related injury during a pre-recruitment sorting process. Both underwent a heat tolerance test, and were found heat intolerant. During the next months they repeated the test several times. Patient A was finally diagnosed as heat tolerant and patient B was diagnosed as heat intolerant. CONCLUSION: Susceptibility to heat is a significant determinant for active young people such as athletes and soldiers. Both cases emphasize the importance of the heat tolerance test (and repeated test when needed) as a criteria for an exertional heat related injury patient to return to duty/play and to perform intense physical activities. These cases also emphasize the effectiveness and sensitivity of the test in identifying a temporary and a permanent state of heat intolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5329924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53299242017-03-06 Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies Ketko, Itay Druyan, Amit Yanovich, Ran Epstein, Yoram Heled, Yuval Disaster Mil Med Case Report BACKGROUND: The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6–8 weeks post event as part of the “return to duty” process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in some cases however, the thermoregulatory recovery may be longer (several months), and therefore a second heat tolerance test is scheduled 6-8 weeks later. The presented case reports emphasize the possibility of different recovery periods of the thermoregulatory center and the distinction between congenital and acquired physiological heat intolerance. CASE DESCRIPTION: Two young healthy males (A and B) were diagnosed with exertional heat related injury during a pre-recruitment sorting process. Both underwent a heat tolerance test, and were found heat intolerant. During the next months they repeated the test several times. Patient A was finally diagnosed as heat tolerant and patient B was diagnosed as heat intolerant. CONCLUSION: Susceptibility to heat is a significant determinant for active young people such as athletes and soldiers. Both cases emphasize the importance of the heat tolerance test (and repeated test when needed) as a criteria for an exertional heat related injury patient to return to duty/play and to perform intense physical activities. These cases also emphasize the effectiveness and sensitivity of the test in identifying a temporary and a permanent state of heat intolerance. BioMed Central 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5329924/ /pubmed/28265433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3 Text en © Ketko et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Ketko, Itay
Druyan, Amit
Yanovich, Ran
Epstein, Yoram
Heled, Yuval
Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies
title Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies
title_full Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies
title_fullStr Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies
title_full_unstemmed Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies
title_short Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies
title_sort return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? a lesson from two case studies
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ketkoitay returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies
AT druyanamit returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies
AT yanovichran returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies
AT epsteinyoram returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies
AT heledyuval returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies