Cargando…

Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain affects nursing home residents’ daily life. Pain assessment is central to adequate pain management. The overall aim was to investigate effects of a pain management intervention on nursing homes residents and to describe staffs’ experiences of the intervention. METHODS: A clu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamhidir, Anna-Greta, Sjölund, Britt-Marie, Fläckman, Birgitta, Wimo, Anders, Sköldunger, Anders, Engström, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0454-z
_version_ 1782511174912311296
author Mamhidir, Anna-Greta
Sjölund, Britt-Marie
Fläckman, Birgitta
Wimo, Anders
Sköldunger, Anders
Engström, Maria
author_facet Mamhidir, Anna-Greta
Sjölund, Britt-Marie
Fläckman, Birgitta
Wimo, Anders
Sköldunger, Anders
Engström, Maria
author_sort Mamhidir, Anna-Greta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pain affects nursing home residents’ daily life. Pain assessment is central to adequate pain management. The overall aim was to investigate effects of a pain management intervention on nursing homes residents and to describe staffs’ experiences of the intervention. METHODS: A cluster-randomized trial and a mixed-methods approach. Randomized nursing home assignment to intervention or comparison group. The intervention group after theoretical and practical training sessions, performed systematic pain assessments using predominately observational scales with external and internal facilitators supporting the implementation. No measures were taken in the comparison group; pain management continued as before, but after the study corresponding training was provided. Resident data were collected baseline and at two follow-ups using validated scales and record reviews. Nurse group interviews were carried out twice. Primary outcome measures were wellbeing and proxy-measured pain. Secondary outcome measures were ADL-dependency and pain documentation. RESULTS: Using both non-parametric statistics on residential level and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models to take clustering effects into account, the results revealed non-significant interaction effects for the primary outcome measures, while for ADL-dependency using Katz-ADL there was a significant interaction effect. Comparison group (n = 66 residents) Katz-ADL values showed increased dependency over time, while the intervention group demonstrated no significant change over time (n = 98). In the intervention group, 13/44 residents showed decreased pain scores over the period, 14/44 had no pain score changes ≥ 30% in either direction measured with Doloplus-2. Furthermore, 17/44 residents showed increased pain scores ≥ 30% over time, indicating pain/risk for pain; 8 identified at the first assessment and 9 were new, i.e. developed pain over time. No significant changes in the use of drugs was found in any of the groups. Nursing pain related documentation was sparse. In general, nurses from the outset were positive regarding pain assessments. Persisting positive attitudes seemed strengthened by continued assessment experiences and perceptions of improved pain management. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a systematic work approach to pain issues in nursing homes indicates that an increased awareness, collaboration across and shared understanding among the team members of the pain assessment results can improve pain management and lead to decreased physical deterioration or the maintenance of physical and functional abilities among NH residents. However, pain (proxy-measured) and wellbeing level did not reveal any interaction effects between the groups over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in ISRCTN71142240 in September 2012, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5330015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53300152017-03-03 Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach Mamhidir, Anna-Greta Sjölund, Britt-Marie Fläckman, Birgitta Wimo, Anders Sköldunger, Anders Engström, Maria BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic pain affects nursing home residents’ daily life. Pain assessment is central to adequate pain management. The overall aim was to investigate effects of a pain management intervention on nursing homes residents and to describe staffs’ experiences of the intervention. METHODS: A cluster-randomized trial and a mixed-methods approach. Randomized nursing home assignment to intervention or comparison group. The intervention group after theoretical and practical training sessions, performed systematic pain assessments using predominately observational scales with external and internal facilitators supporting the implementation. No measures were taken in the comparison group; pain management continued as before, but after the study corresponding training was provided. Resident data were collected baseline and at two follow-ups using validated scales and record reviews. Nurse group interviews were carried out twice. Primary outcome measures were wellbeing and proxy-measured pain. Secondary outcome measures were ADL-dependency and pain documentation. RESULTS: Using both non-parametric statistics on residential level and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models to take clustering effects into account, the results revealed non-significant interaction effects for the primary outcome measures, while for ADL-dependency using Katz-ADL there was a significant interaction effect. Comparison group (n = 66 residents) Katz-ADL values showed increased dependency over time, while the intervention group demonstrated no significant change over time (n = 98). In the intervention group, 13/44 residents showed decreased pain scores over the period, 14/44 had no pain score changes ≥ 30% in either direction measured with Doloplus-2. Furthermore, 17/44 residents showed increased pain scores ≥ 30% over time, indicating pain/risk for pain; 8 identified at the first assessment and 9 were new, i.e. developed pain over time. No significant changes in the use of drugs was found in any of the groups. Nursing pain related documentation was sparse. In general, nurses from the outset were positive regarding pain assessments. Persisting positive attitudes seemed strengthened by continued assessment experiences and perceptions of improved pain management. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a systematic work approach to pain issues in nursing homes indicates that an increased awareness, collaboration across and shared understanding among the team members of the pain assessment results can improve pain management and lead to decreased physical deterioration or the maintenance of physical and functional abilities among NH residents. However, pain (proxy-measured) and wellbeing level did not reveal any interaction effects between the groups over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in ISRCTN71142240 in September 2012, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5330015/ /pubmed/28241785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0454-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mamhidir, Anna-Greta
Sjölund, Britt-Marie
Fläckman, Birgitta
Wimo, Anders
Sköldunger, Anders
Engström, Maria
Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach
title Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach
title_full Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach
title_fullStr Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach
title_full_unstemmed Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach
title_short Systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach
title_sort systematic pain assessment in nursing homes: a cluster-randomized trial using mixed-methods approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28241785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0454-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mamhidirannagreta systematicpainassessmentinnursinghomesaclusterrandomizedtrialusingmixedmethodsapproach
AT sjolundbrittmarie systematicpainassessmentinnursinghomesaclusterrandomizedtrialusingmixedmethodsapproach
AT flackmanbirgitta systematicpainassessmentinnursinghomesaclusterrandomizedtrialusingmixedmethodsapproach
AT wimoanders systematicpainassessmentinnursinghomesaclusterrandomizedtrialusingmixedmethodsapproach
AT skoldungeranders systematicpainassessmentinnursinghomesaclusterrandomizedtrialusingmixedmethodsapproach
AT engstrommaria systematicpainassessmentinnursinghomesaclusterrandomizedtrialusingmixedmethodsapproach