Cargando…
Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Premedication is an integral component of paediatric anaesthesia which, when optimal, allows comfortable separation of the child from the parent for induction and conduct of anaesthesia. Midazolam has been accepted as a safe and effective oral premedicant. Dexmedetomidine is a s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.199850 |
_version_ | 1782511186378489856 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Lakshmi Kumar, Ajay Panikkaveetil, Ramkumar Vasu, Bindu K Rajan, Sunil Nair, Suresh G |
author_facet | Kumar, Lakshmi Kumar, Ajay Panikkaveetil, Ramkumar Vasu, Bindu K Rajan, Sunil Nair, Suresh G |
author_sort | Kumar, Lakshmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Premedication is an integral component of paediatric anaesthesia which, when optimal, allows comfortable separation of the child from the parent for induction and conduct of anaesthesia. Midazolam has been accepted as a safe and effective oral premedicant. Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 agonist with sedative and analgesic effects, which is effective through the transmucosal route. We compared the efficacy and safety of standard premedication with oral midazolam versus intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication in children undergoing elective lower abdominal surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective randomised double-blinded trial comparing the effects of premedication with 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam versus 1 μg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine in children between 2 and 12 years undergoing abdominal surgery. Sedation scores at separation and induction were the primary outcome measures. Behaviour scores and haemodynamic changes were secondary outcomes. Student's t-test and Chi-square were used for analysis of the variables. RESULTS: Sedation scores were superior in Group B (dexmedetomidine) than Group A (midazolam) at separation and induction (P < 0.001). The behaviour scores at separation, induction and wake up scores at extubation were similar between the two groups. The heart rate and blood pressure showed significant differences at 15, 30 and 45 min in Group B but did not require pharmacological intervention for correction. CONCLUSION: Intranasal dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 μg/kg produced superior sedation scores at separation and induction but normal behavioural scores in comparison to oral midazolam in paediatric patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5330068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53300682017-03-01 Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication Kumar, Lakshmi Kumar, Ajay Panikkaveetil, Ramkumar Vasu, Bindu K Rajan, Sunil Nair, Suresh G Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Premedication is an integral component of paediatric anaesthesia which, when optimal, allows comfortable separation of the child from the parent for induction and conduct of anaesthesia. Midazolam has been accepted as a safe and effective oral premedicant. Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 agonist with sedative and analgesic effects, which is effective through the transmucosal route. We compared the efficacy and safety of standard premedication with oral midazolam versus intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication in children undergoing elective lower abdominal surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective randomised double-blinded trial comparing the effects of premedication with 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam versus 1 μg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine in children between 2 and 12 years undergoing abdominal surgery. Sedation scores at separation and induction were the primary outcome measures. Behaviour scores and haemodynamic changes were secondary outcomes. Student's t-test and Chi-square were used for analysis of the variables. RESULTS: Sedation scores were superior in Group B (dexmedetomidine) than Group A (midazolam) at separation and induction (P < 0.001). The behaviour scores at separation, induction and wake up scores at extubation were similar between the two groups. The heart rate and blood pressure showed significant differences at 15, 30 and 45 min in Group B but did not require pharmacological intervention for correction. CONCLUSION: Intranasal dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 μg/kg produced superior sedation scores at separation and induction but normal behavioural scores in comparison to oral midazolam in paediatric patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5330068/ /pubmed/28250480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.199850 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Lakshmi Kumar, Ajay Panikkaveetil, Ramkumar Vasu, Bindu K Rajan, Sunil Nair, Suresh G Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication |
title | Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication |
title_full | Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication |
title_short | Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication |
title_sort | efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.199850 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarlakshmi efficacyofintranasaldexmedetomidineversusoralmidazolamforpaediatricpremedication AT kumarajay efficacyofintranasaldexmedetomidineversusoralmidazolamforpaediatricpremedication AT panikkaveetilramkumar efficacyofintranasaldexmedetomidineversusoralmidazolamforpaediatricpremedication AT vasubinduk efficacyofintranasaldexmedetomidineversusoralmidazolamforpaediatricpremedication AT rajansunil efficacyofintranasaldexmedetomidineversusoralmidazolamforpaediatricpremedication AT nairsureshg efficacyofintranasaldexmedetomidineversusoralmidazolamforpaediatricpremedication |