Cargando…
Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies
BACKGROUND: The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6–8 weeks post event as part of the “return to duty” process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3 |
_version_ | 1782511153801330688 |
---|---|
author | Ketko, Itay Druyan, Amit Yanovich, Ran Epstein, Yoram Heled, Yuval |
author_facet | Ketko, Itay Druyan, Amit Yanovich, Ran Epstein, Yoram Heled, Yuval |
author_sort | Ketko, Itay |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6–8 weeks post event as part of the “return to duty” process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in some cases however, the thermoregulatory recovery may be longer (several months), and therefore a second heat tolerance test is scheduled 6-8 weeks later. The presented case reports emphasize the possibility of different recovery periods of the thermoregulatory center and the distinction between congenital and acquired physiological heat intolerance. CASE DESCRIPTION: Two young healthy males (A and B) were diagnosed with exertional heat related injury during a pre-recruitment sorting process. Both underwent a heat tolerance test, and were found heat intolerant. During the next months they repeated the test several times. Patient A was finally diagnosed as heat tolerant and patient B was diagnosed as heat intolerant. CONCLUSION: Susceptibility to heat is a significant determinant for active young people such as athletes and soldiers. Both cases emphasize the importance of the heat tolerance test (and repeated test when needed) as a criteria for an exertional heat related injury patient to return to duty/play and to perform intense physical activities. These cases also emphasize the effectiveness and sensitivity of the test in identifying a temporary and a permanent state of heat intolerance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5329924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53299242017-03-06 Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies Ketko, Itay Druyan, Amit Yanovich, Ran Epstein, Yoram Heled, Yuval Disaster Mil Med Case Report BACKGROUND: The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6–8 weeks post event as part of the “return to duty” process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in some cases however, the thermoregulatory recovery may be longer (several months), and therefore a second heat tolerance test is scheduled 6-8 weeks later. The presented case reports emphasize the possibility of different recovery periods of the thermoregulatory center and the distinction between congenital and acquired physiological heat intolerance. CASE DESCRIPTION: Two young healthy males (A and B) were diagnosed with exertional heat related injury during a pre-recruitment sorting process. Both underwent a heat tolerance test, and were found heat intolerant. During the next months they repeated the test several times. Patient A was finally diagnosed as heat tolerant and patient B was diagnosed as heat intolerant. CONCLUSION: Susceptibility to heat is a significant determinant for active young people such as athletes and soldiers. Both cases emphasize the importance of the heat tolerance test (and repeated test when needed) as a criteria for an exertional heat related injury patient to return to duty/play and to perform intense physical activities. These cases also emphasize the effectiveness and sensitivity of the test in identifying a temporary and a permanent state of heat intolerance. BioMed Central 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5329924/ /pubmed/28265433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3 Text en © Ketko et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Ketko, Itay Druyan, Amit Yanovich, Ran Epstein, Yoram Heled, Yuval Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies |
title | Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies |
title_full | Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies |
title_fullStr | Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies |
title_short | Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies |
title_sort | return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? a lesson from two case studies |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5329924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ketkoitay returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies AT druyanamit returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies AT yanovichran returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies AT epsteinyoram returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies AT heledyuval returntodutyplayafterexertionalheatinjurydowehavealltheanswersalessonfromtwocasestudies |