Cargando…

The search for the best infantry boot

BACKGROUND: The combat role of the twenty-first century infantry soldier has changed and accordingly their boots should evolve to meet these new needs and maximize soldier performance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate injuries and durability of the hot weather infantry boots (HWIB) in elite infantry training...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milgrom, Charles, Sorkin, Alex, Gam, Arnon, Singer, Jonathan, Nir, Itamar, Kogan, Boris, Finestone, Aharon S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-016-0024-5
_version_ 1782511178574987264
author Milgrom, Charles
Sorkin, Alex
Gam, Arnon
Singer, Jonathan
Nir, Itamar
Kogan, Boris
Finestone, Aharon S.
author_facet Milgrom, Charles
Sorkin, Alex
Gam, Arnon
Singer, Jonathan
Nir, Itamar
Kogan, Boris
Finestone, Aharon S.
author_sort Milgrom, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combat role of the twenty-first century infantry soldier has changed and accordingly their boots should evolve to meet these new needs and maximize soldier performance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate injuries and durability of the hot weather infantry boots (HWIB) in elite infantry training and assess the initial performance of newly designed Israeli infantry boots (NDIB). METHODS: In Phase 1, the durability of the HWIB during elite infantry training was evaluated at weeks 10, 19 and 64 in a cohort of 67 recruits. At each exam recruits removed their boots which were assessed for wear and integrity and photographed. The number of times recruits changed their boots was recorded. In Phase 2, foot injuries were assessed in a cohort of 73 elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB. In Phase 3, 65 infantry recruits were issued the NDIB. Recruits feet were measured for width and shoe size using the Brannock device and then followed for problems associated with their boots. Foot lesions were document by photographs. RESULTS: Phase 1: The mean longevity of HWIB in training was 5.2 ± 0.2 (SE) months, (95 % CI 4.83–5.61). Phase 2: 38 % of the elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB had at least one complaint and 31 (42 %) were found to have boot related injuries in a total of 56 injured areas. Phase 3: The mean predicted boot size (42.8 ± 1.7) based on Brannock measurements, was less than the size of the NDIB actually worn, 43.1 ± 1.6. Only 34.8 % of the feet were width D (the standard shoe width). At 9 day follow up, 55 of the 65 recruits who wore NDIB reported at least one problem with them (85 %, p < 0.0001, compared to HWIB). By 3 weeks, all but five recruits had returned to wearing the HWIB. Of the recruits wearing NDIB, 47 (72 %) were found to have had at least one boot related injury with a total number of 180 injured foot areas (p = 0.0004, compared to HWIB). CONCLUSIONS: The HWIB was well tolerated by the elite infantry recruits and associated with significantly less foot injuries than the NDIB. The longevity of the HWIB in demanding elite infantry training was five months. Trial registration: NCT02810002 retrospectively registered June 22, 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5330033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53300332017-03-06 The search for the best infantry boot Milgrom, Charles Sorkin, Alex Gam, Arnon Singer, Jonathan Nir, Itamar Kogan, Boris Finestone, Aharon S. Disaster Mil Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The combat role of the twenty-first century infantry soldier has changed and accordingly their boots should evolve to meet these new needs and maximize soldier performance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate injuries and durability of the hot weather infantry boots (HWIB) in elite infantry training and assess the initial performance of newly designed Israeli infantry boots (NDIB). METHODS: In Phase 1, the durability of the HWIB during elite infantry training was evaluated at weeks 10, 19 and 64 in a cohort of 67 recruits. At each exam recruits removed their boots which were assessed for wear and integrity and photographed. The number of times recruits changed their boots was recorded. In Phase 2, foot injuries were assessed in a cohort of 73 elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB. In Phase 3, 65 infantry recruits were issued the NDIB. Recruits feet were measured for width and shoe size using the Brannock device and then followed for problems associated with their boots. Foot lesions were document by photographs. RESULTS: Phase 1: The mean longevity of HWIB in training was 5.2 ± 0.2 (SE) months, (95 % CI 4.83–5.61). Phase 2: 38 % of the elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB had at least one complaint and 31 (42 %) were found to have boot related injuries in a total of 56 injured areas. Phase 3: The mean predicted boot size (42.8 ± 1.7) based on Brannock measurements, was less than the size of the NDIB actually worn, 43.1 ± 1.6. Only 34.8 % of the feet were width D (the standard shoe width). At 9 day follow up, 55 of the 65 recruits who wore NDIB reported at least one problem with them (85 %, p < 0.0001, compared to HWIB). By 3 weeks, all but five recruits had returned to wearing the HWIB. Of the recruits wearing NDIB, 47 (72 %) were found to have had at least one boot related injury with a total number of 180 injured foot areas (p = 0.0004, compared to HWIB). CONCLUSIONS: The HWIB was well tolerated by the elite infantry recruits and associated with significantly less foot injuries than the NDIB. The longevity of the HWIB in demanding elite infantry training was five months. Trial registration: NCT02810002 retrospectively registered June 22, 2016 BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5330033/ /pubmed/28265448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-016-0024-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Milgrom, Charles
Sorkin, Alex
Gam, Arnon
Singer, Jonathan
Nir, Itamar
Kogan, Boris
Finestone, Aharon S.
The search for the best infantry boot
title The search for the best infantry boot
title_full The search for the best infantry boot
title_fullStr The search for the best infantry boot
title_full_unstemmed The search for the best infantry boot
title_short The search for the best infantry boot
title_sort search for the best infantry boot
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40696-016-0024-5
work_keys_str_mv AT milgromcharles thesearchforthebestinfantryboot
AT sorkinalex thesearchforthebestinfantryboot
AT gamarnon thesearchforthebestinfantryboot
AT singerjonathan thesearchforthebestinfantryboot
AT niritamar thesearchforthebestinfantryboot
AT koganboris thesearchforthebestinfantryboot
AT finestoneaharons thesearchforthebestinfantryboot
AT milgromcharles searchforthebestinfantryboot
AT sorkinalex searchforthebestinfantryboot
AT gamarnon searchforthebestinfantryboot
AT singerjonathan searchforthebestinfantryboot
AT niritamar searchforthebestinfantryboot
AT koganboris searchforthebestinfantryboot
AT finestoneaharons searchforthebestinfantryboot